Title: Guest Lecture Taxation
1Guest Lecture Taxation
- Dr. Maria Racionero
- School of Economics
2Overview
- Tax design versus tax reform
- Recent reforms
- Fiscal federalism
- Commonwealth-State financial arrangements
- Globalisation and fiscal competition
- New international tax arrangements
3Tax design versus tax reform
- Who bears the burden of a tax?
- What determines the welfare loss of taxation?
- What are the desirable properties of a tax
system? - Should production be taxed?
- What are the main tax options?
- What is the best overall system of taxes?
- How can an existing tax system be improved?
4Who bears the burden of a tax?
- Tax incidence is the study of who bears the
burden of a tax - Tax burden is the true economic weight of the tax
- The burden of a tax falls more heavily on the
side of the market that is less elastic
5What determines the welfare loss of taxation?
- An increase in taxes makes individuals worse off
- But some taxes reduce individuals welfare less,
for each dollar of revenue raised, than do others
- Tax policy is concerned with designing tax
structures that minimize welfare loss for any
given amount of revenue raised
6What are other desirable properties of a tax
system?
- Administrative simplicity the tax system ought
to be easy and relatively inexpensive to
administer - Flexibility the tax system ought to be able to
respond easily to changed economic circumstances - Political responsibility the tax system should
be designed so that individuals can ascertain
what they are paying, and evaluate how accurately
the system reflects their preferences - Fairness
7What is a fair tax system?
- Horizontal equity Individuals who are identical
(or in essentially similar economic
circumstances) should be treated the same - Vertical equity Individuals who have greater
ability to pay should pay more taxes
8What should be the basis of taxation?
- Income an indirect and imperfect measure of both
ability to pay and economic well-being - Consumption seems fairer than income (it
measures what one takes out of society rather
that what one contributes) - Benefit individuals should contribute in the
proportion of the benefits received
9Should production be taxed?
- Economic welfare is maximised if the economy is
maintained on the PPF - Government should not alter the prices that
producers face in trades between themselves
(i.e., there should be no taxation on trade
between firms) - Taxes on income or consumption can achieve
desired welfare outcomes more efficiently
10What are the main tax options?
- Lump sum taxes No efficiency cost, but
generally inequitable - Income taxes
- General, linear or non-linear ? taxes savings
twice! - Non-linear differential
- Consumption taxes
- General expenditure tax, linear or non-linear
- Uniform value added tax
- Uniform retail tax
- Differential commodity taxes (by VAT or retail)
11What is the best overall system of taxes?
- Both income and commodity taxes have
disadvantages and combining them may be
beneficial - Optimal tax models that attempt to determine the
optimal combination are complex. However, some
general principles emerge
12What are the main principles of taxation?
- Tax revenue is raised most efficiently by taxing
factors or goods with inelastic supply or demand - In the absence of lump sum taxes, tax creates
excess burdens and a strict target-instrument
approach may be inefficient. The optimal policy
for any tax depends on the availability and
levels of other taxes
13What are the implications of these tax
principles?
- When sources of income and factors of production
are highly substitutable, there are efficiency
benefits in taxing all sources at the same rate - An income tax penalises savings. However, an
expenditure tax raises less revenue that an
income tax with the same nominal rate and is
generally more inequitable - Whether an income tax or an expenditure tax is
preferable depends very importantly on the size
of the distortions, but it is generally accepted
that income taxes are superior
14Should commodity taxes be included?
- Commodity taxation captures income that may
otherwise evade tax - It may provide a more efficient relief for
savings than a differential income tax system
that taxes income from savings at a lower rate - It may be considered fairer to tax what
individuals take out of the economic system
15If commodity taxes are included, what is the
optimal form?
- When demand elasticities are similar across
commodities, for any revenue target, a broad set
of low tax rates is preferable - However, when demand elasticities vary
significantly, differential tax rates, in inverse
relation to the price elasticity of demand,
reduce the excess burden
16How can an existing tax system be improved?
- In practice, if the derived optimal tax rules
were to be implemented it would be likely that a
major change of the fiscal structure would be
required - Many countries, including Australia, have opted
instead in favour of gradual policy reforms which
involve slowly phasing in some taxes and removing
others
17Recent reforms in Australia
- Introduction of FBT Sept 1985
- Introduction of CGT Sept 1985
- Full imputation for company tax July 1987
- Introduction of CGT discount, abolition of
indexation averaging Sept 1999 - Abolition of wholesales sales tax July 2000
- Introduction of GST July 2000
- Introduction of consolidation regime July 2002
18GST
- Major tax reform that took place in July 2002
- Why?
- The Wholesale Sales Tax (WST) introduced in the
1930s taxed a narrow range of goods, but did not
directly tax services (over two thirds of
Australias economic activity) - Personal tax rates believed to be too high and
complicated tax laws and loopholes allowed those
who could afford financial advice to avoid paying
their fair share
19Indeed, a bundle of reforms
- Reforms to the income tax and social security
- Reforms to the indirect tax and State finances
- Reform to business taxation
- Reform to tax administration
20Reform to the income tax and social security
- Why?
