AP Statistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

AP Statistics

Description:

Experiments where there are no lurking or confounding variables can have a very ... The absence of lurking and confounding variables means that the observed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: technol215
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AP Statistics


1
AP Statistics
  • 5.2 Designing Experiments

2
Essential Questions
  • What are the principles of experimental design?
  • How can the accuracy of an experimental design
    be improved?
  • What is blocking as an experimental methodology?
  • What cautions accompany the use of an
    experimental methodology?

3
Designing Experiments
  • An experiment is a study with a treatment imposed
    on all or a portion of the sample.

4
Definitions
  • Experimental Units the individuals on which the
    experiment is conducted. If the units are human
    beings, they are often referred to as subjects.
  • Treatment a specific experimental condition
    applied to the units
  • Factors the explanatory variable(s) in the
    experiment. Many studies include several
    explanatory variables or factors.
  • Level the specific value or quantity of a factor

5
Principles of Experimental Design
  • Control by random assignment, the effects of
    lurking variables are accounted for
  • Randomization the use of chance to select units
    for the sample and assign them to treatment
    groups
  • Replication experiment is repeated on many
    subjects or on several occasions to reduce chance
    variation

6
Comparative Experiments
Control
  • Experiments where there are no lurking or
    confounding variables can have a very simple
    design where a treatment is provided to all
    experimental units and the response variable is
    then measured. The absence of lurking and
    confounding variables means that the observed
    response must have resulted directly from the
    treatment. No comparison is necessary.
  • Example Testing the amount of weight a beam will
    support

Units
Treatment
Observe Response
7
Comparative Experiments
Control
  • In the presence of lurking variables, however,
    this simple design fails to provide internal
    validity.
  • Example Treating ulcers (p. 270)

8
Comparative Experiments
Randomization
  • Comparison of the effects of several treatments
    is valid only when the treatments are applied to
    similar groups of experimental units.
  • Chance or random assignment is the least bias and
    most accurate method of assuring that each
    treatment group contains similar lurking
    variables.
  • The only difference between groups and thus the
    only reason that the observed response variable
    should vary is the treatment.

9
Comparative Experiments
Randomization
  • Randomized Comparative Design

Group 1
Treatment 1
Compare Response Variable
Random Assignment
Group 2
Treatment 2
Group 3
Treatment 3
If all experimental units are randomly allocated
among all treatment groups, the design is
completely randomized.
10
Comparative Experiments
Replication
  • By assigning each treatment to multiple
    experimental units, the effects of chance will
    average out.
  • The fewer the number of experimental units in
    each group, the more likely that some lurking
    variables will be present in one and not the
    other.
  • Use enough experimental units to reduce chance
    variation.

11
Principles of Experimental Design
  • Control
  • Randomization
  • Replication

12
What are the principals of experimental
design(3)? Explain how each can be accomplished?
  • Control design a comparative experiment and
    compare the response variable. (a control group
    could be used treatment is placebo)
  • Randomization randomly assign units to the
    comparative groups and randomly assign units to
    each treatment
  • Replication use many subjects/units to reduce
    the chance variation in the results

13
Describe the units, factors, treatments and
response variable.
  • The ability to grow in shade may help pines found
    in the dry forests of Arizona to resist drought.,
    How well do these pines grow in shade?
    Investigators planted pine seedlings in a
    greenhouse in either full light or light reduced
    to 5 of normal by shade cloth. At the end of
    the study, they dried the young trees and weighed
    them.

14
  • A large study used records from Canadas national
    health care system to compare the effectiveness
    of two ways to treat prostate disease. The two
    treatments are traditional surgery and a new
    method that does not require surgery. The
    records described many patients whose doctors had
    chosen each method. The study found that
    patients treated by the new method were
    significantly more likely to die within 8 years.
  • What lurking variables might be present?
  • Is this an observation study or an experiment?
  • Describe the variables explanatory and
    response.
  • If there are 300 prostate patients who are
    willing to serve as subjects, show, using a
    diagram, to demonstrate a completely randomized
    experiment. Include the amount of subjects in
    each group.

15
Statistical Significance
  • A result is statistically significant if it is so
    large that it is unlikely to have occurred by
    chance.

16
Types of Experimental Design
  • Blind the experimental units are not aware of
    which treatment group they are in (control
    placebo effect)
  • Double-blind neither the subjects nor the people
    who have contact with them know which treatment
    group they are in (those who measure the response
    variable are unaware)

17
Types of Experimental Design
  • Block
  • A block is a group of experimental units that are
    known prior to the experiment to be similar in
    some way that is expected to effect the response
    to the treatments (i.e. they share a potential
    lurking variable)
  • In a block design, the random assignment of
    treatments to units is done within each block

18
Block Design
Group 1
Treatment 1
Compare Response Variable
Random Assignment
Block 1
Group 2
Treatment 2
Group 3
Treatment 3
Subjects
Group 1
Treatment 1
Compare Response Variable
Random Assignment
Group 2
Treatment 2
Block 2
Group 3
Treatment 3
19
Diagram a randomized block design.
  • The progress of a type of cancer differs in women
    and men. A clinical experiment to compare three
    therapies for this cancer therefore treats gender
    as a blocking variable. Two separate
    randomizations are done, one assigning the female
    subjects to the treatments band the other
    assigning the male subjects.

20
Types of Experimental Design
  • Matched Pairs
  • A matched pairs design is a type of block design
    where each block contains just two units
  • Twin studies

21
Caution
  • The most serious potential weakness of an
    experiment is lack of realism. Often, the units,
    treatments, or setting of an experiment does not
    realistically duplicate or reflect the conditions
    under investigation.

22
Essential Questions
  • What are the principles of experimental design?
  • How can the accuracy of an experimental design
    be improved?
  • What is blocking as an experimental methodology?
  • What cautions accompany the use of an
    experimental methodology?

23
Assignment
  • Identifying Components
  • P. 268 5.26, - 5.28

Principles of Design P. 273 5.30 - 5.32
Experimental Design P. 277 5.35 5.37 P. 279
5.38 - 5.39 P. 282 5.40 5.41
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com