Two Kinds of Reasoning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Two Kinds of Reasoning

Description:

Dave Letterman is an entertainer. Therefore David Letterman is an extrovert. ... but they do not attempt to show that the conclusion necessarily follows from the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: tonya9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Two Kinds of Reasoning


1
Two Kinds of Reasoning
  • Chapter 2

2
Arguments General Features
  • Review What is an argument?
  • God exists.
  • This is a statement, not an argument.
  • God exists. It is as plain as the nose on your
    face.
  • This is a more emphatic statement, but it is
    still not an argument.
  • God exists. There are no atheists in foxholes.
  • From a logical standpoint, these two statements
    are not related.

3
Arguments General Features
  • I think God exists, because I was raised a
    Baptist.
  • This is not an argument, rather it is an
    explanation about why someone believes in God.
  • God exists because something had to cause the
    universe.
  • This is an argument because it has a premise that
    supports a conclusion.

4
Unstated Premises and Conclusions
  • Of course tennis players arent weak, in fact,
    no athletes are weak. This argument is missing a
    premise.
  • All true democrats believe in freedom of speech,
    but there are some Americans who would impose
    censorship on free expression. This argument is
    missing a conclusion.
  • We will talk about this much more in chapter 8.

5
Deductive arguments
  • We talked about deductive arguments in the last
    chapter. However, there are more things to know
    about deductive arguments.
  • Validity if it isnt possible for the
    premise(s) to be true and the conclusion to be
    false.
  • When the premise(s) of an argument are true and
    the argument is valid, then it is a sound
    argument.
  • We will talk about this much more in chapter 8,
    too.

6
Inductive arguments
  • The premises of inductive arguments dont prove
    their conclusions they support them.
  • For example
  • The vast majority of entertainers are
    extroverts. Dave Letterman is an entertainer.
    Therefore David Letterman is an extrovert.
    Inductive argument. The premises support the
    conclusion, but they do not attempt to show that
    the conclusion necessarily follows from the
    premises.

7
Exercises 2-5.
  • (A few exercises from 2-5, page 57-58 of the
    text)
  • Which of these items are intended to be deductive
    demonstrations and which are intended to provide
    inductive support?
  • 1. No mayten trees are deciduous, and all
    nondeciduous trees are evergreens. It follows
    that all mayten trees are evergreens.
  • 2. Mike must belong to the Bartenders and
    Beverage Union Local 165, since almost ever Las
    Vegas bartender does.
  • 3. Ive never met a golden retriever with a
    nasty disposition. I bet there arent any.
  • Please turn to page 56 of your textbook.
    Identify the premises and conclusion in the first
    5 exercises in exercise section 2-3.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com