Teachers and Learners in Inclusive Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Teachers and Learners in Inclusive Schools

Description:

specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parent, ... Added infants and toddlers. Required IFSP for young children. IFSP. Individual Family Service Plan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: roxanne2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teachers and Learners in Inclusive Schools


1
Teachers and Learners in Inclusive Schools
  • Special Education Law
  • Spring, 2005

2
Special Ed. Law
  • Terms
  • Evolution of the law
  • Elements of IDEA

3
  • Special Education is.
  • specially designed instruction, at no cost to
    the parent, to meet the unique needs of a child
    with a disability, including instruction
    conducted in the classroom, in the home, in
    hospitals and institutions, and in other
    settings
  • (34 Code of Federal 17 a 1)

4
Alphabet Soup!
  • EHA Education for All Handicapped Act
  • IDEA Individuals with Disabilities
    Education Act
  • FAPE Free Appropriate Public Education
  • IEP Individualized Education Program
  • IFSP Individualized Family Service Plan
  • ITP Individual Transition Plan
  • LRE Least Restrictive Environment

5
Evolution of a Law
  • PL 94-142 The Education for All Handicapped
    Children Act (EHA)
  • Passed in 1975
  • Enacted in 1977
  • Five elements of the law
  • FAPE
  • IEP
  • LRE
  • Non-discriminatory assessment
  • Due process

6
FAPE
  • Free and appropriate education for all children
    regardless of amount of need or cost
  • Access to education for all children is
    guaranteed at no cost to the parent
  • Zero reject policy

7
IEP
  • Individualized Education Program (Plan)
  • Requirements
  • Statement of present levels of performance
  • Measurable annual goals
  • Statement of educational and related services
  • Date of initiation of services and duration
  • Criteria for annual reassessment
  • - The amount of time the student will not
  • spend with same-age typical peers

8
IEP cont.
  • Members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
  • Students parent(s) or guardian
  • Student if older
  • At least one special education teacher
  • Representative of the local agency who authorizes
    funding for services
  • Someone to interpret evaluation results (school
    psychologist)
  • Other individuals with special expertise
  • or knowledge (advocate, OT, Speech
  • therapist, etc)

9
LRE
  • States must have procedures to ensure that, to
    the maximum extent appropriate, children with
    disabilities, including those in public/private
    institutions, are educated with non-disabled
    children and that removal from the regular
    education environment only occurs when education
    in that setting, with supplementary aids and
    services, cannot be achieved satisfactorily.
  • (Public Law 94-142, 1975,
  • Sec. 612, 5, B)

10
Non-Discriminatory Assessment
  • Assessment cannot be culturally discriminatory
  • Students must be tested in their dominant
    language
  • Nonverbal IQ scores can be used if tested in
    non-native language
  • No single procedure can be used to
  • determine educational placement

11
Due Process
  • Written notification is required before initial
    evaluations and placements
  • Parents must be invited to an IEP meeting three
    times before it is held without them
  • Parents have the right to challenge school
    district findings
  • Parents may get an independent educational
    evaluation
  • Parents have the right to an impartial due
    process hearing
  • Parents have the right to appeal the findings
    and decisions of a hearing
  • A student may not be placed in special
  • education without due process

12
Evolution of a Law cont.
  • PL 99-457 First reauthorization of EHA
  • 1986
  • Added infants and toddlers
  • Required IFSP for young children

13
IFSP
  • Individual Family Service Plan
  • Childs present levels of functioning
  • Family resources, priorities, concerns
  • Major outcomes for child and family
  • Early intervention services to be offered to
    family
  • Natural environments they will be offered in
  • Dates of initiation and duration
  • Family service coordinator
  • Childs transition plan to IEP

14
Evolution of a Law cont.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Act or IDEA
  • 1990
  • Changed the language of the law to persons with
    disabilities
  • Added autism and traumatic brain injury as
    categories
  • Required transition services no later than age 16

15
Transition Plan Requirements
  • Beginning at age 16 and each year after,
    statement of students needs as related to
    transition from school to life
  • Beginning at age 16, a statement of transition
    needs and needed linkages to community and
    post-school agencies
  • Statement of rights under IDEA that will
    transfer to student at age 18
  • How progress on transition goals and
  • objectives will be measured

16
People First Language
  • Instead of handicapped or disabled,
  • USE
  • person with a disability
  • students with learning disabilities
  • children with autism
  • individuals with cerebral palsy
  • developmentally delayed students
  • BUT ALSO USE.
  • deaf people,
    child, adult
  • blind
    person, students
  • the blind
    the deaf

17
Evolution of a Law cont.
  • Reauthorization of IDEA
  • 1997
  • General education teachers now required at IEP
    meetingsIEP team must have at least one
  • Support for teachers professional development
  • IDEA funds may be used to pay for services even
    non-disabled students may benefit from
  • Charter schools must serve students with
    disabilities
  • Discipline changes
  • IEP must include access to general education
  • curriculum
  • Students with disabilities must be included in
  • state and district assessments

18
Evolution of Law Continued
  • 2004 reauthorization of IDEA, PL108-466
  • - Discipline placement requires evaluation if
    behavior is result of disability or poor IEP
    implementation
  • - States submit performance plans plans
    addressing improvement in racial and ethnic
    representation
  • - Alignment with NCLB to include alternate
    assessments, and reporting of graduation rates
    and dropout rates
  • - IEP benchmarks and short term objectives
    required only for students with alternative
    assessments/standards

19
Specific learning Disabilities
  • Aptitude achievement discrepancy model modified
    in order to speed up identification before
    failure
  • - Districts may use data from a scientific,
    research based intervention as part of
    evaluation

20
Highly Qualified Special Ed.Teachers
  • New standards aligned with NCLB
  • - Bachelors degree
  • - Full state special ed. certification(
    includes alternative certification)
  • - Special ed. teachers teaching 2 or more
    academic subjects also required to meet both
    grade level and subject area competence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com