Classroom Based Evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Classroom Based Evidence

Description:

Classroom Based Evidence – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: ldo70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Classroom Based Evidence


1
Classroom Based Evidence
  • November 29, 2005
  • Lexie Domaradzki

2
What do you know?
  • Tell the person to your right everything you know
    or have experienced regarding the CBEs.
  • I dont know anything is an okay answer.

3
Foundational information
  • Objectives for the day
  • 1. Become familiar with the content, format, and
    rubrics of the CBEs
  • 2. Identify difficult patterns of implementing
    the CBEs in the reading block
  • 3. Identify strategies to support a building in
    in the implementation of the CBEs
  • 4. Build an understanding of why this is a pilot
    year for this project

4
Where do the CBEs fit in the Reading system?
  • Why they were created.
  • How they were created
  • Where the fit in the total picture of the Reading
    System.

5
Why were they created?
  • 1. To align our weekly practice with our outcome
    measure of the 3rd grade WASL
  • 2. To ensure that students have regular practice
    with the cognitive demand that is expected in our
    state
  • 3. To give teachers a picture of how students
    will likely perform on the 3rd grade WASL

6
How were they created?
  • 1. An alignment expert was hired to lead the
    development team (Michelle Lewis)
  • 2. The team began with several days of training
    and then began by identifying state Learning
    Targets that are measured

7
How they were created.(contd)
  • 3. The team worked from an Item Development
    checklist (in handouts)
  • 4. Team identified learning target for each
    story, wrote questions for 2 pt. and 4 pt.
    responses.
  • 5. The team wrote a task specific rubric for
    each questions and gave examples for each point
    possible

8
How they were created.(contd)
  • 6. Each program had 2-4 writers identifying
    learning targets, developing the questions and
    the rubrics.
  • 7. Each program had 2-4 reviewers for accuracy,
    alignment with rubric, and format

9
Learning Targets
  • Writing team worked hard to be sure that all
    learning targets were covered.
  • Writing team worked hard to be sure the story
    could support the learning target.
  • In some core programs, some of our state learning
    targets are never taught.

10
How were the CBEs distributed?
  • Each reading program burned onto a cd
  • One cd mailed to Reading Coach at each building
  • Teacher materials and student materials are all
    on one cd.
  • All but two programs have both Multiple choice
    and short answer questions on test
  • Harcourt Trophies and Collections were both done
  • Open Court 2000 and 2002 are on one cd.

11
Things that we learned.
12
Lets take a look at the CBEs
  • Teachers materials
  • Learning target, item (question), rubric
    (examples
  • Format, content difficulty
  • Student materials
  • Item (question) and response area
  • Format, content difficulty

13
A further look.
  • Compare/contrast WASL sample tests and our pilot
    CBEs
  • Complete Venn diagram as a team for Sample
    tests/CBEs
  • WASL sample tests in left oval, CBEs in right
    oval, similarities in middle

14
Points of interest
  • Third grade WASL
  • No 4 point responses
  • All written responses scored on a 0-2 point
    rubric
  • 0-2 point rubric similar to 4th grade WASL in
    expectation of text based evidence
  • Multiple choice answers worth 1 point

15
Vocabulary
  • List words found in the questions of the CBEs
    and the WASL sample assessment that may be
    unfamiliar to your students.
  • 1. Post the words in the classroom
  • 2. Directly teach and discuss vocab words
  • 3. Show examples and non examples of answers
    utilizing the vocabulary

16
Implementing the CBEs
  • Very similar process that many of you began when
    the 4th grade WASL was implemented.
  • This process takes a very strong leader who holds
    firm on expectations and yet understands that
    this increased expectation will create
    dissonance.

17
4th grade WASL
  • When the 4th grade WASL began, what type of
    difficulties do your teachers and students have?
  • What has changed sine the beginning?
  • How did the transformation happen?

18
Lettermans Top Ten List
  • Letterman Top Ten list of comments from the
    Teachers Lounge about CBEs

19
Number 10
  • How am I supposed to translate this test score
    into a letter grade?
  • 8/8A
  • 7/8B
  • 6/8C
  • 5/8D
  • Eight points possible
  • Points earned divided by points possible
  • Example 6/8 points 75

20
Number 10
  • More importantly..
  • How are my students doing with multiple choice?
  • How are my students doing with short answer?
  • How likely are my students going to be able to
    hit the target in the spring?
  • What do I need to do to assist my students with
    increased performance?

21
Number 9
  • My students are failing all of their weekly
    tests. Am I really supposed to fail all my
    students?
  • Currently some core program say take any and all
    answers for story tests.
  • Strategies for increasing performance.

22
Strategies for increasing performance
  • 1. Model 1 short answer question, have students
    do one on own.
  • 2. Do not score test for several weeks until
    they are familiar with the format and
    expectations.
  • 3. Give students a chance to improve a response
    after you model a good answer.

