Title: London, 26 April 2007Manooj Mistry
1The Potential of Exchange Traded Funds for
Pension Funds
- London, 26 April 2007 Manooj Mistry
2The Case for ETFs
Investment Products Group
3The old view Active vs Passive
- Active Management
- Pros
- Potential to beat the market - Alpha
- Possibility to reduce portfolio risk
- Cons
- Higher costs
- Low transparency
- Zero sum game
- Passive Management
- Pros
- Pure Beta exposure
- Low fees
- No manager risk
-
- Cons
- Bias to overvalued companies
- Only market exposure
4Active Management
- A zero sum game
- Performance of active managers is normally
distributed around the market return
Likelihood
Below the market
Better than the market
10 Market Performance
5Costs of active Management
6Importance of costs
- Costs reduce the returns
- After costs, the average active manager
underperforms the market
Likelihood
Below the market
Better than the market
8.8
10 Market Performance
Impact of costs
7Indexing vs. Active Investing
Source Lipper as of 30 March 2007 (in EUR)
8Active vs Passive Allocation
- How to maximise the opportunity/cost trade-off
A Optimist C Pessimist B Realist
- Source Roland RousseauAlpheta Rising,
Deutsche Bank Company Research, 2007.
9So what are the vehicles for indexing ?
- Swaps
- Futures
- Securitised Products certificates/notes/warrants
- Traditional Funds
- Exchange Traded Funds
10Why are ETFs ideal?
- Combine the best features of funds and listed
securities - Diversified
- Listed on exchanges with active market making
- Pricing Transparency
- Low costs
- Regulated (UCITS 3)
- They are NOT derivatives
- Large range of products available
11Shaping the future with ETFs
- Use ETFs as the building blocks of active
portfolios - Use skill of fund manger to create alpha
- Maximise asset allocation efficiency
- Reduce running costs of portfolio
- Reduce risk in portfolio
- Active Passive Investment Strategies
- Short term cash allocation
- Active asset allocation core satellite
- Strategic asset allocation
- Filling in the gaps
12Potential of the ETF market
Investment Products Group
13- Global ETF assets to exceed 1 trillion by 2010
- US has over 800 ETFs with over 450 billion AuM
(March 07) - Europe has over 350 ETFs with over 100 billion
AuM (March 07)
14Passive investing is becoming more popular
- Over 30 of the new AuM in the US went into
passive instruments of which close to 70 went
into ETFs
McKinsey / Institutional Investor U.S.
Institute Asset Management Benchmark Survey
15Pensions market is growing
- Globally pension funds hold 23.23 trillion USD
AuM, with a growth rate of 7.5 for the last 10
years assets
16Potential of the retail market in Europe
- Private investors are not yet active in ETFs
- In the US approx 50 of new AuM in 2006 came from
private investors - In Europe less than 15 of new AuM came from
private investors - ETF saving plans or fund of ETFs do not exist in
Europe - Continental Europe dominated by securitised
products such as certificates/warrant - Low cost/easy to issue
- Germany over 140,000 issued
- Estimated AUM of 300bn in Germany and
Switzerland - UCITS 3 allows for more structuring opportunities
which can be applied to the ETF market
17ETFs are getting even better
Investment Products Group
18ETF Product Evolution
Country Indices
Regional Benchmarks
Alternative indices
Market Cap
Structured eg reverse
ETF Product Menu
Global countries
Commodities
Sectors
Fixed Income
Global Benchmarks
Property
Style Value/Growth
Emerging Markets
Next evolution Semi Active / Active Indices ?
19More Style and Structured ETFs being launched
- Europe 131 ETFs launched in 2006 (78)
- 77 new ETFs launched in Q1 2007 (350 in total)
- 80 sector ETFs (37 launched in 2006)
- 40 style fundamental Indices
- 16 structured/managed ETFs
- US 153 new ETFs launched in 2006 (64)
- 131 new ETFs launched in Q1 2007 (439 in total)
- 57 of new ETFs launched in 2006 were on style
indices - 125 sector ETFs
- 180 style fundamental indices
- 50 structured or dynamic ETFs
20Innovations in index tracking within ETFs
- Emergence of swap based ETFs to deliver better
tracking performance - Inefficiencies in traditional index replication
strategies - Not ideal for large number of index constituents
- Not ideal for illiquid index constituents
- Most indices do not reflect the real world
- Real World factors can impact tracking error and
performance - Timing of dividend payments
- Tax treatment/timing of dividends
- Index turnover and transaction costs
- Swap based ETFs can reduce impact of real world
factors - Fund Performance Index Performance less fees
21Tracking Error Comparison Swap ETFs vs
Traditional ETFs
(Excludes enhancements possible through stock
lending to reduce impact of fees)
Index turnover
Tax treatment of dividends
Costs / Tracking Error
Timing of dividend payments
Total Expense Ratio
Traditional Index Tracking
Swap-based Index Tracking
22Tracking Performance (excluding enhancements)
Benchmark
Swap based ETF
Performance
Traditional ETF
Time
23Tracking Performance (including enhancements)
Enhancement may be achieved due lending fees
and better treatment of dividends paid by index
constituents
Swap based ETFs
Traditional ETFs
Benchmark
Performance
Time
24Conclusions
- Institutional investors will increasingly use
ETFs in their portfolios to increase efficiency
and maximise their alpha potential - European ETF market will continue to grow with
increased demand from institutions and retail
market - Variety and number of ETFs growing providing the
desired solution for investors - ETFs are becoming even better with lower tracking
errors
25Deutsche Bank Research
- ETF Special reports Weekly ETF reports
Quantitative Research
26Thank you
- db x-trackers
- Manooj Mistry Thorsten Michalik
- 44 207 545 1037 49 69 910 30 728
- manooj.mistry_at_db.com thorsten.michalik_at_db.com
- Website www.dbxtrackers.com
- Reuters DBETF
- Bloomberg DBETF ltGOgt
27Disclaimer
- Important information
- This presentation contains a short summary
description of the db x-trackers ETFs. A complete
description of al sub-funds are in the respective
and most recent prospectus of db x-trackers ETF.
