Guest Lecture Taxation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Guest Lecture Taxation

Description:

Of this about 60% was in untied grants and 40% in specific purpose grants. ... Like the financial assistance grants, the GST is untied ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: u48

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Guest Lecture Taxation


1
Guest Lecture Taxation
  • Dr. Maria Racionero
  • School of Economics

2
Overview
  • Tax design versus tax reform
  • Recent reforms
  • Fiscal federalism
  • Commonwealth-State financial arrangements
  • Globalisation and fiscal competition
  • New international tax arrangements

3
Tax design versus tax reform
  • Who bears the burden of a tax?
  • What determines the welfare loss of taxation?
  • What are the desirable properties of a tax
    system?
  • Should production be taxed?
  • What are the main tax options?
  • What is the best overall system of taxes?
  • How can an existing tax system be improved?

4
Who bears the burden of a tax?
  • Tax incidence is the study of who bears the
    burden of a tax
  • Tax burden is the true economic weight of the tax
  • The burden of a tax falls more heavily on the
    side of the market that is less elastic

5
What determines the welfare loss of taxation?
  • An increase in taxes makes individuals worse off
  • But some taxes reduce individuals welfare less,
    for each dollar of revenue raised, than do others
  • Tax policy is concerned with designing tax
    structures that minimize welfare loss for any
    given amount of revenue raised

6
What are other desirable properties of a tax
system?
  • Administrative simplicity the tax system ought
    to be easy and relatively inexpensive to
    administer
  • Flexibility the tax system ought to be able to
    respond easily to changed economic circumstances
  • Political responsibility the tax system should
    be designed so that individuals can ascertain
    what they are paying, and evaluate how accurately
    the system reflects their preferences
  • Fairness

7
What is a fair tax system?
  • Horizontal equity Individuals who are identical
    (or in essentially similar economic
    circumstances) should be treated the same
  • Vertical equity Individuals who have greater
    ability to pay should pay more taxes

8
What should be the basis of taxation?
  • Income an indirect and imperfect measure of both
    ability to pay and economic well-being
  • Consumption seems fairer than income (it
    measures what one takes out of society rather
    that what one contributes)
  • Benefit individuals should contribute in the
    proportion of the benefits received

9
Should production be taxed?
  • Economic welfare is maximised if the economy is
    maintained on the PPF
  • Government should not alter the prices that
    producers face in trades between themselves
    (i.e., there should be no taxation on trade
    between firms)
  • Taxes on income or consumption can achieve
    desired welfare outcomes more efficiently

10
What are the main tax options?
  • Lump sum taxes No efficiency cost, but
    generally inequitable
  • Income taxes
  • General, linear or non-linear ? taxes savings
    twice!
  • Non-linear differential
  • Consumption taxes
  • General expenditure tax, linear or non-linear
  • Uniform value added tax
  • Uniform retail tax
  • Differential commodity taxes (by VAT or retail)

11
What is the best overall system of taxes?
  • Both income and commodity taxes have
    disadvantages and combining them may be
    beneficial
  • Optimal tax models that attempt to determine the
    optimal combination are complex. However, some
    general principles emerge

12
What are the main principles of taxation?
  • Tax revenue is raised most efficiently by taxing
    factors or goods with inelastic supply or demand
  • In the absence of lump sum taxes, tax creates
    excess burdens and a strict target-instrument
    approach may be inefficient. The optimal policy
    for any tax depends on the availability and
    levels of other taxes

13
What are the implications of these tax
principles?
  • When sources of income and factors of production
    are highly substitutable, there are efficiency
    benefits in taxing all sources at the same rate
  • An income tax penalises savings. However, an
    expenditure tax raises less revenue that an
    income tax with the same nominal rate and is
    generally more inequitable
  • Whether an income tax or an expenditure tax is
    preferable depends very importantly on the size
    of the distortions, but it is generally accepted
    that income taxes are superior

14
Should commodity taxes be included?
  • Commodity taxation captures income that may
    otherwise evade tax
  • It may provide a more efficient relief for
    savings than a differential income tax system
    that taxes income from savings at a lower rate
  • It may be considered fairer to tax what
    individuals take out of the economic system

