Living Situation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Living Situation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Study

Description:

Suzanne Penna, Ph.D. Tessa Hart, Ph.D. John Corrigan, Ph.D. Nichole Carlson, Ph.D. ... National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant H133A980010 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: davidsa3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Living Situation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Study


1
Living Situation Following Traumatic Brain
Injury A Longitudinal Study
  • Tom Novack, Ph.D.

2
Acknowledgments
  • Suzanne Penna, Ph.D.
  • Tessa Hart, Ph.D.
  • John Corrigan, Ph.D.
  • Nichole Carlson, Ph.D.
  • Miranda Grote, B.S.

3
Funding Support
  • National Institute of Disability and
    Rehabilitation Research Grant H133A980010
    Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Project

4
A Simple Question
  • How does living situation change following
    traumatic brain injury?

5
Defining Living Situation
  • Living situation implies something about
    independence
  • Living by oneself or with non-related people
  • Living with parents
  • Living with a spouse or significant other
  • Living in a facility

6
Prior Research Findings
  • Vogenthaler et al (1989) N75, 4-7 years post
    injury
  • Age, pre-injury residence, and amount of rehab
    were predictors of current residence
  • Bruzuzy Corrigan (1996) N64, 4-10 years
    post injury
  • Age, pre-injury residence, education, and
    current income were predictors of current
    residence

7
Living Situation Following TBI
  • This is an area that needs to be researched.
    Two aims of the study
  • Document change in living situation over time
    following TBI
  • Determine what factors are associated with
    return to living alone or with a
    spouse/significant other

8
Living Situation Following TBI
  • The TBI MS provides a dataset that can be used to
    answer such questions
  • Large pooling of subjects from across the country
  • Collected longitudinally
  • Standard data collection procedures employed
  • Availability of multiple predictors and the
    sample size to examine them

9
Participant Sample 1
  • Participants who completed follow-up interviews
    at 1, 2, and 5 years after injury
  • Data was used from all 16 TBIMS sites resulting
    in a total sample size of 900.

10
Participant Sample 2
  • The entire sample (N 7,925) excluding
  • Those who expired prior to discharge
  • Those who have not yet reached 1 year following
    injury
  • Participated in at least one follow-up interview
    (1, 2, and/or 5 years after injury)
  • Analysis sample of 6,933 cases
  • 853 were not yet eligible for 2 year follow-up
  • 2,296 were not yet eligible for 5 year follow-up

11
Participant Sample
  • The data was grouped for analysis in the
    following way
  • 1- Living Alone or with roommate at time of
    injury
  • 2- Living with spouse/partner at time of injury
  • 3- Living with parents or adult children at time
    of injury
  • 4-Living in a facility at the time of injury

12
Demographics
Percent (except for age)
13
Living AloneSample 1
Percent of Sample
14
Residing with a SpouseSample 1
Percent of Sample
15
Living with ParentsSample 1
Percent of Sample
16
Living in a FacilitySample 1
Percent of Sample
17
Outcome Over 5 YearsSample 1
  • Living alone prior to injury, discharged to
    family , transitioning to living alone

Percentage
18
Outcome Over 5 YearsSample 1
  • Participants who were living with parents prior
    to injury transitioning to living alone or with a
    spouse

Percentage
19
Outcome Over 5 YearsSample 1
  • Discharged to a facility, remaining in a facility
    at follow-up

Percentage
20
Logistic Regression FindingsSample 1
  • At all time points, premorbid living situation
    was most predictive of current living situation
  • Younger patients were more likely to be living
    with parents at 1,2 and 5 years post-injury
  • The poorer the FIM score at hospital discharge,
    the greater likelihood of living with parents or
    in a facility at 1,2 and 5 years.

21
Generalized Logit AnalysisSample 2
  • Logistic regression models are fitted to the data
    comparing outcome to living alone prior to injury
  • Odds ratios are generated
  • The entire sample of 6,933 cases are analyzed
  • The results were similar reassuring us that using
    a subset of subjects with 5 years of follow up
    did not bias our results.

22
So, Whats the Point?
  • Using the TBI MS database to derive information
    that is helpful to survivors of TBI, family
    members, and care providers
  • What can be expected in the future regarding
    living situation?
  • For someone living independently at the time of
    injury
  • For someone living with parents at the time of
    injury
  • For someone who is discharged to the care of
    parents
  • For someone who is discharged to a facility

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com