23
Strategies for increasing performance
  • 4. Be sure that students use their books during
    the test.
  • 5. Be sure if it is a text to text question,
    that your students have read both pieces of text.
  • 6. Understand that this is an opportunity for
    them to experience, practice and become
    proficient at handling an outcome measure that is
    to come in the spring.

24
Number 8
  • The wording of these questions are not
    developmentally appropriate for 3rd graders.
  • After comparing the WASL sample test
  • How could you use the sample test to help you
    with this discussion in your building?

25
Number 7
  • I showed this test to another 3rd grade teacher
    and he gave it a completely different score.
  • Inter-rater reliability
  • Practice scoring sessions with grade level
  • 4th grade teacher helping with reliability
  • 3rd grade anchor papers

26
Number 6
  • This students answer really wasnt good enough
    for a 2, but I thought they deserved more than a
    1 so I gave them a 1.5
  • That score is out of alignment with the WASL
    expectations
  • The better question is what would it have taken
    for that student to score a 2? How can I give
    that student feedback so that they could hit the
    target next time?

27
Number 5
  • You cant expect a 3rd grade to extend
    information beyond the text. That is a higher
    level skill.

28
Number 4
  • I cant give this student full credit. They
    didnt write in complete sentences and misspelled
    the title of the story
  • 1. Examine the rubrics in the sample tests.
  • No mechanics are measured on the Reading
    Assessment
  • For the Reading Assessment, scoring must be
    aligned

29
Number 3
  • Open book tests do not measure students
    comprehension.
  • 1. Students need to be able to scan the text,
    not completely re-read it. If they comprehend
    the big ideas of the text, they can scan more
    quickly.
  • 2. Most assessments in our life give
    opportunities to re-visit the text.

30
Number 2
  • We should not be teaching to the test.
  • Format, cognitive demand, and aligned scoring
  • When students are familiar with these things,
    they actually spend their testing time activating
    comprehension, rather than trying to decipher
    what will be expected of them.

31
Number 1
  • Thank goodness we gave our students some
    experience with the CBEs. The opportunities
    they had to practice with format, cognitive
    demand, and scoring alignment really paid off.

32
Ways to introduce CBEs to your staff
  • 1. Run them off and put them in the teachers
    boxes (not, not, not recommended)
  • 2. Explain the purpose behind them, how they
    were created and the building plan for
    implementing them.
  • 3. Run off one test and compare/contrast them in
    a grade level meeting with WASL as we did here
  • 4. Find one or two teachers willing to test them
    out

33
Ways to introduce contd.
  • 5. Have teachers work with the CBEs for 4-6
    weeks and collect students papers.
  • 6. Teachers bring papers to grade level
    meetings to compare and see how students are
    doing.
  • 7. Be sure to utilize the feedback form with
    teachers so that we receive information on how to
    improve the CBEs next spring.
  • 8. Send a 3rd grade teacher to training on Jan.
    31 training for further work on data collection,
    data analysis and instruction implications of
    student papers.

34
Panel discussion
  • Hearing from peers who have begun to implement
    the CBEs.

35
Important considerations
  • CBEs are a support and a supplement to your
    third grade work.
  • If you are at risk for meeting the 3rd grade
    Continuation Criteria, CBEs probably will not be
    an area of focus for your teachers.
  • Excellent leaders know where to place priorities.
    CBEs may not be the highest priority in your
    building.
  • CBEs were provided for you as a tool of support,
    not a mandate or implementation expectation at
    this time.
  • This is a pilot year. We are asking the CBEs
    NOT distributed in your districts as there is
    necessary testing and reliability work that needs
    to be done with them. This is not available
    outside of Reading First at the time.

36
Planning together
  • If you have already begun implementing the CBEs,
    how did you set it up and what have you done? How
    did it work?
  • If you are just ready to begin, what will your
    plan be?
  • If you will not be placing CBEs on your priority
    radar, share the reason behind your decision.

37
Sharing with others
  • Line discussion
  • Already implemented
  • Planning to implement
  • Not a priority for this year

38
Future Professional Development Opportunities
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • 3 participants per school, coach, principal and 1
    teacher
  • Session taught by Lexie
  • Data collection
  • Data analysis
  • Adjusting instruction based on student work
  • Summer Institute
  • Session taught by Michelle Lewis
  • Data collection
  • Data analysis
  • Adjusting instruction based on student work

39
Foundational information
  • What do you understand now regarding
  • Objectives for the day
  • 1. Become familiar with the content, format, and
    rubrics of the CBEs
  • 2. Identify difficult patterns of implementing
    the CBEs in the reading block
  • 3. Identify strategies to support a building in
    in the implementation of the CBEs
  • 4. Build an understanding of why this is a pilot
    year for this project
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com