15
If commodity taxes are included, what is the
optimal form?
  • When demand elasticities are similar across
    commodities, for any revenue target, a broad set
    of low tax rates is preferable
  • However, when demand elasticities vary
    significantly, differential tax rates, in inverse
    relation to the price elasticity of demand,
    reduce the excess burden

16
How can an existing tax system be improved?
  • In practice, if the derived optimal tax rules
    were to be implemented it would be likely that a
    major change of the fiscal structure would be
    required
  • Many countries, including Australia, have opted
    instead in favour of gradual policy reforms which
    involve slowly phasing in some taxes and removing
    others

17
Recent reforms in Australia
  • Introduction of FBT Sept 1985
  • Introduction of CGT Sept 1985
  • Full imputation for company tax July 1987
  • Introduction of CGT discount, abolition of
    indexation averaging Sept 1999
  • Abolition of wholesales sales tax July 2000
  • Introduction of GST July 2000
  • Introduction of consolidation regime July 2002

18
GST
  • Major tax reform that took place in July 2002
  • Why?
  • The Wholesale Sales Tax (WST) introduced in the
    1930s taxed a narrow range of goods, but did not
    directly tax services (over two thirds of
    Australias economic activity)
  • Personal tax rates believed to be too high and
    complicated tax laws and loopholes allowed those
    who could afford financial advice to avoid paying
    their fair share

19
Indeed, a bundle of reforms
  • Reforms to the income tax and social security
  • Reforms to the indirect tax and State finances
  • Reform to business taxation
  • Reform to tax administration

20
Reform to the income tax and social security
  • Why?
  • Disincentive effects of high income tax rates
  • Unfairness through tax minimisation
  • Complexity (in particular, lack of integration
    between the income tax and the social security
    system)
  • How?
  • Lower income tax rates
  • Reform of family assistance
  • Increase in social security payments

21
Reforms to indirect tax and State finances
  • Why?
  • WST outdated
  • Inefficient State excise duties and fiscal
    imbalance
  • How?
  • Abolishing inefficient indirect taxes
  • Introducing a GST
  • Giving all GST revenue to the States
  • Reforming excise duties

22
Reforms to business taxes
  • Why?
  • Business tax outdated
  • Inconsistent entity treatment, inappropriate
    taxation of company groups and inconsistent
    treatment of distributions
  • Incoherent framework
  • How?
  • Reforming taxation of business entities
  • Reforming taxation of business investments
  • Review of business taxation

23
Reforms to entities taxation
  • Taxing trusts like companies
  • Addressing tax minimisation
  • Moving towards consolidation
  • Achieving consistent treatment of company
    distributions

24
Reform to tax administration
  • Why?
  • High costs of dealing with many bodies of
    administration
  • Inflexible and arbitrary business payment
  • Inefficient and outdated withholding systems
  • Complex tax laws
  • Increasing size of underground economy
  • How?
  • Improving business registration system (through
    ABN)
  • Introducing one tax instalment system for all tax
    payers
  • Improving certainty and reliability of advice
  • Simplifying tax returns and integrating the tax
    code
  • Reducing tax avoidance

25
Fiscal federalism
  • What economic functions and tax powers should be
    allocated to each level of government?
  • Is there an optimal multilevel system of
    government?
  • What principles should govern inter-government
    financial relations?

26
What economic functions should be allocated to
each level?
  • Government has three main functions
    macroeconomic stabilisation, income distribution
    and resource allocation when markets fail
  • Central government is best placed for
    macroeconomic stabilisation and
    redistribution/welfare policy
  • The major function of local government is the
    provision of local public goods

27
How should taxes be allocated to different levels
of government?
  • Distributional concerns
  • Allocative efficiency the allocation should
    minimize DWL
  • Fiscal adequacy the allocation should provide
    adequate funding for each level of government
  • Accountability the allocation should take into
    account the preferences of citizens

28
Vertical fiscal imbalancefiscal adequacy and
accountability
  • The central government is the most efficient
    taxer of the most important tax bases (income and
    consumption)
  • This creates vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) -
    one level of government raises more revenue that
    it requires for its own purposes and another
    level of government raises less than it needs
  • Central government is likely to overspend or
    place conditions on grants that are inconsistent
    with local preferences