This brochure is not for distribution to, or for
the attention of, US or Canadian persons. Without
limitation, this brochure does not constitute an
offer, an invitation to offer or a recommendation
to enter into any transaction. When making an
investment decision, you should rely solely on
the final documentation and any prospectus
relating to the transaction and not this summary.
Investment strategies involve numerous risks.
Prospective investors or counterparties should
understand and discuss with their professional
tax, legal, accounting and other advisor(s) the
effect of any transaction they may enter into. In
no way should Deutsche Bank be deemed to be
holding itself out as a fiduciary of the
recipient hereof. Deutsche Bank may make a market
or trade in instruments economically related to
fund units or derivatives mentioned herein, and /
or have investment banking or other relationships
with issuers of the relevant securities. Deutsche
Bank actively manages various risks, and on
occasion may deal in securities mentioned in this
document or in related instruments during the
period between your receipt of this brochure and
the award of any order. Whilst Deutsche Bank's
trading or hedging activities are not intended to
have any significant impact upon prices, our
dealings could affect the prices you pay or
receive for transactions in related securities or
fund units. Deutsche Bank, and its current and
future subsidiaries, parents, affiliates,
divisions, officers, directors, agents and/or
employees, disclaim all liability with respect to
this document and the information herein, and are
not liable for any errors or omissions, or for
any damages howsoever arising from any reliance
placed thereon, save as required by applicable
laws and regulations. - Index Disclaimer
- NEITHER STOXX LIMITED NOR DOW JONES COMPANY,
INC. HAS ANY RELATIONSHIP TO THE DB X-TRACKERS
SICAV (THE COMPANY), OTHER THAN THE LICENSING
OF THE DOW JONES EURO STOXX 50 INDEX AND THE
RELATED TRADEMARKS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH THE
DB X-TRACKERS DJ EURO STOXX 50 ETF (THE
SUB-FUND). DAX is a registered trademark of
Deutsche Börse AG. iNAV und XTF Exchange Traded
Funds are registered trademarks of Deutsche
Börse AG. The db x-trackers SMI ETF (the
Sub-Fund) is not in any way sponsored, ceded or
sold by the SWX Swiss Exchange and the SWX Swiss
Exchange makes no warranty or representation
whatsoever, express or implied, either as to the
results to be obtained from the use of the SMI
Index (the Index) and/or the level at which
such Index stands at any particular time on any
particular day. However, the SWX Swiss Exchange
shall not be liable (whether through negligence
or otherwise) to any person for any error in the
Index and SWX Swiss Exchange shall not be under
any obligation to disclose such errors. SP
and Standard Poors are registered
trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and
MIB is a trademark of the Borsa Italiana S.p.A.
These trademarks have been licensed for use by
Deutsche Bank AG. The db x-trackers SP/MIB
INDEX ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or
promoted by SP or Borsa Italiana and SP and
Borsa Italiana make no representation, warranty
or condition regarding the advisability of
investing in the db x-trackers SP/MIB INDEX ETF.
The funds or securities referred to herein are
not sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI, and
MSCI bears no liability with respect to any such
funds or securities or any index on which such
funds or securities are based. The Prospectus
for db x-trackers contains a more detailed
description of the limited relationship MSCI has
with Deutsche Bank, db x-trackers and any related
funds. - A full description of the terms and conditions of
all sub-fund are included in the prospectus of db
x-trackers. You can get the full and the
simplified prospectus of each sub-fund of db
x-trackers at your adviser at the Investment
FinanzCenter of Deutsche Bank or at Deutsche Bank
AG, TSS/Global Equity Services, Taunusanlage 12,
60325 Frankfurt am Main.