Title: Addressing Staff Retention Within Your Organization
1Addressing Staff RetentionWithin Your
Organization
- Jennifer Buher-Kane
- Senior Research Coordinator
- Out-of-School Time Resource Center
- University of Pennsylvania
2Two Central Issues
- How to address staff retention with your
organization - How to incorporate research on staff retention
into future grant proposals
3Overview
- Review current research
- Identify the causes and consequences
- Consider current national level efforts
- Address how this can inform your own work within
your OST organization
4The Future of Children, 1999
- 58 of the programs surveyed had experienced
turnover during the previous year, and those
programs reported that 60 of their staff had
changed40 of the staff had been with the
observed program for less than one year (Lowe
Vandell and Shumow, 1999).
5The Future of Children, 1999
- Jobs in after-school programs are primarily
part time and poorly paidFew front line staff
have academic preparation for work in the
after-school field, perceiving little financial
gain to seeking out relevant courses, lacking
time to do so, lacking interest (because they
will be in the field for only a few years),
and/or lacking confidence in their academic
skills (Halpern 1999).
6Factors Relating to Staff Turnover (Identified
through the MOST Initiative)
- Multiplies the stress on remaining staff
- Contributes to chaotic environment
- Lowers expectations for new hires
- Hiring staff with little educational preparation
- (Halpern 1999)
7Causes Identified Through the MOST Initiative
- Low Pay
- Higher wages are a key factor in reducing staff
turnover (Lowe Vandel and Shumow 1999). - Low expectations of staff to stay within the
field, making this a career - Few incentives to pursue higher education
- Turnover appears to result from the lack of
adequate compensation and options for upward
mobility within the field (NIOST 2003).
8Similar Findings in Formal Education (Ingersoll
2004)
- Causes
- Low pay, few resources, low levels of
administrative support, poor student discipline,
limited input in decision-making, not enough
preparation time - Consequences
- Forces lowering of expectations/standards for new
hires - Affects student outcomes
- Particularly detrimental within disadvantaged
areas
9Current National and Local-Level Efforts to
Address Staff Retention
10TASCs Staff Retention Model (2001)
- Three pronged strategy
- Hire people with a built-in connection to the
school community, such as parents - Interview them to determine in which areas they
have substantive expertise - Train those individuals to design and teach a
project to children designed around their area of
expertise
11AEDs BEST Initiative (2002)
- Through the BEST initiative, AED has identified
the following - Building organizational capacity to support youth
workers helps improve retention among youth
workers - Professional development is critical
- Strong networks of information sharing are key
supports - Youth workers must have organizational support
and a commitment for youth development
12PA Pathways
- The TEACH scholarship program is available in
Pennsylvania, and offers increased compensation
for training completed. Other scholarships (via
the refund voucher program) are available for
providers to pay for college level or
CDA training. And The Keystone Stars initiative
provides an increase in revenue for higher
quality centers, which can indirectly provide
funding for increasing staff compensation.
13NIOST ProjectBuilding a Skilled and Stable
Out-of-School Workforce
- Creating training programs, professional
standards, and an accreditation process that will
lead to professionalizing the out-of-school field
and increased compensation
14NAAs Afterschool Workforce Survey
- The National AfterSchool Association is
conducting a survey to better understand the
afterschool/youth workers workforce. Please take
a few minutes to fill it out. - http//snap-surveys.com/2cr/eng/
15Using the Example of Military Child Development
Centers
- Staff turnover rates in military child
development centers have been reduced by 300
annually since the Military Child Care Act was
passed by Congress in 1989. The Act paved the
way for a training system in which staff receive
ongoing training and education that is linked to
increases in compensation (Duff Campbell et al.,
2000 cited by NIOST 2003).
16- In short, recruiting more teachers will not
solve the teacher crisis if 40 to 50 percent of
such teachers then leave within five yearsThe
image that comes to mind is a bucket rapidly
losing water because of holes in the bottom.
Pouring more water into the bucket will not be
the answer if the holes are not first patched
(Ingersoll 2004).
17- Leadership is the key to halting the revolving
door of turnover, guaranteeing staff a living
wage and making working with children and youth
during non-school hours an attractive career
option. Despite isolated gains across the
country, the workforce crisis will not resolve
itself. Leaders from national, state and local
agencies, both public and private, must make
building a skilled and stable workforce a
priority before measurable gains will be made
(NIOST 2003).
18What can your organization do?
19- Respondents to the 2001 National Career
Development Survey of early childhood/school-age
staff reported that stipends, wage supplement
programs, scholarships and loan preferred
strategies to combating staff turnover (Wheelock
College Institute for Leadership and Career
Initiatives, 2002 cited by NIOST 2003).
20Suggestions for Organizations
- Focus on
- Increasing organizational support for staff
- Treating the field of teaching as a respected
profession - Attempt to raise salaries or benefits
- Integrate staff suggestions into solving behavior
problems and program policies that affect their
work - Increase parental involvement
21Open Discussion
- Possible Discussion Questions
- What other factors do you believe are linked to
staff turnover in your program? - What other things can be done by your
organization to address this problem? - What other issues should researchers and
national-level organizations focus on?
22- Jennifer Buher-Kane
- Senior Research Coordinator
- Out-of-School Time Resource Center
- University of Pennsylvania
- 3815 Walnut Street, 3rd floor
- Philadelphia, PA 19104
- (215) 898-2505
- jbuher_at_sp2.upenn.edu
23References
- BEST Strengthens Youth Worker Practice An
Evaluation of Building Exemplary Systems for
Training Youth Workers (BEST), 2002,
http//www.aed.org/ToolsandPublications/upload/bes
t.pdf - Halpern, R., After-School Programs for
Low-Income Children Promise and Challenges. The
Future of Children, When School is Out, Vol. 9,
No. 2, Fall 1999. - Ingersoll, Richard. Why do High-Poverty Schools
Have Difficulty Staffing Their Classrooms with
Qualified Teachers? Report prepared for Renewing
Our Schools, Securing Our Future, A national Task
Force on Public Education, November 2004. - Lowe Vandell, D. and Shumow, L., After School
Child Care Programs, The Future of Children,
When School is Out, Vol. 9, No. 2, Fall 1999. - NIOST, Spotlight 2001, http//www.niost.org/public
ations/spotlight_2001.html - NIOST, Making the Case A Fact Sheet on children
and Youth in Out-of-School Time, January 2003. - NIOST, Strategic Plan Building a Skilled and
Stable Out-of-School Time Workforce, September
2003. - TASC Staff Retention Model, 2001,
http//www.tascorp.org/toolbox/promising_practices
/staff_retention?skinprintable