29
What are the equity issues in taxation with
multilevel government?
  • Local taxes are often regressive - in order to
    retain their tax base, local government must
    attract and retain higher income households
  • Local government have unequal capacity to provide
    public services. This is known as horizontal
    fiscal imbalance (HFI), which arises because of
  • differences in the revenue raising capacity, and
  • differences in expenditure needs

30
Is there an optimal multilevel system of
government?
  • Tiebout hypothesis a competitive system of local
    governments could provide an efficient outcome
    with no need for government intervention
  • However, Tiebout conditions do not fully apply in
    Australia there are few states and household
    movement between them is expensive

31
Commonwealth-Staterelations
  • Commonwealth provides national public goods and
    social security benefits, plus grant financial
    assistance to any State
  • The States are the main public providers of
    services to the Community including law and
    order, primary and secondary education, most
    health services, and regional economic
    infrastructure services
  • Local government provides several local services
    (local roads, parks, libraries )

32
Tax revenue by level of government 2001-02






State and local tax revenue 31.0















Commonwealth tax revenue 69.0
33
Commonwealth government tax revenue 2003-04
Fringe benefits tax 1.8
Indirect taxes 16.2
Agricultural Levies and Other taxes 0.9
Income tax Superannuation 3.3
Income tax Companies and PRRT 21.6
Income tax individuals and other withholding 56.
2

34
State and local government tax revenue 2001-02
Taxes on motor vehicles 6.4
Other 0.5
Insurance tax 4.2
Gambling tax 5.5
GST 40.6
Taxes on immovable property 14.1
Taxes on financial and capital transactions 14.4
Employers payroll tax 14..3

35
What are the implications of this breakdown of
tax revenue?
  • The Commonwealth raises much more revenue that it
    spends on its own programs whereas State
    governments raise less than they are required to
    spend
  • The degree of VFI is large compared with other
    federations

36
How are the VFI and HFI tackled?
  • In the 2002-03 budget, the Commonwealth
    government forecasted that it would provide 54
    billion to the states by way of
    inter-governmental grants. Of this about 60 was
    in untied grants and 40 in specific purpose
    grants. About two thirds of tied grants are
    directed to education and health
  • Inter-governmental cross-subsidies are large NSW
    and Victoria are the main contributors to
    revenue South Australia, Tasmania and Northern
    Territory are the major beneficiaries

37
Recent changes in the federal tax-arrangements
  • The tax changes introduced in July 2000 had a
    significant effect on federal-state tax
    arrangements
  • Income from the GST replaced general purpose
    grants (financial assistance grants) and
    revenue from some taxes that the States gave up.
    Like the financial assistance grants, the GST is
    untied
  • The Commonwealth distributes GST revenue to the
    states on the basis of horizontal fiscal
    equalisation principles

38
Other Commonwealth payments to state and local
governments
  • The Commonwealth also provides general revenue
    assistance in three main categories
  • Budget Balancing Assistance (BBA) grants
  • National Competition Payments (NPCs)
  • Special Revenue Assistance (SRA)
  • Specific purpose payments are payments for policy
    purposes that relate to particular functional
    activities, such as health or education

39
GST revenue provision and total Commonwealth
payments to state/local sector 2003-04 estimates
40
Is the Australian federal system an efficient
multilevel system?
  • The allocation of functions is broadly as would
    be expected. However, there is much overlap of
    responsibilities and duplication of services
    (National Commission of Audit, 1996),
    particularly in health and education
  • The Commonwealth controls the major tax bases
    income and consumption. Note that although the
    Commonwealth describes the GST as a state tax,
    the Commonwealth decides how this revenue will be
    allocated between the states

41
What are the implications of this control of
major tax bases?
  • A high degree of VFI which is not conducive to
    accountability and efficiency in government
  • The states reliance on a mixed bag of taxes
    (payroll taxes on medium and large firms, stamp
    duties on the exchange of assets (mainly
    property), motor vehicle taxes, taxes on
    insurance and on gambling, taxes on the turnover
    of financial institutions and land taxes) which
    do not provide an efficient tax system

