CSSRQS 1'0 SRI Quality Assurance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CSSRQS 1'0 SRI Quality Assurance

Description:

use a research methodology which allows identification of best practices and ' ... Research standards and indicators. Research and evaluation methodologies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Kurt166
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CSSRQS 1'0 SRI Quality Assurance


1
CSSR-QS 1.0 SRI Quality Assurance
also
representing
  • TBLI 2003, Amsterdam, November 6-7,
    2003,Workshop Corporate Ratings
  • A Quality Standard for CorporateSustainability
    and Responsibility Research
  • Stephen HINE (EIRIS), Herwig Peeters (ETHIBEL),
    Kirein FRANCK (imug)

2

ADVANCING SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTING
Developing a Voluntary Quality Standard for
Corporate Sustainabilityand Responsibility
Research
CFIE Centre Français dInformationsur les
Entreprises
3
Three sets of complaints inthe disclosure
triangle
  • Lacking responsiveness
  • Greenwashing reports, cherry picking
  • Insufficient strategic integration of CSR
  • Boring questionnaires
  • Annoying phone calls
  • Too many questionnaires
  • Non harmonised conclusions

Companies
CSR/SRIresearch
Investors
  • Avoiding financial issues
  • Confusing methodologies
  • Lack for long-term track record

4
CSRR-QS 1.0
  • A quality standard comprising guidelines and
    rules, commitments and proofs on the transparency
    and quality and on the accountability and
    verifiability of the processes involved in
    Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility
    Research (CSRR)
  • Drawn up by a number of independent CSRR Groups
    mostly supporting and servicing SRI
  • The first quality standard conceived and worked
    out at sector level in the field of CSR and SRI
    research and analysis

5
Voluntary Quality Standard (1)
  • Stage 1
  • Setting the standard
  • 17 CSRR Groups, working in 4 Project Groups
    (WG)WG1 Verifiable IndicatorsWG2 Quality
    ProceduresWG3 Integrity RulesWG4
    Implementation
  • Stage 2Stakeholder consultationPiloting within
    CSRR Groups Expert consultationStakeholder
    dialogue
  • Feedback processes

www.csrr-qs.org
6
Voluntary Quality Standard (2)
  • Stage 3Set-up verification processAccreditation
    instituteLegal status juridical set up
  • Preparing the verification processSelection of
    certification body
  • Stage 4
  • Execution of the audit and verificationIndividua
    l CSRR Group guidance and initial auditMain
    auditAudit and certification

www.csrr-qs.org
7
CSRR - QS 1.0
  • Although currently European, in due course
    international CSRR Groups will be engaged with,
    in order to encourage participation in, and
    adoption of, the standard. A fully international
    standard is the objective.
  • Prior to the setting-up of the standard a
    detailed survey was undertaken in order to make
    an inventory of existing practices on the level
    of quality management
  • Initiated - in part - by the EC, Employment and
    Social Affairs DG as the outcome of the project
    Developing a Voluntary Quality for SRI Research

8
The EC Green Paper Promoting a European
frameworkfor Corporate Social Responsibility
defines CSR as ...
WHAT
  • taking up the triple bottom line approach by
    going voluntarily beyond legal requirements in
    offering fair deals to stakeholders while having
    a dialogue with them

9
A new framework ...
EU APPROACH
dialogue
instruments
business case
10
Convergence, diversity and transparency of CSR
tools
  • An emerging market with many specialised
    screening agencies, using different tools and
    metrics
  • Companies overloaded with excessive information
    requests
  • Convergence between indicators developed by
    companies and the criteria used by analysts
  • Ensure quality and objectivity, not only on the
    basis of the information submitted by the
    management, but also by the stakeholders
  • External audit and internal quality procedures
    should be used to assure accuracy in the research
    and assessment processes

11
The Ten Commitments
  • CSSR Groups commit to
  •  
  • 1 Independent sources assess/rate companies
    using more than company-provided information,
    such as independently collected data, regulatory
    sources, and information from stakeholders
  • 2 Global activities ensure that
    assessments/ratings include the relevant global
    impacts and operations of the quoted company
  • 3 Beyond compliance use a research methodology
    which allows identification of best practices and
    'beyond compliance' performance.
  • 4 Social and environmental include criteria
    covering environmental and social areas
  • 5 Balance ensure a balanced approach to
    corporate assessment/ratings by balancing
    quantitative and qualitative indicators,
    management oriented and performance indicators,
    past and current performance

12
The Ten Commitments
  • 6 Relevance/Materiality ensure
    assessments/ratings capture issues material to or
    relevant for the sustainability and
    responsibility of that company
  • 7 Consistency and comparability ensure that the
    criteria and methodology are applied equally to
    comparable companies
  • 8 Stakeholder involvement actively include
    inputs and information, wherever possible, from
    relevant stakeholders
  • 9 Up-to-date ensure assessments of companies
    are updated
  • 10 Transparency be transparent about the
    methodology

13
Integrity principles and ethical commitments of
CSRR - QS 1.0
  • 1 Independence
  • 2 Professionalism
  • 3 Accountability
  • 4 Objectivity
  • 5 Impartiality
  • 6 Equal treatment
  • 7 Responsible relationships
  • 8 Selective disclosure
  • 9 Avoidance of personal interest

14
CSRR QS 1.0
Up-to-date lists of signatoriesand
specifications on standardsand guidance may be
obtainedonly on the website www.csrr-qs.org(d
ecember 2003)
  • quality management systems transparency
    rules assurance guidelines terms of
    reference verification processes

15
Some elements of the CSRR QS 1.0 (1)
  • Independence, impartiality and integrity
  • Confidentiality
  •   
  • Organisation and management
  •  
  • Well established quality management systems
    Policies and objectives
  • Effective and appropriate quality systems
  • Quality manual and well maintained
    documentation related to quality control
  • Quality manager
  • Qualified personnel
  • Feedback and corrective
  • Review of the quality system at appropriate
    intervals
  •  

16
Some elements of the CSRR QS 1.0 (2)
  • Research standards and indicators
  • Research and evaluation methodologies
  • Clear systems and tools for managing its
    research processes First instrumental basis for
    quality management and control
    CSRR-QS-logbook
  • Second instrumental basis CSSR Groups
    company data record keeping system Adequate
    documented and auditable instructions on the
    CSRR data collecting process 
  • Protocol regarding the relation with companies
  • Adequate documented and auditable
    instructions on the CSRR data processing
  • Adequate documented and auditable
    instructions on the CSRR evaluation processes

17
Some bricks of the CSRR QS 1.0 (3)
  • The CSRR-TM, the Transparency Matrixis the
    calibrated instrument to disclose the main
    features of their research and evaluation
    approach and methodologies
  • Stakeholder involvement
  • Stakeholder dialogue is considered to be a
    quality issue with respect to CSRR processes
    Important component of the standard Clear
    policies and processes. A variety of ways in
    systems and methodologies is possible
    Continuous improvement of its stakeholder
    involvement processes targets
  • Reports and other outputs and communications
  • Sub-contracting
  • Complaints and appeals
  • Co-operation

18
Social basis through stakeholder dialogue
  • The social basis and the added value originate
    from stakeholder communication, possibly on
    different levels
  • Data collecting
  • Double checking of information
  • Debate on criteria and methodology
  • Quality control
  • Evaluation, rating, ranking
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com