Do mentoring programs influence participants longerterm career development A case study PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Do mentoring programs influence participants longerterm career development A case study


1
Do mentoring programs influence participants
longer-term career development? A case study
  • Dr Coralie McCormack
  • University of Canberra

2
Case Study Womens Group Mentoring Program at UC
  • Aims to
  • foster the development of knowledge and skills,
    greater professional autonomy and confidence
  • develop professional networks within and between
    general and academic staff across the University
  • provide women with career development
    opportunities to facilitate advancement

3
Group mentoring model
  • 8-10 women
  • Academic general staff
  • University-wide
  • Individuals develop implement a
    personal/professional development plan

4
Groups are co-facilitated
  • One academic one general staff woman
  • Not discipline experts
  • Help participants identify their goals
  • Help structure activities to achieve goals
  • Ensure effective group processes

5
Program structure
  • One year program
  • Begins with one day on-campus workshop followed
    by 2 day off-campus residential retreat
  • Groups meet fortnightly-3 hours
  • Mid-year workshop
  • End-of-program presentation celebration

6
Interviewees
  • 2000-2003 program participants
  • 14 interviewees (26)
  • 11 general staff, 3 academic women
  • 11 employed at UC, 3 elsewhere in Canberra

7
Method
  • In-depth interviews, 45 mins
  • Two questions
  • Tell me about your experience as a participant in
    the Womens Group Mentoring Program at the
    University of Canberra?
  • Tell me about your career since completing the
    Womens Group Mentoring Program at the University
    of Canberra?

8
End-of-program career outcomes
  • Promotion during program (5)
  • Completion of tertiary teaching qualification (2)
  • Commencement of PhD (1)
  • Movement to new area of university(1)

9
End-of-program psychosocial outcomes
  • A feeling of connection e.g. increased
    understanding of university motivation for job
    for university as a workplace, reduced
    isolation, networks
  • A feeling of growing oneself e.g. increased
    self-confidence, self-understanding, gaining
    knowledge skills, affirmation of self-worth

10
On-going career development
  • Foundation on which to build extend workplace
    knowledge, skills networks
  • Catalyst for action in workplace in relation to
    on-going career development

11
Build on a foundation
  • Knowledge skills
  • Built into everyday work tasks
  • Apply for new positions interview preparation
  • Collegial networks
  • Facilitated everyday work tasks and transitions
    to new workplaces
  • Supported close rewarding friendships, job
    applications interview preparation, on-going
    study

12
Catalyst for action
  • Increased self-confidence
  • Step out of comfort zone
  • Take up opportunities rather than let them pass
    by
  • Stand up speak out in meetings
  • Say yes or no
  • Support other women
  • Recognise work/life imbalance act to rebalance

13
Limitations
  • No ready-made evaluation models
  • Outcomes not easy to identify measure
  • Difficult to determine if outcomes attributable
    to program or other factors
  • Particular mentoring model, in a small regional
    university
  • Small sample size

14
Conclusion
  • Developers of mentoring programs are being asked
    to plan more carefully, reflect more critically
    justify expenditure.
  • However, womens mentoring programs are not
    often considered to be the core business of
    anyone (De Vries, 2005 41).
  • If the longer-term benefits reported here are
    also the outcomes of mentoring programs in other
    contexts program developers will be in a better
    position to argue that mentoring programs become
    part of the core business of universities.

15
Recommendations
  • Continue to track during-program outcomes
  • Track participants ( non-participants) beyond
    the life of the program
  • Conduct detailed mapping of end-of-program and
    on-going outcomes, particularly networks
    confidence
  • Do this across
  • Program purposes
  • Contexts
  • Models of mentoring

16
References
  • West, D McCormack, C (2003) Womens Group
    Mentoring Programs Chit chat or effective
    professional development? in LJ Moxham, S
    Walker, T Dwyer, KM Douglas, and J Wooller (eds),
    Discovery Discovering Research, Discovering
    Education, Discovering Self, proceedings of the
    2003 Women in Research Conference, Central
    Queensland University, Rockhampton, 13-14
    November.
  • McCormack, C West, D (forthcoming 2006)
    Facilitated group mentoring develops key career
    competencies for university women a case study,
    Mentoring Tutoring Partnerships in Learning,
    vol 14, no 4.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com