Title: Image Dynamics in Nanotechnology
1Image Dynamics in Nanotechnologys Risk
DebateMarloes van Amerom (PhD) Martin
Ruivenkamp (M.A.)
2Image Dynamics in Nanotechnologys Risk Debate
- A growing number of actors are discussing the
risks and drawbacks of Nanotechnology.
- Images used by actors involved can be an
important means of communicating risks, and of
generating support for the notion that given
technology is dangerous and/or should be
regulated.
- During the portrayal of GM food Frankenstein
Food became a popular image.
3Image Dynamics in Nanotechnologys Risk Debate
- Image is a broad concept and may refer to
representations, future notions, graphic
illustrations, pictures, movies, and so on.
- Attention is specifically focused on nanorisk
alerting parties such as an NGO, a (re)-insurance
company and prudent scientists
- In this paper images are understood as
- Metaphor a figure of speech, offering a view on
something by likening it to something else - Terse story an abbreviated and succinct
simplification of the story in which parts of the
plot, some of the characters, and segments of the
sequence of events are left to the hearers
imagination (Boje, et al., 2004)
4Images of Nano-Risks
- Metaphor Nanoparticles as the next Asbestos
Nanotubes
Asbestos
5Images of Nano-Risks
6Research Questions
- How do these images mix, shape and compete with
images of other stakeholders? - How do images affect agenda-setting processes in
the nanotech risk debate? - What are the possible implications of the
outcomes of these processes on the perceived
desirability of the usage of nanotechnology for
and in developing countries?
7Nanoparticles as the new Asbestos
- Since 2002 the notion that nanoparticles could
carry Health, Environmental and Safety risks has
increasingly entered and informed the nanotech
risk debate.
Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering used
the image nanoparticles as the next asbestos as
well
- In 2002 ETC Group quoted nano-material scientist
Wiesner Nanoparticles could be the next best
thing to sliced bread or the next asbestos. (ETC
Group, 2002 5) - ETC demanded strict regulations
- Re-insurance company Swiss Re argued that
nanoparticles could turn out to be a second
asbestos leading to major damage claims for
companies - On this basis Swiss Re called for application of
the Precautionary Principle
8Grey Goo
- Drexlers notion of Grey Goo (non-biological
molecular machines eat up the entire biosphere)
has firstly been identified as a possible
nanotech danger.
Grey Goo as terse story simplified and
abbreviated, Grey Goo is about havoc wreaking
machines. Other parts of the story are left to
the hearers/readers imagination, without
damaging the notion itself.
Further impetus to the Grey Goo was given by
Bill Joy in Why the future doesnt need us.
It is sustained by Crichtons novel Prey,
although Prey is about out-of-control swarms of
biological organisms.
9Preliminary Findings
- Images are increasingly important elements in
risk communication exercises by nanotech risk
alerters, still to little considered. - How images are framed and received should be
considered in more depth. - In emerging industrial countries the image of
nanoparticles as the new asbestos is counterposed
by the nano-divide.
10To be continued