South Carolina - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

South Carolina

Description:

'Designed not to predict what will happen... With uncertainty, policy-makers will invariably get different results with forecast ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: SJOH73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: South Carolina


1
South Carolina Sentencing Reform
Commission Projecting the Impact of Our
Proposed Reforms
John Speir, Ph.D. Applied Research Services,
Inc. June 27, 2009
2
Defining a Projected Impact
Designed not to predict what will happen but
rather explore what would happen if assumptions
unfold in different ways... Donella Meadows
Thinking in Systems A Primer, 2008
3
Why Forecast the Future? How Do We Know our
Reforms will Work?
  • Conduct legislative policy impact analyses
  • Assess the impact of resources on efficiency and
    operations

4
Projections
  • Assess financial impact of agency, court,
    legislative decisions

5
Simulation
  • Answer what if questions
  • Can test every aspect of a proposed change
  • Can explore new policies or operating procedures
    without the expense disruption of experimenting
    on the real system

6
Simulation
  • Reduces the emotion associated with hard
    decisions
  • What is the probability associated with possible
    consequences? (also called a risk profile)
  • With uncertainty, policy-makers will invariably
    get different results with forecast

7
What is Micro-Simulation?
  • Actual offender records are read into the model
    Past Admissions Active Inmates
  • Inmate records are re-built based on policy
    scenario
  • Create a new sentence or LOS outcome for any
    policy group of interest

8
Flow of Offenders Through the Model
Past Inmate Admissions 2008-09
What Do We Know?
Uncertainty??
  • Mandatory minimums
  • 2. Inmates who have already been released
  • Past institutional behavior and projected release
    date
  • Past Board Decisions
  • Past Institutional Conduct
  • Historical Sentencing time-served
  • Future Admissions
  • Future Parole Board decisions
  • Future Institutional conduct among active
  • Inmates with extended prison terms
  • Product failure (returns to prison)
  • Demographics
  • Prior History
  • Current Offense
  • Sentence Length
  • Geography
  • Parole Data
  • Admission Type
  • Etc.

9
Known Outcomes Residual Uncertainty
85 - No Parole Mandatory Minimums Already
Released Inmates Historical max out LOS
for Short-term inmates
Simulated Estimates Needed
Future conduct for long stay inmates Board
Decisions Change in Admissions New Admits Or
Revocations
10
How Do You Project Future Admissions?
History SCDC Inmate Admits 2005 13,234 2006
13,397 2007 13,906 2008 13,950
11
Future admissions are still a major uncertainty
But We look for collateral data and
methods/tools to help project the future (status
quo)
12
What about proposals without any historical
data?
  • Pennsylvania High Speed chase law was split into
    two groups.
  • High Speed chase
  • High speed chase under the influence or involves
    an out-of-state pursuit

13
Review CCH or Sentencing Report
  • What percent () were charged/convicted of a DUI
  • What percent () occurred in out an out-of-state
    jurisdiction
  • We set up a range (35 to 45) and ran the model
    hundreds of times to identify the most likely
    impact

14
Think in Terms of What-if Policy Scenarios
Policy Groups
15
Policy Scenarios Policy Groups
  • What would happen if we could divert just 15 of
    the inmates with a specific offense and profile?
  • What would happen if we used the prison term
    instead of the total sentence to set the parole
    eligibility date?

16
Think in Terms of What-if Policy Scenarios
Policy Groups
  • Judges used a bench book summarizing state
    sentencing practices and judges sentenced just
    30 of the sentences in the middle sentencing
    range?
  • What if we could divert simple drug users
    from prison?

17
Strategy
  • Create a status quo projection that take into
    account anticipated changes in prison admissions
  • Status quo projection serves as the baseline for
    all proposed reforms
  • (individually and collectively)

18
Strategy
  • Define the proposals and policy groups
    sufficiently to assign a cost estimate
  • Example Driving under suspension would be a
    minimum security bed
  • Each proposal is evaluated using conservative
    estimates and is simulated hundreds of times
    using different error rates

19
Visit our web site at www.ars-corp.com or
call (404) 881-1120
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com