IFRS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

IFRS

Description:

More than 15,000 companies listed overseas use IFRS ... Its ever-lengthening endorsement process detracts from worldwide comparability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: cyndiej
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IFRS


1
IFRS!
2
What is IFRS
  • International Financial Reporting Standards

3
Who Establishes IFRS?
  • International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)

4
Why Do We Care?
  • Use of IFRS is widespread
  • More than 15,000 companies listed overseas use
    IFRS
  • In 2011, India and Canada, among others, will
    convert their financial reporting systems to IFRS
  • This will add at least 12,000 additional
    companies to the list of companies reporting
    under IFRS

5
  • In the past, companies who wished to list
    securities in the US had to reconcile their
    financial statements to show the nature and cause
    of differences in earnings based on their
    reporting standards and US GAAP on a Form 20-F
  • As of 2007, the SEC removed this restriction for
    companies using IFRS and now allows foreign
    registrations to use IFRS without reconciliation

6
  • The SEC is in the process of publishing a
    proposed roadmap (more on this later) that is
    moving toward allowing or requiring U.S.
    companies to use IFRS.
  • This could mean that U.S. GAAP is no longer
    usedand we are talking about a timeframe from
    2009 2016..

7
  • The FASB, SEC, AICPA, and the Big-4 Accounting
    firms (KPMG, PWC, Deloitte Touche, and EY) all
    favor the adoption of a set of high quality
    international reporting standards, and the
    consensus is growing that IFRS will be that
    standard.
  • The AICPA supports one set of high-quality
    global accounting standards for public
    companies, said Barry Melancon, AICPA president
    and CEO.  We believe the capital markets
    ultimately will insist on IFRS for public
    companies. Todays action by the SEC continues a
    robust and thoughtful debate that is critical as
    the transition occurs.

8
Why Global Accounting Standards?
  • Enhanced worldwide comparability for investors
  • Enhanced quality of reporting
  • Some national GAAPs are week
  • Possibly a lower cost of capital
  • More company-friendly US securities market for
    foreign listings

9
  • Reduced reporting costs
  • No need to develop and maintain national
    standards
  • For audit firms and companies
  • Easier movement of auditors and accountants
    across borders

10
IASB
  • The International Accounting Standards Committee
    was founded in 1973. At that time, it was
    composed of volunteers who met three times a
    year. They issued statements called
    International Accounting Standards (IASs) they
    issued 41 such standards.

11
  • As the demand grew for international reporting
    standards, IOSCO (The International Organization
    of Securities Commissions, of which the U.S. SEC
    is a member) issued a mandate that the IASC
    develop a core set of standards, and determined
    that if they were successful, the SECs of member
    countries would consider pursing international
    standards for their jurisdictions.

12
  • To meet this mandate, it was necessary to
    restructure the IASC
  • In 2001, the first restructuring occurred
  • Full time IASB based in London
  • 14 members
  • Issue IFRS (old IASs remain in force unless
    superseded or revised)

13
USE OF IFRS WORLDWIDE
  • For domestic LISTEC companies
  • IFRS required for all 85
  • IFRS required for some 4
  • IFRS permitted 24
  • IFRS are used by UNLISTED companies in over 80
    jurisdictions

14
Europe
  • EU, EAA, and Switzerland
  • IFRS is used by all listed entitites (about
    8,000) in consolidated statements.
  • In the EU, IFRS must be endorsed by the Union
  • One modification with respect to reporting on
    derivatives (IAS 39) so the audit report reads
    IFRSs a adopted by the EU
  • The modification affects just a few companies
    (less than 100)

15
  • The endorsement mechanism in the EU results in
    time lags.
  • (NOTE The SEC only accepts IFRS as published in
    English by the IASB for U.S. filings without
    reconciliation)

16
Asia-Pacific
  • Nearly word-for word convergence Australia, New
    Zealand, Hong Kong
  • Modifications, time lags, some not adopted
    Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, China
  • Own standards Japan (convergence program in
    place), Taiwain
  • 2011 adoption of IFRS planned India, Korea

17
North American
  • Canada, planned conversion to IFRS in 2011
  • USA
  • Permitted for foreign SEC registrants since
    March 2009
  • Proposed roadmap for US adoption

18
Latin America/Caribbean
  • IFRS required in Brazil by 2010 for all listed
    companies, banks
  • IFRS phased in from 2009-2011 in Chili and over a
    dozen smaller jurisdictions

