Full Cost Capitalize as Assets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Full Cost Capitalize as Assets

Description:

G&A allocated to acquisition, exploration, or development. Compare FC to SE ... undeveloped reserves exist, estimate future development costs (at current prices) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: TCR1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Full Cost Capitalize as Assets


1
Full Cost Capitalize as Assets
  • Property Acquisition
  • Exploration
  • Development
  • GG
  • Delay rentals
  • GA allocated to acquisition, exploration, or
    development

2
Compare FC to SE
  • Most costs are treated the same
  • FC capitalizes and SE expenses
  • GG costs
  • Exploratory dry holes
  • Delay rentals
  • Cost center - for FC costs center is the country,
    including offshore area under the countrys
    jurisdiction

3
Additional Anomalies for FC
  • Impairment expenses are capitalized for FC
  • Abandonments continue as capitalized costs for FC
  • GA allocable to acquisition, exploration, or
    development is capitalized

4
Cost Center - Accounts
  • While a country is a single cost center, the
    books and records of the company may be similar
    in detail as a SE company
  • Example, management will want costs and revenues
    by lease, well, field, etc.
  • IRS will want information by property unit for
    percentage depletion computation.

5
Acquisition Costs
  • Similar to a SE company, acquisition costs will
    be charged to unproved property
  • Drilling costs are initially charged to wells in
    progress
  • If the well is successful, the costs are
    transferred to wells and related equipment and
    facilities
  • Unsuccessful wells are transferred to dry hole
    costs -- an asset account for FC companies

6
DDA for FC Companies
  • Use all costs for the cost center and one of the
    two following methods
  • Allowable Methods
  • Unit of production same as for SE
  • Unit of revenue
  • Capitalized costs at year end/ X Production at
  • Proved reserves BOY valued actual selling
  • at year end prices price

7
Example Problem 7-3
  • Common unit of measure basis
  •  
  • Oil Gas BOE
  • Proved reserves EOY 100,000 300,000 150,000
  • Production during year 20,000 50,00 28,333
  • Proved reserves BOY 120,000 350,000 178,333
  • 940,000 X 28,333 149,344
  • 150,000 28,333

8
Problem 7-3 (Contd)
  • Revenue basis
  •  
  • Production Proved Reserves
  • Oil 20,000 X 60 1,200,000 100,000 X 70
    7,000,000
  • Gas 50,000 X 5 250,000 300,000 X
    7.50 2,250,000
  • 1,450,000 9,250,000
  •  
  • 940,000 X 1,450,000 .
    127,383
  • 9,250,000 1,450,000

9
DDA for FC
  • Amortize costs over proved reserves (developed
    and undeveloped)
  • Costs include
  • Proved property costs
  • Lease well equipment and IDC
  • If some proved undeveloped reserves exist,
    estimate future development costs (at current
    prices)
  • Also, estimate future dismantlement and
    abandonment costs (net of salvage).
  • May also include unproved property costs

10
Exclusion of Costs - FC
  • DDA is based on proved reserves (both developed
    and undeveloped)
  • Costs associated with acquisition and evaluation
    of unproved property may be excluded from the
    DDA base.
  • However, exploratory dry holes on unproved
    properties must be added to the amortization base.

11
Exclusion of Costs - FC
  • All costs for unproved properties may be excluded
    except for
  • dry holes
  • impairment costs
  • abandonment costs
  • costs if proved
  • any GG not related to specific properties
  • All costs for proved properties must be included
    except for major development projects where
    reserves have not yet been determined
  • Future dismantlement costs, net of salvage, must
    be included
  • Future development costs must be included

12
Example Page 240
  • Proved property costs 40,000
  • Unproved property costs 70,000
  • Nondrilling exploration proved 80,000
  • Nondrilling exploration Unproved 100,000
  • Drilling cost Proved 400,000
  • Wells in progress Unproved 600,000
  • Dry holes Unproved 900,000
  • Total accumulated DDA (490,000)
  • Net capitalized 1,700,000
  • Future development costs 300,000
  • Future decommissioning costs 400,000

13
Example Page 240 (Contd)
  • Net capitalized 1,700,000
  • Future development costs 300,000
  • Future decommissioning costs 400,000
  • Net costs to amortize 2,400,000
  • Compute DDA
  • 2,400,000 X 100,000 bbls 400,000
  • 500,000 bbls 100,000 bbls

14
Example Page 240 (Contd)
  • What if Tyler Company elects to exclude all
    possible costs?
  • Net costs 2,400,000
  • Less excludable costs
  • Unproved property costs (70,000)
  • Nondrilling exploration Unproved (100,000)
  • Wells in progress Unproved (600,000)
  • Amortizable costs 1,630,000
  • Compute DDA
  • 1,630,000 X 100,000 bbls 271,667
  • 500,000 bbls 100,000 bbls
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com