Accounts Receivable Check Truncation in the Real World - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Accounts Receivable Check Truncation in the Real World

Description:

The NACHA Operating Rules for Accounts Receivable Entries (ARC) became effective ... Comply with NACHA rules, REG E, UCC, and revised Title 31 of CFR part 210, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: josephd56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accounts Receivable Check Truncation in the Real World


1
Accounts Receivable Check Truncation in the Real
World
  • Presented by
  • Sandra Celis, AAP
  • Assistant Vice President, Destin Bank the
    Financial Centre
  • Joseph D. Korinek
  • Chief Information Officer, Global eTelecom

2
Overview
  • Background
  • Pilot Rules
  • New Rules
  • Impact of Rule Changes
  • Implementation of ARC
  • Pilot Program Case Study
  • Questions Answers

3
Background
  • The NACHA Operating Rules for Accounts Receivable
    Entries (ARC) became effective on March 15, 2002
    replacing the Lockbox Pilot that had been running
    since December 1999.

4
Pilot Rules
  • Checks were subject to NACHA Operating Rules, UCC
    and Reg CC
  • Checks were not Reg E items
  • Convert only checks received by US Mail
  • Original Check needed to be retained for 90 days
    image stored for 7 years
  • ACH SEC Code was PPD
  • Some ODFI Reporting Needed for Pilot

5
New Rules
  • Now falls under NACHA Operating Rules, Electronic
    Funds Transfer Act
  • Check is Now a Reg E item (Check is a source
    document)
  • New ACH SEC Code of ARC
  • Must destroy check within 14 days of presentment,
    image stored for 2 years.
  • Now accept U.S. Mail and Lock Box items
  • Notice is now considered Authorization

6
Impact of Changes to Rules
  • Change to Reg E item streamlines process makes
    ARC consistent with other e-check applications
  • Allowing Lock Box in addition to U.S. Mail
    improves merchant acceptance
  • Notice vs. Authorization improves merchant
    acceptance
  • Lack of ability to process corporate checks slows
    merchant acceptance

7
Implementation of ARC
  • Changes to Entry Detail Record
  • ODFI Requirements
  • RDFI Requirements
  • 3rd Party Processor Requirements
  • Originator Requirements

8
Changes to Entry Detail Record
  • Standard Entry Class was PPD, now ARC
  • Field 7 is now Check Serial Number and is now
    mandatory

9
ODFI Requirements
  • Warrant Originators are
  • Complying with rules
  • Providing Amount, Routing Number, Account Number
    and Check Serial Number in accordance with source
    document (Check)
  • Meeting retention and destruction requirements

10
RDFI Requirements
  • Returns by 2nd banking day following settlement
  • Some exceptions allow 60 calendar days following
    settlement
  • Authorization Revoked (R07)
  • Stop Payment (R08)
  • Improper source document (R10)
  • Source Document presented for payment (R37)
  • Check Serial number required on Consumers
    Statement

11
3rd Party Processor Requirements
  • Comply with NACHA rules, REG E, UCC, and revised
    Title 31 of CFR part 210, etc.
  • Validate routing numbers, account numbers, check
    amounts and serial numbers
  • Comply with ACH format requirements for ARC
  • Assist ODFI with exception handling

12
Originator Requirements
  • Provide Notice on Lock Box and Billing Statements
  • Provide Opt-Out for customers (no longer
    required, but a good business practice)
  • Comply with retention and destruction requirements

13
Pilot Program Case Study
  • A Utility Company
  • Started processing December 11th 2001
  • Still processing, now using new rules
  • Started with low volume, increased volume as
    company grew accustomed with technology and
    process

14
The Problem
  • Utility used essentially all manual processes
  • Recently upgraded to new billing software
  • Employee resistance to change present
  • Checks being copied by hand on copier for storage

15
The Solution
  • Convert manual data entry to automation
  • Integrate ACH process into new billing software
  • Overcome employee resistance to change
  • Maintain existing process as closely as possible
  • Eliminate duplicate data entry

16
The Implementation
  • Deployed initial solution within two months of
    approval to proceed
  • Used a Project Plan approach to deployment and
    integration with existing systems
  • Empowered employees in the process to reduce
    resistance to change
  • Clearly defined changed and new processes
  • Employed continuous process improvement

17
The Result
  • Automation significantly reduced labor
  • Opt-Outs were approximately 3
  • Returns were less than 1
  • Available software tools insufficient for ARC
    new software tools were developed to maximize
    benefits
  • Employee resistance overcome by responsiveness to
    feedback and training

18
The Future
  • Continue improving the tools
  • Develop multiple solutions for various industries
    and volumes
  • Improve training and deployment
  • Market new capabilities
  • Push for changes to rules for corporate checks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com