Title: Quantifying the impact and reversibility of exotic plant species in succession
1Quantifying the impact and reversibility of
exotic plant species in succession
- D.A. Peltzer 1, P.J. Bellingham 1, L.R. Walker 2
and P.A. Williams 1 - 1 Landcare Research, New Zealand
- 2 University of Nevada, Las Vegas NV, USA
2General questions about invasions
- Which species will naturalise?
- 2) Which species will become invasive?
- 3) What impacts are invaders having?
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5Nativeplants
Introducedplants
- 25,000 species
- 2,100 naturalised
- 250 weeds
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8Concerns about invasive species stem from
understanding and mitigating their negative
economic and biological effects (e.g., Cronk and
Fuller 1995, Vitousek et al. 1996, Pimental et
al. 2000, Mack et al. 2000, Levine et al. 2003).
9Outline for this talk
- Case studies of weed impacts on diversity,
nutrients and succession in NZ - Buddleja vs Coriaria
- Pinus vs Nothofagus
- Ulex vs Kunzea
- A framework for reversibility of impacts
10Buddleja vs Coriaria
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20Pinus vs. Nothofagus
21Pinus vs. Nothofagus
- Pinus contorta rapidly invades areas previously
dominated by native Nothofagus forest - What are the relative impacts of pines vs. beech
on resources and succession?
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Nothofagus
r20.58
25- Pinus contorta grows more rapidly and matures
earlier than Nothofagus - Nothofagus can regenerate under Pinus
- Pinus increases soil N and P relative to
Nothofagus
26Ulex vs Kunzea shrub successions
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Williams et al. unpublished
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34Ulex vs Kunzea
- Native woody plant richness was about one-third
higher under Kunzea - Successional trajectories are different under
Ulex and Kunzea
35Successions under exotic species
- Native woody species can regenerate under
Buddleja, Pinus and Ulex canopies. - Successions under exotics may differ from those
under natives (e.g. Kunzea, Coriaria) - How can we assess or mitigate negative impacts?
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Removal experiments
- Can quantify ecosystem impacts of individual
species - Can be used to determine the outcome of
interspecific interactions - Are the primary technique used in restoration and
by conservation managers
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43Removals applied to invaders
- Borrow techniques from field competition studies
- Anything short of extirpation creates a density
gradient which can be used to quantify the
impacts of invaders - Need to have appropriate controls
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50Reversibility functions
- Likely non-linear functions
- Quantify using removals with appropriate controls
(both intact and invaded) - Determine the impacts of exotics on resources,
community structure etc.
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57Which impacts are reversible?
- Reversible shading, pollinators
- Perhaps reversible alteration of soil nutrient
(N, P) levels, community composition - Not reversible extirpations, feedback switches
58Summary
- Exotic plants dominate many successions in New
Zealand and elsewhere - Comparisons with native successions can reveal
long-term impacts of these invaders - Removal experiments with appropriate controls can
be used to generate reversibility functions
59(No Transcript)