AGIS Conference : Multidimensional Restorative Justice for Everyone Budapest, 89 December PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 12
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AGIS Conference : Multidimensional Restorative Justice for Everyone Budapest, 89 December


1
AGIS Conference Multidimensional Restorative
Justice for Everyone Budapest, 8-9 December
  • Prof.Dr. Doina Balahur
  • Al.I.Cuza University of Iasi, Romania
  • Restorative Justice Developments in Romania

2
General Trends The Reform of the Justice Systems
and the Proliferation of ADR Practices
  • There is a general trend, spread worldwide,
    aiming at the REFORM of the justice systems.
  • The motivations for the deep changes the Justice
    Systems are experiencing are very different.
  • Some pieces of research appreciate that the
    Reform is the result of the globally spread
    Neo-liberalism and its accompanying policies
    connected to the minimal state and subsidiarized
    patterns of governance ( local autonomy, cutting
    the public expenditure etc).

3
Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • No matter how the Reforms are interpreted
    /explained the empirical research identified
    several common directions.
  • Among them, the implementation of the practices
    of Alternative Dispute Resolution (VOM, RJ,
    Negotiation, Conciliation, Ombudsman etc) seems
    to be an important option the justice systems are
    taking now into consideration.
  • Braithwaite, identified more than 700 (2001),
    Bazemore more than 500 in USA (2005))
  • In Europe, under the influence of the EU
    Regulations and of the Council of Europe
    Recommendations ADR are implemented in all the
    European countries (COST A 21).

4
Romania and the Reform of the Justice System
  • Within the process of the Reform of the Justice
    System Romania had some priorities
  • Among them I)the observance of Human Rights
    standards in the legal /(especially) penal law
    and practices was of paramount importance both
    for becoming a member of the Council of Europe
    (since 1994) and than for the EU accession (2007)
    and II) The case overload of the judges

5
The Reform of the Juvenile Justice System
6
New Legal Measures and Strategies for the
Juvenile Justice System
  • Three new social-legal institutions contributed
    to the radical changes within Romanian Juvenile
    Justice System and to a better observance of the
    Human Rights of the children in conflict with
    criminal law
  • A) Probation (generally, alternative strategies
    ti custody/ 2000)
  • B) Setting up the Juvenile Courts (2003)
  • C) Implementing the experimental programmes of
    VOM (2003)

7
Impact on the Juvenile Justice System
  • The implementation of these three institutions
    resulted in the dropping down of the number of
    the juveniles locked (586 in custody in
    Educational Centers).

8
Case overload and the efficacy of the justice
system
  • In1990, 1.513 judges had 589.660 civil and penal
    files
  • The average case load for a judge/year was
    390/files
  • In 2003, 3.557 judges had 1.453.776 files, that
    is, an average of 409 files/judge/year.

9
Setting up the legal frame for Mediation
  • Since 2006 Romania has a special law (192/2006)
    which regulates the possibility of referring the
    civil, commercial, family, and penal conflicts to
    the Mediation bodies.
  • It is in force since the beginning of 2007

10
The state of art
  • Our evaluative research indicates that until now
    the Mediation has been used only for Civil and
    Commercial cases.
  • In less than one year (according to the data on
    the NCM) 89 civil/commercial cases have been
    solved by mediators.

11
There is no spring with a flower
  • The law on mediation has important weakness which
    makes it less, or not at all effective in the
    field of family and penal conflicts
  • Law on mediation states the obligation of the
    parties to pay for the mediation services/
    raising important restrictions for the parties
    which can not afford/ and limiting the access to
    justice.
  • It promised to better observe HR .but it
    infringes important legal guaranties and rights..
  • However so as our empirical research showed-
    there is an important openness of the judges and
    prosecutors towards the implementation of ADR.

12
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com