36h WRF Precip Forecast - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

36h WRF Precip Forecast

Description:

36h WRF Precip Forecast – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: kcon8
Category:
Tags: 36h | wrf | forecast | pog | precip

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 36h WRF Precip Forecast


1
Weather Research and Forecasting Model
Goals Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and
assimilation system, and accelerate research
advances into operations
36h WRF Precip Forecast
  • Collaborative partnership, principally among
    NCAR, NOAA, DoD,
  • OU/CAPS, FAA, and university community
  • WRF governance through multi-agency Oversight
    and Science
  • Boards development conducted by 15 WRF
    Working Groups
  • Software framework provides portable, scalable
    code with
  • plug-compatible modules
  • Ongoing active testing and rapidly growing
    community use
  • Over 1,200 registered community users, annual
  • workshops and tutorials for research
    community
  • Daily experimental real-time forecasting at
    NCAR ,
  • NSSL, FSL, AFWA, U. of Illinois
  • Operational implementation at NCEP and AFWA in
    FY04

Analyzed Precip
27 Sept. 2002
2
WRF Software Design
  • Performance-Portable
  • Scaling on foreseeable parallel platforms
  • Architecture independence
  • No specification of external packages
  • Run-Time Configurable
  • Domain size, nest configurations, parallelism
  • Physics, numerics, data, and I/O options
  • Maintainability Extensibility
  • Single source code
  • Modular, hierarchical design, coding standards
  • Plug compatible physics, dynamical cores
  • Registry to describe and manage data and I/O

3
Software Architecture
Driver
Driver Layer
Config Inquiry
I/O API
Mediation Layer
DM comm
Package Independent
Solve
OMP
Config Module
WRF Tile-callable Subroutines
Data formats, Parallel I/O
Package Dependent
Message Passing
Model Layer
Threads
External Packages
  • Driver I/O, communication, multi-nests, state
    data
  • Model routines computational, tile-callable,
    thread-safe
  • Mediation layer interface between model and
    driver
  • Interfaces to external packagese

4
WRF Multi-Layer Domain Decomposition
  • Single version of code enabled for efficient
    execution on
  • Shared-memory multiprocessors
  • Distributed-memory multiprocessors
  • Distributed clusters of SMPs
  • Vector and scalar processors
  • Model domains are decomposed for parallelism on
    two-levels
  • Patch section of model domain allocated to a
    distributed memory node
  • Tile section of a patch allocated to a
    shared-memory processor within a node
  • Distributed memory parallelism is over patches
    shared memory parallelism is over tiles within
    patches

5
Scaling Performance
6
Benefit of Higher Order Model Numerics
7
Eulerian Nonhydrostatic Model Solvers
  • Full conservation of variables in flux form
  • Prognostic equations for conserved quantities
  • Pressure and temperature diagnosed from
  • thermodynamics
  • High order numerics
  • Two level, 3rd order Runge-Kutta split-explicit
    time
  • integration
  • 2nd- 6th order centered or upwind advection
  • Alternative vertical coordinates
  • Terrain-following height coordinate
  • Terrain-following mass coordinate

8
WRF Model Applications
  • Basic research
  • Idealized simulations
  • Atmospheric process studies
  • Other geophysical fluid dynamical applications
  • Numerical weather research and prediction
  • Regional NWP
  • Storm-scale forecasting
  • Hurricane forecasting (ocean coupling)
  • Global weather modeling
  • Applied meteorological applications
  • Air quality studies (chemistry coupling)
  • Fire weather research (combustion coupling)
  • Regional climate studies

9
Gravity Current Simulations
10
2-D Mountain Wave Simulation
11
2D Squall Lines
12
Supercell Thunderstorm Simulation
Surface temperature, surface winds and cloud
field at 2 hours
(dx 2 km, dz 500 m, dt 12 s, 80 x 80 x 20
km domain )
13
WRF Real-Time Forecasting
NCAR 10 and 22 km Continental US,
4 km Central US (BAMEX) NCEP
8 km Mass and NMM,
West, Central, and Eastern US NSSL
12 km Continental US
3 km Regional FSL 10 km
Northeastern US AFWA 15 km
Continental US U. Of Illinois 25 km,
Midwestern US (http//WRF-model.org
)
14
36 h Forecast Valid 12Z 27 Sept 02 24 h
Precipitation Verification
(mm)
15
3-6 h Accumulated Precip Forecasts Valid 18Z 4
June 2002
(From Mike Baldwin and Matt Wandishin, NOAA/NSSL)
16
3-6 h Accumulated Precip Forecasts Valid 18Z 4
June 2002
(From Mike Baldwin and Matt Wandishin, NOAA/NSSL)
17
Power Spectra for 3 h Precipitation
12Z forecasts, 15-18 Z accum precip, valid 4 June
2002
(From Mike Baldwin and Matt Wandishin, NOAA/NSSL)
18
Model Physics in High Resolution NWP
19
Convection Resolving NWP using WRF
Questions to address
  • Is there any increased skill in
    convection-resolving forecasts, measured
    objectively or subjectively?
  • Is there increased value in these forecasts?
  • What can we expect given that the small spatial
    and temporal scales we are now resolving are
    inherently unpredictable at forecast times of
    O(day)?
  • If the forecasts are more valuable, are they
    worth the cost?

