Title: GEOG2400 SPRING 2003 THE GEOGRAPHY OF WORLD DEVELOPMENT
1GEOG2400 SPRING 2003 THE GEOGRAPHY OF WORLD
DEVELOPMENT
- CLASS 1
- World geography is our view of the world real?
- What exactly is development?
- How can we define it, measure it, and compare it?
Element 3 Sophomore GE Cluster Global Wealth,
Poverty and Inequality
2How we view the world
3How the world really is
4Challenging Our Perceptions
- We have become accustomed to viewing the Northern
Hemisphere and Europe and North America as being
geographically larger, more central and therefore
more prominent. - The tropics and southern land masses have been
marginalized in our perceptions even though the
majority of the worlds people reside there.
5Where do we live? How do we live?
- From space we can pick out the lights of towns
and cities across the world. - We can see where populations are most dense
and/or where energy consumption is greatest
thus this image is a composite of population and
economic development status.
6Variations are the norm
Both of these images are from Africa. In all
developing countries you find the
same disparities of wealth and poverty, frequently
even more extreme than we find here at home.
The gains from human development are unequally
distributed within and between nations.
Development assistance or ODA seeks to
redress some of these imbalances.
7Global Inequality
- The assets of the worlds richest 200 people are
more than the combined income of 41 of the
worlds population. - The assets of the 3 richest people in the world
are more than the combined income of all of the
least developed countries (600 million people). - The income gap between the top and bottom
countries increased from 3 to 1 in 1820, to 7 to
1 in 1870, to 11 to 1 by 1913, to 74 to 1 by 1999.
Source UNDP HDR 1999 2000.
8Dimensions of Inequity
- By the late 1990s, the 1/5 (20) of the worlds
population living in the highest-income countries
had - 86 of the worlds wealth (the bottom 1/5 had
just 1), - 82 of the world exports,
- 68 of the worlds foreign investment,
- 74 of the worlds telephone lines (the bottom
1/5 had just 1.5).
Source UNDP HDR 1999.
9Average Incomes by Region
Source UNDP HDR 2001.
10What is Development?
- A term that implies the achievement of some level
of economic, social and political development
which some countries have managed to attain, and
others have not. - A moving target, not defined by some universal,
unwavering standard. - Permits, sometimes with difficulty, the
characterization of some nations as developed
and others as under-developed, less-developed
or developing. - Characterization requires some agreed upon
threshold or thresholds.
11A Temporal Perspective
- Development the processes by which economic,
social and political changes have taken place (an
historical perspective). - The movement of a nations society from one type
of system (inferior?) to another (superior?). -
- Development the achievement of progress (a
forward looking perspective). - The political and social changes that can be
expected to take place or are necessary to create
the conditions by which more of the worlds
resources will be distributed more equitably and
to any given nation.
12Development as a Positive
- Development implies beneficial change for the
citizens of a nation. - Increased economic well-being,
- Enlightened and efficient political systems,
- Supportive and culturally enriched social
systems. - Creates an important gray area for development
analysts. - Involves many ideological, value judgments e.g.
what comprises an appropriate political system or
social system? - For example, Fidel Castro would say that Cuba is
more developed that the USA clearly George Bush
would not agree!
13The Development Continuum
- Nominal status (yes/no)
- e.g. status of selected international human
rights instruments (ratified/unratified), womens
right to vote, etc. - Ordinal status (rank)
- e.g. Human Development Index (1-174)
- Interval/Ratio status (a real number along some
kind of continuous scale) - e.g. Prisoners per 100,000 people 1994 (for
those reporting data Kuwait _at_ 2.0 to Russian
Federation _at_ 580.2 USA was 553.9)
Source UNDP, 1999.
14Economic Criterion
- The most universal notion of development uses
economic terms - from some notion of poverty to
some notion of wealth. - The mean or median per capita GDP worldwide is
often used as a measure to separate out the
developed from the developing nations. - Currently, a rule of thumb of 6,000 GDP/cap is
being used (1999 mean GDP/cap PPP was 6,980).
15Faulty Economics?
- Environmental economists question whether GDP/cap
really captures the notion of true economic
development. - Includes good and bad GDP.
- Ignores sustainability questions and diminishing
natural capital. - Doesnt capture income/wealth inequalities in a
given nation. - Hides interactions between economic
growth/decline and population growth/decline.
16The Poverty Trap
- Averages hide inequalities.
- With a GDP/cap PPP of 31,872, USA had 17 of
its households living below the income poverty
line of 50 of median income in 1999. - Many poorer nations have lower poverty s e.g.
