Title: Financial Intermediation
1Financial Intermediation
- Lecture 6
- Major Risks Faced by Banks
2The nature of risk
- Risk is due to uncertainty so it is not the
same! - Ex post uncertainty and variability are the same,
but ex ante the two differ one can have a large
but certain variability - Risk can be diversified (to some extent), but
some of it will be around anyhow
3Major risks faced by banks
- Default of credit risk (A) Physical hazard
cash flow variations beyond the control of the
bank (screening) (B) Moral hazard monitoring - Interest rate risk by variations in market
prices (and prepayment risk think of mortgages) - Liquidity (withdrawal) risk
4Term structure of interest rates
- Yield curve yield to maturity (YTM) is defined
as the internal rate of return that equates the
PV of future cash flows from a bondholder to the
current market price - The yield curve is defined as the relationship
between YTM and the length of the time to
maturity for debt instruments of identical
default risk characteristics
5Yield curve under certainty
- Pmt price of a bond of maturity m at t
- imt YTM of .
- Face value 1, zero coupon
- So P10F/(1YTM) 1/(1i10)
- And P20 1/(1i10)2
- One can also invest at time t1 in a bond that
has the yield i11 - Arbitrage will lead to (1i20)2 (1i10)(1i11)
6Spot rates and Forward rates
- Spot rate Present price for future delivery
- Forward rate Future price for future delivery
- General formula for the YTM on a bond of
maturity n to be issued t period from now - Shape is determined expectations that short-term
interest rates will keep rising ? upward slope - interest rates will keep falling ? downward
slope
7Yield curve under uncertainty (1)
- Complication under uncertainty investors face
risk. A risk averse lender would require
compensation for bearing this risk - Modern arbitrage theory ruling out riskless
arbitrage in equilibrium, analyze as if
investors were risk neutral ? risk aversion
becomes irrelevant and the valuation is
preference free
8Yield curve under uncertainty (2)
- First think of the yield curve under certainty
- Inverting both sides to express in terms of
bond prices - Forward rates uncertain ? calculate expected
value by using probabilities (? as upstate
probability (1- ?) as downstate probability in
case of risk aversion we can calculate the risk
neutral probability ?)
9Term structure theory
- Theory no-arbitrage development of the term
structure - - The Expectations Theory
- - The Liquidity Preference Theory
- - Preferred Habitat Theory
10The Expectations Theory
- Unbiased Expectations Hypothesis states that
implied (one-period) forward rate for any
period in the future must equal the expected
spot rate on a one-period bond to be issued in
that future period. - This is inconsistent with the absence of
riskless arbitrage opportunities in
equilibrium ? under uncertainty the forward
rate can not be equal to the expected value of
the future spot rate
11The liquidity preference theory
- Investors demand a risk premium for holding
long-term bonds - Variability of bond prices increase with
maturity, liquidity premium does as well - Hypothesis does not assert that long term
yields must be higher than short term yield - Long-term bonds are not necessarily less liquid
than short term bonds ? liquidity premium is
more a term premium
12The Preferred Habitat Theory
- The bond with maturity closest to the
investors investment horizon will be viewed as
safest - Investors require a higher expected return form
bonds with different times to maturity - Theory violates no-arbitrage condition in
perfect capital markets - Preferred Habitat misses importance of risk
aversion
13Duration (1)
- Interest risk can be measured by duration and
duration-gap - Duration is the weighted-average time to
maturity using the relative PVs of the cash
flows as weights - Duration gap is the weighted duration of
equity (weighted duration of assets - weighted
duration of liabilities)
14Duration (2)
- General formula for duration
- CF Cash Flow at end op period t
- DF Discount Factor
15Duration (3)
- Economic interpretation D is the interest
elasticity of the securitys price to small
interest rate changes - Convexity measure of how much a bonds
price-yield curve deviates from a straight
line. Greater convexity, price of a bond will
fall more slowly as yields rise and rise faster
as yields fall
16Duration (4)
- Convexity factors that increase convexity
- Decreasing coupon
- Decreasing yield
- Increasing maturity
- Thus zero-coupon bonds with long maturities will
have high convexity.
17Duration (5)
- Duration gap
- - Positive gap FIs net worth will decline if
the entire yield curve moves up and will
increase if the entire curve moves down - - Negative gap Opposite
- Maturity gap
- Although maturities may be perfectly matched,
timings of cash flows may not be matched ?
Better to use duration
18Liquidity risk
- The risk of being unable to satisfy claims with
impairment to its financial or reputational
capital - Informational asymmetry about asset quality
plays an important role in creating liquidity
risk - Duration mismatching is an important, but not a
necessary ingredient for interest risk
19Credit risk analysis factors
- Capacity borrower has legal and economic
capacity to borrow - Character borrowers reputation
- Capital resolves private information and moral
hazard problems - Collateral additional reduction of risk, it can
signal quality, and reduce moral hazard - Economic conditions that determine the borrowers
capacity to repay
20Credit analysis sources of information
- Internal interview with applicant and banks own
records - External Borrowers financial statements, credit
information brokers, other banks! - One can use loan covenants special clauses
designed to protect the bank and prohibit the
borrower from taking actions that could adversely
influence the likelihood of repayment
21Complete contingent contract
- Amount of repayment/or additional loan
- Interest rate on the remaining debt
- Possible adjustment in the collateral required by
the lender - Actions (e.g. investment decisions) to be
undertaken by the borrower - All in all states of nature at each possible
date!
22Loan design
- Loans are typically incomplete contracts
- What should be taken care of in a contract and
what kind of actions can be undertaken by
governing the loan? - A typical loan contract includes the repayment
and collateral requirements only what is the
theoretical foundation?
23Theory of symmetric risk sharing
- Suppose we have a lender with utility function uL
and a borrower with utility function uB. At date
0 the borrower invests L and gets a return ye at
date 1. The borrower has no wealth and the lender
provides a loan L - What is the optimal repayment function R(y)?
24Symmetric risk sharing (2)
- We assume that there is limited liability
0 ? R(y) ? y. The borrower gets y - R(y). - The problem is max EuB (ye - R(ye) given EuL
(R(ye)) ? UL0 and 0 ? R(y) ? y - We could also maximize EuL (R(ye)) given EuB
(ye - R(ye)) ? UB0 and 0 ? R(y) ? y - The utility functions are Von Neumann-Morgenstern,
monotonically increasing
25Symmetric Risk Sharing (3)
- It is easy to see that the FOC reads
uB (y - R(y)) - ? uL (R(y)) 0,
taking logs gives - log(uB (y-R(y))) - log(uL (R(y))) - log ? 0
- Differentiate with respect to y gives
- uB/uB (Y - R(y)) (1 - R(y))
uL/uL (R(y)) R(y) 0 - Define IB -uB (x) / uB (x) and
IL -uL (x) / uL (x)
26Symmetric Risk Sharing (4)
- R(y) IB (y-R(y)) / IB (y-R(y)) IL (y)
- So R(y)1/1IL/IB. So if IL 0, a risk
neutral lender, R(y) 1. If IB/IL is large the
cash-flow sensitivity of the repayment is large - This is not a realistic banking case R(y)R
would be more common, or R(y) min (y,R) with
limited liability - So we need to know more about managing risk