Title: AGIS Conference : Multidimensional Restorative Justice for Everyone Budapest, 89 December
1AGIS Conference Multidimensional Restorative
Justice for Everyone Budapest, 8-9 December
- Prof.Dr. Doina Balahur
- Al.I.Cuza University of Iasi, Romania
- Restorative Justice Developments in Romania
2General Trends The Reform of the Justice Systems
and the Proliferation of ADR Practices
- There is a general trend, spread worldwide,
aiming at the REFORM of the justice systems. - The motivations for the deep changes the Justice
Systems are experiencing are very different. - Some pieces of research appreciate that the
Reform is the result of the globally spread
Neo-liberalism and its accompanying policies
connected to the minimal state and subsidiarized
patterns of governance ( local autonomy, cutting
the public expenditure etc).
3Alternative Dispute Resolution
- No matter how the Reforms are interpreted
/explained the empirical research identified
several common directions. - Among them, the implementation of the practices
of Alternative Dispute Resolution (VOM, RJ,
Negotiation, Conciliation, Ombudsman etc) seems
to be an important option the justice systems are
taking now into consideration. - Braithwaite, identified more than 700 (2001),
Bazemore more than 500 in USA (2005)) - In Europe, under the influence of the EU
Regulations and of the Council of Europe
Recommendations ADR are implemented in all the
European countries (COST A 21).
4Romania and the Reform of the Justice System
- Within the process of the Reform of the Justice
System Romania had some priorities - Among them I)the observance of Human Rights
standards in the legal /(especially) penal law
and practices was of paramount importance both
for becoming a member of the Council of Europe
(since 1994) and than for the EU accession (2007)
and II) The case overload of the judges
5The Reform of the Juvenile Justice System
6New Legal Measures and Strategies for the
Juvenile Justice System
- Three new social-legal institutions contributed
to the radical changes within Romanian Juvenile
Justice System and to a better observance of the
Human Rights of the children in conflict with
criminal law - A) Probation (generally, alternative strategies
ti custody/ 2000) - B) Setting up the Juvenile Courts (2003)
- C) Implementing the experimental programmes of
VOM (2003)
7Impact on the Juvenile Justice System
- The implementation of these three institutions
resulted in the dropping down of the number of
the juveniles locked (586 in custody in
Educational Centers).
8Case overload and the efficacy of the justice
system
- In1990, 1.513 judges had 589.660 civil and penal
files - The average case load for a judge/year was
390/files - In 2003, 3.557 judges had 1.453.776 files, that
is, an average of 409 files/judge/year.
9Setting up the legal frame for Mediation
- Since 2006 Romania has a special law (192/2006)
which regulates the possibility of referring the
civil, commercial, family, and penal conflicts to
the Mediation bodies. - It is in force since the beginning of 2007
10The state of art
- Our evaluative research indicates that until now
the Mediation has been used only for Civil and
Commercial cases. - In less than one year (according to the data on
the NCM) 89 civil/commercial cases have been
solved by mediators.
11There is no spring with a flower
- The law on mediation has important weakness which
makes it less, or not at all effective in the
field of family and penal conflicts - Law on mediation states the obligation of the
parties to pay for the mediation services/
raising important restrictions for the parties
which can not afford/ and limiting the access to
justice. - It promised to better observe HR .but it
infringes important legal guaranties and rights.. - However so as our empirical research showed-
there is an important openness of the judges and
prosecutors towards the implementation of ADR.
12Thank you