20
Realtime 4 km BAMEX Forecast
24-25 May 2003
Radar reflectivity 00Z 24 May initialization 36
h forecast
21
Reflectivity, 12 Z 24 May 2003
Observed
WRF 12 h 4 km forecast
22
Reflectivity, 06 Z 25 May 2003
Observed
WRF 30 h 4 km forecast
23
Realtime 4 km BAMEX Forecasts Valid 6/8/03 12Z
Composite NEXRAD Radar
4 km BAMEX forecast 36 h Reflectivity
4 km BAMEX forecast 12 h Reflectivity
24
Realtime 4 km BAMEX Forecasts Valid 6/10/03 12Z
Composite NEXRAD Radar
4 km BAMEX forecast 36 h Reflectivity
4 km BAMEX forecast 12 h Reflectivity
25
Realtime 4 km BAMEX Forecasts Valid 6/10/03 12Z
Composite NEXRAD Radar
10 km BAMEX forecast 36 h Reflectivity
10 km BAMEX forecast 12 h Reflectivity
26
Realtime 4 km BAMEX Forecasts Valid 6/10/03 12Z
Composite NEXRAD Radar
22 km CONUS forecast 36 h Reflectivity
22 km CONUS forecast 12 h Reflectivity
27
Problems with Traditional Verification Schemes
forecast 1
forecast 2
truth
Issue the obviously poorer forecast has better
skill scores From Mike Baldwin NOAA/NSSL
28
Ensemble Forecasting
  • Advantages
  • Ensemble mean is generally superior
  • Ensembles provide
  • a measure of expected skill or confidence
  • a quantitative basis for probabilistic
    forecasting
  • a rational framework for forecast verification
  • information for targeted observations
  • Limitations/Challenges
  • Not clear how to optimally specify the initial
    conditions (singular vectors, breeding,
    perturbed observations)
  • Requires more computer resources

29
Coupled Systems
(Source Rick Allard, NRL)
30
Model Coupling
  • Adapting WRF framework for model coupling
  • Extension of WRF I/O API specification
  • Use of Model Coupling Environment Library, and
    Model Coupling Toolkit
  • Applications
  • Atmosphere/ocean coupling (Hurricane-WRF)
  • Atmosphere/chemistry coupling
  • (WRF-Chem)

31
WRF-Chem Based on EPA CMAQ Model
  • Development of a WRF-Chem model based on EPAs
    Community Multiscale/Multipollutant Air Quality
    (CMAQ) model to meet both on-line and off-line
    modeling needs (Institute for Multidimensional
    Air Quality Studies, U. Houston).
  • Intended use of coupled air-quality model
  • - forecasting chemical-weather,
  • - testing air pollution abatement strategies,
  • - planning and forecasting for field campaigns,
  • - analyzing measurements from field campaigns
  • - assimilation of satellite and in-situ chemical
    measurements

(Daewon W. Byun and Seung-Bum Kim, University of
Houston)
32
Simulated Surface O3 and Horizontal Wind
2130 UTC August 27, 2000
Ozone
Surface Winds
High ozone plumes are located in the downwind
side of high emission sources in the urban and
industrial complexes due to steady southeasterly
sea breeze winds
(Daewon W. Byun and Seung-Bum Kim, University of
Houston)
33
Comparison with NOAA Aircraft Obs.
Model shows higher background ozone plume
locations are well matched with observations.
(Daewon W. Byun and Seung-Bum Kim, University of
Houston)
34
Online WRF-Chem Implementation (FSL)
  • Consistent all transport done by meteorology
  • Same vertical and horizontal coordinates (no
    horizontal and vertical interpolation)
  • Same physics parameterization for subgrid scale
    transport
  • No interpolation in time, or flow/mass
    adjustments
  • Chemistry Weather interactions / feedbacks
  • Radiation, microphysics, etc
  • Easy handling (Data management)
  • Meteorology and chemistry data in same history
    file
  • Often more efficient (CPU costs)

35

Model Forecasts
  • Surface O3 forecast
  • Similar results!
  • Wind direction
  • Front location
  • Peak O3
  • Other AQ models are similar
  • Figure Stu McKeen
  • (NOAA/AL)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com