Mexico 10, Thailand 13. - Many developing nations have enormous s below
their official poverty line e.g. Honduras 50,
Sierra Leone 68 . - UNDP uses 1 per day 1993 PPP as one of its
measures e.g. Honduras 40.5 , Sierra Leone 57.
Sources UNDP, 2001.
17Indicators of development?
- Indicators of development are the variables we
can quantify that allow us to make meaningful
comparisons between nations or groups with
respect to their relative standings. - Whether an indicator measures positive or
negative levels of development determines what
its value means i.e. what it says if the numbers
are high or low. - Does it try and measure beneficial or prejudicial
dimensions of development? - Does it try and capture how far an entity still
has to go or how far it has progressed? - i.e. (1.0 - x) or (0.0 x)
18Glass half empty?
- Deciding on appropriate indicators sparks fierce
debate. - Developing nations prefer indicators that give
them the chance to show how well they are doing,
not how poorly. - Development workers want indicators that focus on
improvement and not on decline (i.e. that set
positive goals and articulate beneficial
standings). - Single indicators are limited in their ability to
capture the multiple dimensions of quality of
life. - Suites (indices) of indicators must be
appropriately grouped to facilitate calculations
and interpretations of what an index means.
19Some indicators
20Popular Indices of Development
- GDP/GNP per cap total wealth of a nation
divided by its population (can be in adjusted
PPP or non-adjusted form). - Physical Quality of Life Index used life
expectancy at birth, infant mortality and
literacy (popular in the 1970s). - Index of Social Progress (Estes, 1988) uses 46
separate variables to try and include such issues
as political participation and stability. - Human Development Index (UNDP, 1991) very
similar to the PQLI, but instead combines income,
life expectancy, educational opportunity and
literacy. - The HDI is used by the UN for their annual report
on the state of the world (your text). - The mirror image of the HDI is the Human Poverty
Index, e.g. HPI-1 measures probability of not
surviving to age 40, adult illiteracy rate, and
average of population not using improved water
sources and children under five that are
underweight.
21Development Indices
- Difficult to develop meaningful combinations.
- Nations may be consistently high scoring,
consistently low scoring, or more commonly, may
vary rank enormously depending on the mix of
indicators. - Depends on how strongly the suite of indicators
favors economic, social or cultural factors
(countries like Cuba will zoom up and down!). - What is the purpose or value of development
indices? - Allows us to categorize nations based on a
broader notion of development achievement. - Allows us to capture and track real progress over
time. - Permits us to develop more objective criteria for
the study of regions and nations and for
practical matters such as the allocation of
international aid, debt relief, and so forth.
22Key Steps to Development
- Those nations who have achieved high economic
status today have generally successfully passed
through - Demographic transition
- Transitioning from high birth/high death (45/40)
to low-birth/low death rate (11/10). - Demographic transformation
- Transitioning from a predominantly agrarian/rural
to an industrial/urban society. - Economic transition
- Transitioning from a predominantly raw
materials-based economy to a more diversified
manufacturing and services economy.
23The Demographic Transition
(source Wright Nebel, 2002)
24Regional Demographic Progress
(source Wright Nebel, 2002)
25Taking Off Economically
- Has needed strong central government.
- Has needed capitalists/risk takers to invest in
manufacturing and trade. - Has needed reinvestment of a large portion of
current income into capital development. - Has needed valued natural resources (or cheap
access to them) to provide raw materials to
exploit (and export). - Has needed key industries to develop able to add
value to raw materials and trigger raw material
processing (upstream) and manufacturing and
service industries (downstream) growth. - Has needed application of modern technology to
all sectors of society.
26Resources for Development
- We can think in terms of raw material resources,
human resources and knowledge/technology
resources. - Similar material resources may be found in many
different locations/nations (http//www.geohive.co
m/global/ec_natres.php). - However the human potential to exploit them, and
the knowledge and technology used in that
exploitation can and will differ greatly. - Resources are not static - their character and
uses have changed through time as a result of
human actions. - Many resources are mobile - they can be imported
(by force or payment) - note that this includes
human resources. - Many countries are dependent on one or two
resources and are very vulnerable to competition
and substitution.
27Contemporary Obstacles
- Social systems prolonging high birth rates (30),
low death rates (10) - prevents closing of
demographic gap, leads to rapid population
growth, and a relatively small of economically
active persons. - Structural dominance in global markets - the
richer countries use their political and economic
power to set the rules governing international
trade, boosting their interests, often at the
expense of the poorer nations. - Heavy debt burdens - governments must direct
capital to interest payments, not
growth-producing investments.
28Bursting populations outstrip economic growth
(source Wright Nebel, 2002)