WAWFUIDRFID Questions Notes in Green

1
WAWF/UID/RFID Questions (Notes in Green)
2
WAWF Questions

• Requestor Milton Smith
• Will the new version handle Automated,
  Source-Source, Combo Documents with attachments?
• Tito fixed in 3.0.10
• Acceptance DoDAACs with extensions issued in
  WAWF. We have no way to determine what extension
  should be used for a particular contract or QA.
  Need some kind of tab provided. (When running
  ship-to DoDAAC for acceptors.)
• DCMA office should tell us which to use should
  have agreement in place for DCMA use. Problem
  relates to source inspection/destination
  acceptance. Ship-to does not have acceptor role
  but extensions do. This problem may have a
  procedural solution.
• Is there a link provided to see MOCAS data?
• Dont have notes as to an answer for this.
• Requestor Jeff Lulejian
• Are there any plans to include DD250s for support
  equipment in WAWF?
• Dave needs an example and an explanation for why
  cannot do now.

3
WAWF Questions (Continued)

• Requestor Eileen Bittner
• How will the next revision handle attachments and
  the Berry Amendment?

4
UID Questions

• Requestor Evelyn Franco
• Will amounts be required on UID parts?
  (Currently, we only put the amount on DD250s
  for foreign shipments and shipments to Northrop
  facilities.)
• UID - amt required UID clause requires you to
  get amount into registry. Have agreement with
  pgm office that if you can demonstrate system
  (procedure) that gets info into registry w/o
  being on dd250, then can use drop ship with no
  price, then we push price to registry. Wawf will
  allow us to submit uid with no price, then submit
  update to registry with price.