Economic Theory of Environmental Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Economic Theory of Environmental Policy

Description:

... to intervention. As means of intervention. Criticisms. Bargaining is not free: ... Example of Title IV in 1990 Clean Air Act. How to interpret Coase? Strictly? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: davidl52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic Theory of Environmental Policy


1
Economic Theory of Environmental Policy
  • David Letson
  • University of Miami

2
Main Points
  • Pollution as an externality.
  • Hayeks coordination problem.
  • Coases bargaining solution.
  • Implications for policy design.

3
Pollution as an Externality
  • Externality a loss not compensated.
  • Pollution
  • a physical effect on the environment and,
  • second, a human response.

4
Market failure raises questions
  • How should we allocate resources?
  • What is property?
  • Non-excludability implies overuse.

5
Hayeks coordination problem
  • Interdependence of decisions.
  • Whether to intervene and how.
  • Stringency.
  • Centralized versus decentralized approaches.

6
Decentralized Approaches
  • Have we exhausted useful regulatory strategies?
  • Easy, obvious offenders have been addressed.
  • Technological limits.
  • Hostility results in costly litigation.
  • Who knows best?

7
When is decentralized not best?
  • If decisions are inter-dependent.
  • If people do not cooperate.

8
Ronald Coase
  • Efficient solution as a bargain.
  • Symmetric result.
  • A patch for the missing market.
  • Negotiation
  • As alternative to intervention.
  • As means of intervention.

9
Criticisms
  • Bargaining is not free
  • Extent of market
  • Strategic behavior
  • Imperfect competition
  • Wealth effects
  • Nonconvexity

10
Effluent Taxes
  • Arthur Pigou.
  • Equalizes MC of abatement across sources.
  • Comparison to subsidies.
  • Revenue recycling.

11
Tradable permits
  • Comparison to command and control.
  • Better than effluent taxes?
  • Example of Title IV in 1990 Clean Air Act

12
How to interpret Coase?
  • Strictly? Implies no public intervention.
  • Coases original intent, in a 1988 article.
  • Less strict interpretation High transactions
    costs may justify intervention.

13
Coases Contribution (I)
  • Delegate decisions, even within regulations
  • Project XL,
  • Toxics Release Inventory,
  • Brownfields,
  • Common Sense Initiative,
  • Community-based Environmental Protection,
  • Pollution Prevention.

14
Coases Contribution (II)
  • USEPA Administrator Carol Browner Providing the
    public with basic environmental information
  • allows businesses to eliminate inefficiencies
    that create pollution and reduce profits, and
  • allows citizens to participate effectively in
    decisions that affect their families and
    communities.

15
Conclusions
  • How best to protect environment?
  • Decentralized approach attractive.
  • Delegate decisions to those who know more.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com