Deposition av partiklar i andningsvgarna - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Deposition av partiklar i andningsvgarna

Description:

1Department of Physics, Lund University, PO Box 118, SE-221 00, ... No increase in inflamatory marker cells (bronchoalveolar lavage) Increase in GSH, Glutathione ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: thomasr69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deposition av partiklar i andningsvgarna


1
Deposition av partiklar i andningsvägarna
  • Jakob Löndahl1, Joakim Pagels2, Erik Swietlicki1,
    Andreas Massling1
  • Elvira Vaclavik3, Christoffer Boman4, Steffen
    Loft3, Mats Bohgard2
  • Anders Blomberg5 and Thomas Sandström5
  • 1Department of Physics, Lund University, PO Box
    118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
  • 2Division of Aerosol Technology (EAT), Lund
    University, PO Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
  • 3Department of Environmental and Occupational
    Health, Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen,
    Denmark
  • 4Department of Physics, Lund Institute of
    Technology, PO Box 118, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden
  • 5Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy,
    University Hospital, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden

2
John Tyndall(1820-1893)
3
Linking Emissions to Health Effects
Lung Deposition
Emission
Exposure
Dose
Health effect
Concentration





4
  • Factors determining respiratory tract deposition
  • exposure concentration
  • exposure duration
  • inhaled volume
  • deposition probability
  • paticle properties - size, hygroscopicity
  • respiratory tract anatomy
  • ventilatory parameters

5
(No Transcript)
6
Experiemental design
  • 29 healthy adults
  • 20 men, 9 women
  • Age 20-38
  • Healthy (lung function tested)
  • Four experiments, each 21 minutes
  • Oil (DEHS) relax/exercise
  • NaCl relax/exercise

7
Mean values
Deposited dose Deposition fraction x
Inhaled volume
8
Model comparison (ICRP)
9
Gender differences
10
Intersubject variability (oil, rest)
11
Intersubject variability (oil, exercise)
12
Intersubject variability (correlation)
13
  • Conclusion
  • Difference in Deposited Dose?

14
  • Conclusion Deposited Dose?
  • Rest/Exercise
  • inhaled volume 4 times larger during exercise
  • ?4 times higher dose
  • Hydrophobic/Hygroscopic
  • for 0.1 µm particles, factor 4 difference
  • ?4 x 4 16 times higher dose
  • Intersubject variability
  • factor 3 difference between subjects
  • ?4 x 4 x 3 48 times higher dose

15
  • Biomass and Traffic

DF 0.2
DF gt 0.5
16
  • Wood smoke
  • Relatively modest and ambiguous effects
    determined so far!
  • No effects on lung function (FEV1, FVC)
  • No increase in exhaled NO
  • No increase in inflamatory marker
    cells (bronchoalveolar lavage)
  • Increase in GSH, Glutathione ? indicates
    oxidative stress
  • Certain morphological changes observed
    in alveolar macrophages

17
  • Future

Respiratory deposition of Diesel
particles Susceptible subgroups (children,
asthmatics, COPD...) Low temperature of inhaled
air Different air masses ...
18
  • Tack för uppmärksamheten!

Sponsors
19
Accuracy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com