19
Middle East and Africa
  • Many countries require IFRS, although there are
    often country-specific idiosyncracies

20
Financial Reporting Environments
  • US strong enforcement by SEC
  • Long traditionof strict, detailed accounting
    standards
  • Publication of audited financial statements by
    publicly traded companies

21
Many other countries
  • Strong company laws with moderate to weak
    enforcement by regulators
  • Less litigation
  • Diverse auditing cultures
  • Private as well as public companies must often
    publish financial statements, often audited

22
CANADA, UK, US
  • Public sector has long accepted private sector
    accounting standards

23
EU
  • Public sector is suspicious of private-sector
    accounting standards, questioning if they are in
    the public interest
  • Its ever-lengthening endorsement process detracts
    from worldwide comparability

24
  • IFRS as adopted by the EU may foreshadow further
    deviations from IFRS

25
  • Most countries converge national GAAP with IFRS.
  • Some adopt IFRS as published by the IASB
  • IFRS is becoming more rules-based (1,200 pages in
    2000 2,700 pages in 2008)

26
IFRS vs US GAAP
  • IFRS Principles-based standards with limited
    application guidance
  • US Rules-based standards with specific
    application guidance

27
Some Differences
  • Measuring Goodwill
  • Disclosure of segment liabilities
  • Basis for consolidation
  • LIFO
  • Deferred tax assets
  • Revaluation of PPE and quoted intangibles
    through equity
  • Development costs

28
  • Gains on sale and leaseback
  • Investments in real estate
  • Agricultural assets
  • Actuarial gains and losses
  • Vested past service cost
  • Joint ventures
  • Measuring impairment
  • Reversals of write-downs

29
SEC to Propose Roadmap for Potential Mandatory
IFRS Filings
  • On August 27, 2008, the SEC decided to issue a
    proposed IFRS Roadmap.
  • The SEC proposed specific rule changes that would
    permit the use of IRFS for certain U.S. issuers.
  • The Roadmap proposal will be published in the
    Federal Register within 60 days.

30
  • The proposal acknowledges that IFRSs have the
    potential to become the global set of accounting
    standards
  • A timetable for adoption in the U.S. is proposed.
  • Assuming certain milestones are achieved, the SEC
    is considering a mandatory transition to IFRSs
    starting in 2014.

31
  • The proposed roadmap would commit the SEC staff
    to monitor the progress toward achieving
    milestones.
  • IF, in 2011, the SEC deems there has been
    adequate progress toward achieving the
    milestones, they would consider adopting final
    rules requiring U.S. public companies to use
    IFRS.

32
  • The proposed roadmap includes a potential phased
    transition over three years beginning with large
    accelerated filers in 2014, followed by
    accelerated filers in 2015, and concluding with
    non-accelerated filers in 2016.

33
Milestones
  • IFRS continued improvement. IFRS would be
    improved largely through continued efforts b the
    IASB and the FASB to converge IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
  • Funding and accountability of the International
    Accounting Standards Committee Foundation.
    Accountability would be strengthened by
    establishing a monitoring group and its funding
    process would be stabilized by basing int on
    shared obligations undertaken by jurisdictions
    using IFRS.

34
  • Improvement in the ability to use interactive
    date (e.g., XBRL) for IFRS reporting. That is,
    the technical capability to communicate financial
    information in the XBRL computer language based
    on the coding terms specified in a taxonomy
    would have to be available.
  • Education and training in IFRS in the United
    States.

35
  • Limited early use by eligible entities. This
    milestone would give certain U.S. issuers the
    option of using IFRS for fiscal years ending on
    or after December 15, 2009.
  • A majority of peer-group companies report using
    IFRS as issued by the IASB
  • The U.S. company is one of the top 20 peer group
    companies
  • (potentially more than 110 companies representing
    approximately 14 of total U.S. market
    capitalization.)

36
  • On the basis of the progress toward meeting
    milestones 1-4, and the experience gained from
    milestone 5, the SEC will determine in 2011
    whether to require mandatory adoptoin of IFRS for
    all U.S. issuers. If so, the SEC will determine
    the date and approach for a mandatory transition
    to IFRS.

37
Resources
  • http//www.iasplus.com/index.htm
  • http//www.iasplus.com/resource/0808aaaifrsresourc
    es.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com