Mathematicians working with teachers in California: The ACCLAIM Experience PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 26
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mathematicians working with teachers in California: The ACCLAIM Experience


1
Mathematicians working with teachers in
California The ACCLAIM Experience
  • ???? Tom Roby
  • Math Dept. Q Center
  • University of Connecticut
  • (formerly of Cal State formerly Hayward)
  • Google Tom Roby

2
Outline
  • California idiosyncrasies
  • CA Prof. Development Institutes
  • ACCLAIM
  • Lesson Study Lightly
  • Questions Discussion (Feel free to ask or
    comment as we go.)

3
Math Education in California 1
  • California generates a new set of standards and
    Framework roughly every 7 years.
  • The 1992 Framework closely followed the NCTM
    standards, promoting a more constructivist
    approach.
  • The 1997 Standards/2000 Framework was largely
    written by Stanford mathematicians, and their
    adoption was controversial.
  • The new standards moved many topics 1-2 grades
    earlier in the curriculum, e.g., algebra in 8th
    grade.
  • This made it hard for teachers, some of whom were
    teaching unfamiliar topics.

4
Education in California 2
  • In 1998 Gray Davis elected governor, featuring
    education in campaign.
  • State created new tests to measure performance
    against the CA Standards California Standards
    Tests (CST).
  • Bonuses and penalties for teachers and schools
    were tied to test results.
  • Many teachers are uncomfortable with these
    high-stakes tests, which include an exit exam
    to receive a high school diploma.

5
California Professional Development Institutes
(CPDI)
  • Created by Governor Davis to improve teachers
    content and pedagogical knowledge in math and
    reading.
  • Involve faculty in math departments (not just in
    education schools).
  • Teachers get a stipend of 100/day to attend.
  • Institutes must be tied to the new CA state
    standards.

6
ACCLAIM Alameda County Collaborative for
Learning and Instruction in Mathematics
  • One of 30 CPDI sites around the state.
  • Three partners Cal State Hayward (CSUH), Alameda
    County Office of Education (ACOE), local
    districts.
  • Institutes designed and taught by team of
    mathematicians, classroom teachers, and education
    specialists.

7
ACCLAIM Alameda County Collaborative for
Learning and Instruction in Mathematics
8
ACCLAIM Alameda County Collaborative for
Learning and Instruction in Mathematics
9
ACCLAIM Alameda County Collaborative for
Learning and Instruction in Mathematics
10
ACCLAIM Statistics
11
ACCLAIM Structure (2000-03)
  • 9-15 day summer institutes meeting 8 hours/day
  • Focus on deeper understanding of math content and
    pedagogical strategies
  • One followup session per month on Saturdays
    during school year
  • Teachers given pre- and post-tests

12
ACCLAIM Fac./Staff
  • Phil Gonsalves, Associate Director
  • Drew Kravin (ACOE) co-Director
  • Content Leaders Maula Allen (MCS), Sue Benjamin
    (MCS), Ed Cruz (C4), Phil Duren (TEd), Karen
    Edwards (DVC), Sara Robinson (NYT), Eric Suess
    (Stat), Jean Simutis (MCS)
  • Admin Akiko, Keiko, Kristy, Laurie, TheGag
  • CSUH Andy, Art, Charlene, Erendira, Jan, Sue,
    CynthiaV (Foundation)

13
ACCLAIM Institutes
  • Primary Number Sense (Gr. K-3) 03-04
  • Elementary Number Sense (Gr. 4-6) 00-04
  • Elementary Geometry (Gr. 4-6) 01-03
  • Elementary Statistics (Gr. 4-7) 02
  • Transition to Algebra (Gr. 4-8) 02-04
  • Algebraic Thinking Institute (Gr. 8-12) 00-04
  • High School Algebra 2 (Gr. 9-12) 01-02
  • High School Geometry (Gr. 9-12) 01-04
  • Trigonometry (Gr. 9-12) 01-03
  • High School Prob. Stats (Gr. 8-12) 02

14
California 2004
  • Gray Davis is no longer governor.
  • CPDI are defunct as of 6/30/04.
  • CA Math Project (and CSMPs) are limping along.
  • Districts are under considerable fiscal and
    accountability pressure (NCLB).
  • One school in Hayward is now being SAITed (School
    Assistance and Intervention Team).

