PercentileSFO Comparison Charts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

PercentileSFO Comparison Charts

Description:

Created so schools could compare their performance to 'similar schools' ... For each school, compare results to performance of 19 nearest schools (in terms ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: meganp8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PercentileSFO Comparison Charts


1
Percentile/SFO Comparison Charts
  • Data and Evaluation Division
  • Feb 2008

2
Purpose of presentation
  • To explain to schools the replacement for the
    Like School Group approach, the Percentile/SFO
    Comparison Charts.

3
Topics
  • The Problem
  • The Previous Solution (LSGs)
  • Alternatives Considered
  • Percentile/SFO Comparison Charts

4
The Problem
  • How does my schools student achievement score
    compare to other schools, given that my school is
    different to the average school?

5
The Previous Solution - LSGs
  • Like school groups (LSG) commenced in 1996
  • Created so schools could compare their
    performance to similar schools
  • 9 LSGs based on two measures
  • EMA/Youth Allowance proportion of students in
    school in receipt of EMA or Youth Allowance
  • LBOTE proportion of students from a language
    background other than English

6
LSG chart
  • Good acceptance overall, but weaknesses are now
    apparent
  • Weaknesses include
  • Schools close to a boundary (unfairly compared
    to all schools in LSG)
  • EMA/Youth Allowance data no longer available
  • LSGs are of unequal size (no. of schools in LSG4
    is almost 10x that in LSG3)

7
Alternatives considered
  • 1) Like School Sphere
  • For each school, compare results to performance
    of 19 nearest schools (in terms of SFO and maybe
    LBOTE, enrolment)
  • Gets extremely complicated statistically
  • 2) Percentile/SFO Comparison Charts

8
Student Family Occupation (SFO) densities
  • Indicator of socio-economic status
  • SFO accounts for 38 of variance in student
    achievement
  • LBOTE only accounts for an additional 5
  • Used in Student Resource Package
  • 4 years of SFO data (2004-2007)

9
Student Family Occupation (SFO) densities how
calculated (extract from SRP Guide)
10
(No Transcript)
11
2005 SFOs for primary pri/sec schoolssorted
from highest to lowest socio-economic status (SES)
Lowest SES
22nd percentile
Highest SES
Highest SES
12
Nameless Primary School
13
2005 AIM Year 3 Reading mean scoressorted from
lowest to highest score
Lowest scoring school
Highest scoring school
14
Nameless Primary School
If socio-economic status, as measured by SFO, was
the sole determinant of student achievement,
youd expect the schools achievement percentile
to be in the same vicinity as the SFO percentile.
20 of schools have a lower AIM score
15
2005 SFOs for primary pri/sec schools sorted
from highest to lowest socio-economic status (SES)
Lowest SES
Highest SES
Highest SES
16
Nameless Primary School
The (up to) 20 of schools that are most like
this school in terms of SFO.
17
Nameless Primary School
18
Literacy
19
Literacy
20
Numeracy
21
Student Absence
22
Staff Opinion Survey
Parent Opinion Survey
Student (Attitudes to School) Survey
23
Value-add? No
  • Not an attempt at value-add
  • Simply is what it is
  • If SFO was the sole determinant of student
    achievement, a schools student achievement
    percentile would be within the vicinity of its
    SFO percentile. If its above (or below), the
    school could hypothesise why.

24
Percentile/SFO Comparison Charts Principles
behind
  • Use Student Family Occupation (SFO) only as best
    predictor of student achievement
  • Examine student achievement and SFO percentiles
    together
  • Keep it simple
  • Use lots of data, over time, across strands
    (dont rely on any one bit of data)
  • Combine the data with the school context to get
    the full story
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com