- Disincentive effects of high income tax rates
- Unfairness through tax minimisation
- Complexity (in particular, lack of integration
between the income tax and the social security
system) - How?
- Lower income tax rates
- Reform of family assistance
- Increase in social security payments
21Reforms to indirect tax and State finances
- Why?
- WST outdated
- Inefficient State excise duties and fiscal
imbalance - How?
- Abolishing inefficient indirect taxes
- Introducing a GST
- Giving all GST revenue to the States
- Reforming excise duties
22Reforms to business taxes
- Why?
- Business tax outdated
- Inconsistent entity treatment, inappropriate
taxation of company groups and inconsistent
treatment of distributions - Incoherent framework
- How?
- Reforming taxation of business entities
- Reforming taxation of business investments
- Review of business taxation
23Reforms to entities taxation
- Taxing trusts like companies
- Addressing tax minimisation
- Moving towards consolidation
- Achieving consistent treatment of company
distributions
24Reform to tax administration
- Why?
- High costs of dealing with many bodies of
administration - Inflexible and arbitrary business payment
- Inefficient and outdated withholding systems
- Complex tax laws
- Increasing size of underground economy
- How?
- Improving business registration system (through
ABN) - Introducing one tax instalment system for all tax
payers - Improving certainty and reliability of advice
- Simplifying tax returns and integrating the tax
code - Reducing tax avoidance
25Fiscal federalism
- What economic functions and tax powers should be
allocated to each level of government? - Is there an optimal multilevel system of
government? - What principles should govern inter-government
financial relations?
26What economic functions should be allocated to
each level?
- Government has three main functions
macroeconomic stabilisation, income distribution
and resource allocation when markets fail - Central government is best placed for
macroeconomic stabilisation and
redistribution/welfare policy - The major function of local government is the
provision of local public goods
27How should taxes be allocated to different levels
of government?
- Distributional concerns
- Allocative efficiency the allocation should
minimize DWL - Fiscal adequacy the allocation should provide
adequate funding for each level of government - Accountability the allocation should take into
account the preferences of citizens
28Vertical fiscal imbalancefiscal adequacy and
accountability
- The central government is the most efficient
taxer of the most important tax bases (income and
consumption) - This creates vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) -
one level of government raises more revenue that
it requires for its own purposes and another
level of government raises less than it needs - Central government is likely to overspend or
place conditions on grants that are inconsistent
with local preferences
29What are the equity issues in taxation with
multilevel government?
- Local taxes are often regressive - in order to
retain their tax base, local government must
attract and retain higher income households - Local government have unequal capacity to provide
public services. This is known as horizontal
fiscal imbalance (HFI), which arises because of - differences in the revenue raising capacity, and
- differences in expenditure needs
30Is there an optimal multilevel system of
government?
- Tiebout hypothesis a competitive system of local
governments could provide an efficient outcome
with no need for government intervention - However, Tiebout conditions do not fully apply in
Australia there are few states and household
movement between them is expensive
31Commonwealth-Staterelations
- Commonwealth provides national public goods and
social security benefits, plus grant financial
assistance to any State - The States are the main public providers of
services to the Community including law and
order, primary and secondary education, most
health services, and regional economic
infrastructure services - Local government provides several local services
(local roads, parks, libraries )
32Tax revenue by level of government 2001-02
State and local tax revenue 31.0
Commonwealth tax revenue 69.0
33Commonwealth government tax revenue 2003-04
Fringe benefits tax 1.8
Indirect taxes 16.2
Agricultural Levies and Other taxes 0.9
Income tax Superannuation 3.3
Income tax Companies and PRRT 21.6
Income tax individuals and other withholding 56.
2
34State and local government tax revenue 2001-02
Taxes on motor vehicles 6.4
Other 0.5
Insurance tax 4.2
Gambling tax 5.5
GST 40.6
Taxes on immovable property 14.1
Taxes on financial and capital transactions 14.4
Employers payroll tax 14..3
35What are the implications of this breakdown of
tax revenue?
- The Commonwealth raises much more revenue that it
spends on its own programs whereas State
governments raise less than they are required to
spend - The degree of VFI is large compared with other
federations
36How are the VFI and HFI tackled?
- In the 2002-03 budget, the Commonwealth
government forecasted that it would provide 54
billion to the states by way of
inter-governmental grants. Of this about 60 was
in untied grants and 40 in specific purpose
grants. About two thirds of tied grants are
directed to education and health - Inter-governmental cross-subsidies are large NSW
and Victoria are the main contributors to
revenue South Australia, Tasmania and Northern
Territory are the major beneficiaries
37Recent changes in the federal tax-arrangements
- The tax changes introduced in July 2000 had a
significant effect on federal-state tax
arrangements - Income from the GST replaced general purpose
grants (financial assistance grants) and
revenue from some taxes that the States gave up.