15
ACCLAIM Structure 2004
  • CSUH no longer receives funding directly ACOE
    negotiates with districts to provide training
    (fee for service).
  • Shorter institutes 5-8 days, 6 hrs/day
  • More emphasis on specific texts
  • District-specific institutes 4 Hayward, 3 Oak.
  • Only 4 institutes open to all. (2 were
    cancelled.)
  • More expensive 600 copay, 50/day stipend

16
Lesson Study (????) CCLP
  • ACCLAIM has tried a variety of models for
    teachers to work collaboratively on lesson
    planning.
  • In 2001-02 we devoted several afternoons to the
    basics of Japanese Lesson Study (Jugyoo
    Kenkyuu).
  • We found few teachers actually were able to put
    it into practice at their sites.
  • ACCLAIMs variation Collaborative Content-based
    Lesson Planning (? separate talk).

17
CCLP (Collaborative Content-based Lesson
Planning) ACCLAIMs version of Lesson Study
  • Teachers work together to plan and script lessons
    based on the new texts.
  • Because the curriculum is largely new, they need
    to plan all the lessons, not just a few.
  • They spend less time on each lesson, but still
    try to anticipate student responses, and still
    make time to visit other teachers' classrooms
    sometimes.
  • In later years, after the initial scripting is
    done, they can focus more attention on fewer
    lessons, as in the Japanese model.

18
Keys to ACCLAIMs Success
  • Experienced and knowledgeable staff
  • Close ties to schools and districts
  • Filled a gap in current Prof. Development
  • Created a community of teachers
  • Collaborators respect one anothers expertise
  • Adequate funding, including stipends for teacher
    participants

19
Assessment...
  • Once the rockets up
  • Statewide assessment by WestEd
  • Individual visits by UCOP staff
  • Pre- post-test results
  • Participants written and oral comments
  • Second order effectsNOT
  • Why NOT?

20
My Role as PI
  • Overall fiscal management
  • Hiring students and admin. staff
  • Working with other directors to plan institutes,
    hire Content Teacher Leaders, and respond to
    stimuli
  • Recruit other mathematicians and help them become
    involved in PD work

21
Rewards
  • Work directly affects more people than writing a
    research paper for 50 scholars
  • Clearly an area of great need
  • Teaching teachers feels multiplicative
  • Gain insight into both teaching and mathematics
    (e.g., PUFM)

22
Challenges
  • fiscal questions
  • disgruntled employees
  • difficult district leadership
  • union pay scale issues
  • rumors
  • apathetic participants
  • etc.
  • Limited infra-structure for large grant activity
    in my institution ? more work for the directors
  • The real world is messier than the ivory tower of
    mathematics

23
Role of Mathematicians
  • Help create and extend activities to insure deep
    level of math content
  • Guide discussions
  • Listen to teachers respect their expertise
  • Provide access to unusual resources, e.g.,
    Sloanes Sequence Site

24
Strategic Intensive Math Initiative (SIMI)
  • ACOE recently received a grant from the CA-MSP
    (Math Science Partnership) grant for 999K.
  • Model includes summer institutes to work with
    teachers in Hayward and Alameda, and school-year
    coaching.

25
Questions
  • Can ACCLAIM survive without grants?
  • Is it worth it?
  • What are the professional rewards?
  • How can I publish this?

26
Summary
  • More demanding content standards as well as NCLB
    requirements have required increased teacher
    professional development, e.g, ACCLAIM.
  • Mathematicians can play a useful role, but its
    not easy or simple.
  • Lesson Study is harder in practice then in
    theory.
  • How can we do better?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com