MANJUL BAJPAI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

MANJUL BAJPAI

Description:

... f f f fffeeeeendnfnfnfnenenenenennnnnnnnnnn n n n n n n nnnnnnnanG f f f e e e e S S S ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: osbaj
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MANJUL BAJPAI


1
EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM
AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA
  • MANJUL BAJPAI
  • GOA - 29.03.2008

2
1990 -1996
  • Telegraph Act, 1885 - DoTs monopoly - No
    competition, so no Regulator or Adjudicator
  • Privatisation (1990s) NTP-94 - competition
    introduced - Independent Regulator required
  • TRAI proposed as a non-statutory body
  • Standing Committee recommended statutory status
    to ensure independence and effectiveness.
  • Supreme Court emphasized TRAIs independence
  • TRAI Act, 1997 enacted

3
January 1997-June 1999
  • TRAI had limited adjudicatory powers - Service
    Providers inter se or between Service Providers
    and Group of Consumers - on -Interconnection-
    Revenue Sharing - Quality of Service - Consumer
    Interest
  • Service Provider defined as meaning the
    Government including a Licencee
  • TRAI exercised adjudicatory powers qua DoT in
    latters capacity as Licensor
  • DoT challenged TRAIs powers contending that DoT
    as Licensor cannot be equated to a Service
    Provider
  • High Court held that TRAI had no such powers qua
    DoT in latters capacity as Licensor
  • Two years of Litigation - Mostly License issues -
    virtual Vacuum

4
June 1999 - January 2000
  • No separate dispute settlement Forum was
    available to entertain disputes between Licensor
    and Licensees
  • NTP-99 TRAI to act as Arbitrator for settling
    disputes between Licensor and Licensee.
  • Government issued notification to implement this
    policy.
  • TRAI never acted as Arbitrator
  • Government withdrew this Notification

5
Post January 2000
  • TRAI Act was amended in January 2000
  • TDSAT was established
  • Significant changes over earlier law
  • Separation of Regulatory and Adjudicatory
    functions
  • Vested with both Original and Appellate
    jurisdictions
  • Can adjudicate upon any dispute
  • Empowered to adjudicate disputes between
    Licensor
  • and Licensee
  • Appeals now lie directly to Supreme Court
  • It also empowered the Government extend the TRAI
    Act to Cable and Broadcasting Sectors.
  • In January 2004, TDSAT was empowered to settle
    disputes in Cable and Broadcasting sectors also.

6
THE WAY AHEAD
  • TDSAT - a success story
  • Fastest and maximum disposals
  • Telecom Law is a specialized field
  • Government must ensure that the knowledge and
    expertise gained during litigation must be passed
    on to the succeeding Chairperson and Members.
    This can be done one - by making timely
    appointments and two by ensuring overlap
    between the outgoing persons and incoming
    persons.

7
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com