Like the financial assistance grants, the GST is
untied - The Commonwealth distributes GST revenue to the
states on the basis of horizontal fiscal
equalisation principles
38Other Commonwealth payments to state and local
governments
- The Commonwealth also provides general revenue
assistance in three main categories - Budget Balancing Assistance (BBA) grants
- National Competition Payments (NPCs)
- Special Revenue Assistance (SRA)
- Specific purpose payments are payments for policy
purposes that relate to particular functional
activities, such as health or education
39GST revenue provision and total Commonwealth
payments to state/local sector 2003-04 estimates
40Is the Australian federal system an efficient
multilevel system?
- The allocation of functions is broadly as would
be expected. However, there is much overlap of
responsibilities and duplication of services
(National Commission of Audit, 1996),
particularly in health and education - The Commonwealth controls the major tax bases
income and consumption. Note that although the
Commonwealth describes the GST as a state tax,
the Commonwealth decides how this revenue will be
allocated between the states
41What are the implications of this control of
major tax bases?
- A high degree of VFI which is not conducive to
accountability and efficiency in government - The states reliance on a mixed bag of taxes
(payroll taxes on medium and large firms, stamp
duties on the exchange of assets (mainly
property), motor vehicle taxes, taxes on
insurance and on gambling, taxes on the turnover
of financial institutions and land taxes) which
do not provide an efficient tax system
42Globalisation and fiscal competition
- In what ways does globalisation affect government
revenue and expenditure? - Globalisation may reduce government expenditures
- Increases the mobility of factors of production
- Modern technology facilitates the worldwide
movement of money and increases the possibility
of tax evasion - Tariff reductions reduce taxes on trade
43What is the evidence?
- Globalisation appears to have had little impact
in government revenue . However, - Tax revenue is the product of tax base and tax
rate(s) - Globalisation may affect the structure of taxes,
with low tax rates on mobile factors and high on
immobile factors - Tax revenues depend also on the demand for
government services
44How does globalisation affect taxes on production?
- The more mobile is the factor the more easily it
can escape taxation - The principal hypothesis of the tax competition
literature is that tax rates on mobile factors of
production (like capital) will fall and tax rates
on more immobile factors (like labour and land)
will rise
45Capital
- Two types of capital financial (portfolio) and
real or FDI, where portfolio capital is more
mobile than FDI - In theory, interest on portfolio capital is
liable to personal income tax because governments
can tax their own residents on their worldwide
income. However, cross-border investments often
evade tax - Income generated by FDI is taxed through company
income tax. Tax competition might be expected to
reduce corporate rates and to create convergence
of rates
46What is the evidence?
- The average rate of corporate income tax in the
25 OECD countries fell from 43.5 in 1986 to
33.2 in 1998. In Australia, government reduced
the corporate tax rate from 39 in 1988 to 30 in
2001-02 - Tax rates converged range between the highest
and the lowest tax rate from 28 to 20, and the
standard deviation from 7 to 4.5
47Labour
- Labour is less mobile
- However, skilled high-income workers are usually
in international demand and can afford the
transaction costs of relocation - In the last 20 years, there has been a worldwide
decline in the progressivity of income tax
structures
48How does globalisation affect taxes on
consumption?
- Consumption activities are generally less mobile
- Accordingly, we would expect globalisation to
lead to an increase in consumption taxes and user
charges - OECD countries, including Australia, have
significantly increased consumption taxes,
notably by the use of VAT (or GST) - Shifts in the tax structure away from taxation of
capital and labour income to consumption affect
the burden of taxation
49How does tax competition affect economic
efficiency?
- When capital is immobile, there is no DWL due to
loss of capital - When capital is mobile across jurisdictions the
marginal social cost of taxation includes the
loss of output that arises when capital moves
abroad to escape the tax burden - However, this model assumes that income from
capital is taxed at its source rather than at its
destination
50Source vs destination principle
- When tax rates at sources differ, taxation of
income at source distorts the flow of capital and
investment decisions - If income is taxed according to the destination
(or residence) principle, a residents worldwide
capital income is taxed at the same rate,
regardless of its source. The worldwide
allocation of capital, and hence production
efficiency, is then independent of local tax
rates
51Is the Australian system destination or source
based?
- Under Australian legislation most income is taxed
under the destination (residence) principle ?
Law-abiding owners of capital have no tax
incentive to move capital overseas - The Australian government also taxes income from
Australian sources that accrues to foreigners ? A
source based element that may discourage foreign
capital and distort the worldwide allocation of
capital and productive efficiency
52New International Tax Arrangements Bill 2003
- Balancing residence and source taxation
Bilateral tax treaties, controlled foreign
company (CFC), foreign investment fund (FIF),
transferor trust, transfer-pricing, thin
capitalisation - Taxing inbound investment source taxation of
capital income - Taxing outbound investment residence taxation of
capital income - Taxing conduit income
53References and further reading
- Stiglitz, J.E. (2000) Economics of the Public
Sector, 3rd edition, W. W. Norton - Abelson, P. (2003) Public Economics principles
and practice, Applied Economics, Sydney
54Tax policy papers
- Tax reform Not a new tax, a new tax system
- GST legislation
- Commonwealth-State funding
- Review of Business Taxation
- New Business Tax System
- Entity Taxation and Consolidation
- Review of International Tax Arrangements
- New International Tax Arrangements Bill 2003