OECD Global Forum on Public Governance

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

OECD Global Forum on Public Governance

Description:

Bid rigging project (Chile and Brazil) and policy roundtables. Approved by OECD Competition ... They inform bidders about the illegality of bid rigging ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: aro76

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OECD Global Forum on Public Governance


1
OECD Global Forum on Public Governance
  • GUIDELINES FOR FIGHTING BID RIGGING
  • IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
  • Antonio Capobianco
  • Competition Division, OECD
  • Paris, 4 May 2009
  • Antonio.Capobianco_at_oecd.org

2
OECD Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging
  • Background
  • Bid rigging project (Chile and Brazil) and policy
    roundtables
  • Approved by OECD Competition Committee in
    February 2009
  • The document is not binding, but is based on best
    practices in OECD countries
  • Purpose
  • Help procurement officials design public tenders
    to reduce bid rigging (Design Checklist)
  • Help procurement officials detect bid rigging
    when it occurs (Detection Checklist)

3
Guidelines are available online and in various
languages
  • www.oecd.org/competition/bidrigging

4
Why Worry about Bid Rigging in Public Procurement?
  • Public procurement accounts for approx 15 of GDP
    in OECD countries
  • Bid rigging can raise prices significantly (up to
    20 or more)
  • gt POTENTIAL DAMAGES FOR TAX PAYERS CAN BE
    SIGNIFICANT !!

5
Bid Rigging Cases from Around the World
6
Bid Rigging Cases from Around the World
  • UK (Construction) 3000 contracts potentially
    affected for approx 3 billion 112 companies
    investigated.
  • Netherlands (Construction) more than 6oo
    companies investigates approx 100 million is
    fines levied.
  • Brazil (Security Guard Services) 12 companies
    involved fines for 15 of 2002 gross revenues
    involvement of trade association corruption
    issues.
  • United States (Milk for Public Schools)
    conspiracy extended to more than 18 states.

7
Checklist for Detecting Bid Rigging
  • Be alert for
  • Opportunities that bidders have to communicate
    with each other
  • Relationships among bidders (e.g. JVs and
    sub-contracting)
  • Suspicious bidding patterns (e.g. ABC, ABC) and
    pricing patterns (e.g. unexpectedly high prices
    or unexpectedly low discounts)
  • Unusual behavior (e.g. unjustified withdrawal
    from tender, submitting bid without required
    info)
  • Clues in documents submitted by different bidders

8
Example Clues in Documents
Please give us a call us if you have any
question.
9
Checklist for Designing Tenders
  • Learn about the market and your suppliers
  • Maximize participation of potential bidders
  • Define requirements clearly and avoid
    predictability
  • Reduce communication among bidders
  • Raise awareness of the risks of bid rigging,
    provide training

10
Example Certificate of Independent Bid
Determination (CIBD)
  • How to reduce communication among bidders? Use
    certificates of independent bid determination !
  • CIBD typically require each bidder to sign a
    statement under oath that
  • it has not agreed with its competitors about
    bids,
  • it has not disclosed bid prices to any of its
    competitors and
  • it has not attempted to convince a competitor to
    rig bids.
  • Successfully used by US and Canada. Other
    jurisdictions are following.

11
Advantages of CIBDs
  • They inform bidders about the illegality of bid
    rigging
  • They make prosecution of bid riggers easier
  • They add additional penalties, including possibly
    criminal penalties, for the filing of a false
    statement by the conspirators
  • They make prosecution of a firm that attempts to
    rig bids possible, even when other bidders do not
    agree to the proposed scheme

12
Example U.S. CIBD
  • Bid offeror must certify
  • (1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at
    independently, without, for the purpose of
    restricting competition, any consultation,
    communication, or agreement with any other
    offeror or competitor relating to (i) those
    prices, (ii) the intention to submit an offer, or
    (iii) the methods or factors used to calculate
    the prices offered
  • (2) The prices in this offer have not been and
    will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror,
    directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or
    competitor before bid opening (in the case of a
    sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in
    the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless
    otherwise required by law and
  • (3) No attempt has been made or will be made by
    the offeror to induce any other concern to submit
    or not to submit an offer for the purpose of
    restricting competition.
  • United States Federal Acquisition Regulation
    ("FAR"), 48 C.F.R. 52.203-2

13
Where to find the OECD Guidelines?
  • Material is available in the back of the room
  • Web link www.oecd.org/competition/bidrigging
  • Antonio Capobianco
  • (Antonio.Capobianco_at_oecd.org)
  • Ken Danger
  • (Ken.Danger_at_oecd.org)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)