Sarah Tough, ippr, 2nd February 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Sarah Tough, ippr, 2nd February 2006

Description:

'The trust school concept will be widely ignored by the vast majority of ... shared ethos and identity/ brands' increased access to facilities. www.ippr.org ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: tgos
Category:
Tags: 2nd | ethos | february | ippr | sarah | tough

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sarah Tough, ippr, 2nd February 2006


1
Trusts A new future for schools? Thursday 2nd
February 2006
  • Sarah Tough, ippr, 2nd February 2006

2
Trusts A new future for schools?
  • The trust school concept will be widely ignored
    by the vast majority of heads and governors
  • - John Dunford, ASCL
  • there are fears that the Bill will lead to a
    fragmented and fractured education system
  • - John Bangs, NUT

3
Trusts A new future for schools?
  • Becoming a Trust school is a very simple way of
    making relationships with partners more
    sustainable, putting them on a firmer footing and
    ensuring more pupils have access to a wider range
    of opportunities.
  • - Trust School Prospectus
  • Not all schools have the same flexibilities.
    That causes confusion in the system. We are
    trying to bring some coherence to the system...
  • - Ruth Kelly

4
Characteristics
  • Independent state schools - trust schools, like
    foundation schools, will own their own assets,
    employ their own staff and be their own
    admissions authorities.
  • Governors - trusts will appoint governors for
    trust schools. Trusts can appoint either a
    minority or a majority of governors, depending on
    results of the consultation process. Some
    external partners already appoint school
    governors.

5
Characteristics
  • Power to Innovate trusts, like existing
    schools, can apply to the Secretary of State for
    additional flexibilities (e.g. freedoms over
    curriculum and pay/ conditions of staff enjoyed
    by academies).
  • Admissions own admissions authorities, must
    follow Code, no selection by ability.
  • Funding trust schools will be funded by LAs,
    like other state maintained schools. All trusts
    will be charities.

6
The potential of trusts
  • engine for real collaboration (DfES 2005)
  • long-term, sustainable involvement of partners in
    leadership
  • efficiency gains where trusts run more than one
    school
  • good practice and innovation spread throughout
    the trust schools easily
  • shared ethos and identity/ brands
  • increased access to facilities

7
Interested groups
  • Universities Exeter, Portsmouth, UWE, Open
    University
  • Businesses Microsoft, KPMG
  • Educational charities
  • Community groups
  • Other schools
  • Faith groups

8
Potential number of trust schools
  • Ruth Kelly we are working with a lot of
    organisations interested in setting up trusts
  • Trust schools, in law, are foundation schools
    with a foundation or a trust.
  • 513 foundation schools (January 2005)
  • some foundation schools already have their own
    foundation
  • Take up of foundation status slower than hoped/
    expected
  • Firms say no to trust schools (TES 25/11/05)

9
The process
(source Trust School Prospectus)
10
Who has the strategic overview?
11
Key questions
  • Can we envisage a future where all schools are
    trust schools?
  • Do we like this vision?
  • What safeguards are necessary to ensure trust
    schools development in a positive way?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com