42
Globalisation and fiscal competition
  • In what ways does globalisation affect government
    revenue and expenditure?
  • Globalisation may reduce government expenditures
  • Increases the mobility of factors of production
  • Modern technology facilitates the worldwide
    movement of money and increases the possibility
    of tax evasion
  • Tariff reductions reduce taxes on trade

43
What is the evidence?
  • Globalisation appears to have had little impact
    in government revenue . However,
  • Tax revenue is the product of tax base and tax
    rate(s)
  • Globalisation may affect the structure of taxes,
    with low tax rates on mobile factors and high on
    immobile factors
  • Tax revenues depend also on the demand for
    government services

44
How does globalisation affect taxes on production?
  • The more mobile is the factor the more easily it
    can escape taxation
  • The principal hypothesis of the tax competition
    literature is that tax rates on mobile factors of
    production (like capital) will fall and tax rates
    on more immobile factors (like labour and land)
    will rise

45
Capital
  • Two types of capital financial (portfolio) and
    real or FDI, where portfolio capital is more
    mobile than FDI
  • In theory, interest on portfolio capital is
    liable to personal income tax because governments
    can tax their own residents on their worldwide
    income. However, cross-border investments often
    evade tax
  • Income generated by FDI is taxed through company
    income tax. Tax competition might be expected to
    reduce corporate rates and to create convergence
    of rates

46
What is the evidence?
  • The average rate of corporate income tax in the
    25 OECD countries fell from 43.5 in 1986 to
    33.2 in 1998. In Australia, government reduced
    the corporate tax rate from 39 in 1988 to 30 in
    2001-02
  • Tax rates converged range between the highest
    and the lowest tax rate from 28 to 20, and the
    standard deviation from 7 to 4.5

47
Labour
  • Labour is less mobile
  • However, skilled high-income workers are usually
    in international demand and can afford the
    transaction costs of relocation
  • In the last 20 years, there has been a worldwide
    decline in the progressivity of income tax
    structures

48
How does globalisation affect taxes on
consumption?
  • Consumption activities are generally less mobile
  • Accordingly, we would expect globalisation to
    lead to an increase in consumption taxes and user
    charges
  • OECD countries, including Australia, have
    significantly increased consumption taxes,
    notably by the use of VAT (or GST)
  • Shifts in the tax structure away from taxation of
    capital and labour income to consumption affect
    the burden of taxation

49
How does tax competition affect economic
efficiency?
  • When capital is immobile, there is no DWL due to
    loss of capital
  • When capital is mobile across jurisdictions the
    marginal social cost of taxation includes the
    loss of output that arises when capital moves
    abroad to escape the tax burden
  • However, this model assumes that income from
    capital is taxed at its source rather than at its
    destination

50
Source vs destination principle
  • When tax rates at sources differ, taxation of
    income at source distorts the flow of capital and
    investment decisions
  • If income is taxed according to the destination
    (or residence) principle, a residents worldwide
    capital income is taxed at the same rate,
    regardless of its source. The worldwide
    allocation of capital, and hence production
    efficiency, is then independent of local tax
    rates

51
Is the Australian system destination or source
based?
  • Under Australian legislation most income is taxed
    under the destination (residence) principle ?
    Law-abiding owners of capital have no tax
    incentive to move capital overseas
  • The Australian government also taxes income from
    Australian sources that accrues to foreigners ? A
    source based element that may discourage foreign
    capital and distort the worldwide allocation of
    capital and productive efficiency

52
New International Tax Arrangements Bill 2003
  • Balancing residence and source taxation
    Bilateral tax treaties, controlled foreign
    company (CFC), foreign investment fund (FIF),
    transferor trust, transfer-pricing, thin
    capitalisation
  • Taxing inbound investment source taxation of
    capital income
  • Taxing outbound investment residence taxation of
    capital income
  • Taxing conduit income

53
References and further reading
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2000) Economics of the Public
    Sector, 3rd edition, W. W. Norton
  • Abelson, P. (2003) Public Economics principles
    and practice, Applied Economics, Sydney

54
Tax policy papers
  • Tax reform Not a new tax, a new tax system
  • GST legislation
  • Commonwealth-State funding
  • Review of Business Taxation
  • New Business Tax System
  • Entity Taxation and Consolidation
  • Review of International Tax Arrangements
  • New International Tax Arrangements Bill 2003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)