Title: A preliminary evaluation of the role of nurse, midwife and health visitor consultants
1A preliminary evaluation of the role of nurse,
midwife and health visitor consultants
- Funder Department of Health
- Kings College London
- David Guest , Sally Redfern
- Jenifer Wilson-Barnett, Riccardo Peccei, Patrice
Rosenthal - Birkbeck College - Philip Dewe
- Nurse Researchers
- Amanda Evans, Cath Young
2Aims of study
- compare activities across consultant types
- hospital, community, mental health, midwifery
- identify innovation in practice
- investigate
- job control and demands
- workload, role clarity, role conflict
- career and growth opportunities
3Role specification from DoH
- expert practice - 50
- professional leadership/consultancy
- education/training/staff development
- service development/research/evaluation
- introduced into all NHS contexts (England)
- acute hospital care
- community care
- mental health
- midwifery
4Breakdown by specialty ()
- acute specialty (area) 58
- acute specialty (condition) 11
- mental health 17
- midwifery 11
- community/primary care 4
- learning disability 3
5Previous research on CNS/ANPs
- high expectations
- work overload
- role confusion
- lack of management, admin, peer support
- sustainable or doomed to failure?
6Methods - 3 components Accounts of incidents and
experiences
- 32 consultants interviewed by telephone over time
- 4-5 per individual, total 138 interviews
- selected across region and type
- 4 MWs, 3 HVs
- 25 nurses 7 acute-area, 5 acute-disease, 5 MH, 4
eld, 2 child, 2 LD - questions on challenges, problems, support,
hindrances, achievements, learning
7Role network analysis
- 10 case studies of consultants in their role
context - 1-2 day visits per case
- 2 MWs, 2 HVs 6 nurses 1 acute-area, 1
acute-dis, 2 MH, 1 eld, 1 LD - interviews with consultants and key members of
role network - informal observation
- document analysis
8Questionnaire survey
- all consultants in post January 2001 (158)
- H (83), C (35), MH (25), MW (10)
- questions on
- involvement in activities
- current-previous job comparison
- job control, complexity
- role clarity, conflict, workload
- rewards (career/prof growth)
- response 153 (95)
9Involvement in role functions in present and
previous jobs (n153)
responses rated on 5-point scale 1 not
involved to 5 I take the lead in the
activity all significant at plt.001
10Pattern of involvement across functions
score of 4 or above on 5-point scale
statistically significant difference across
consultant types at plt.05 level statistically
significant difference across consultant types at
plt.01 level
11Job characteristic and work experience scales
- job control
- job demands
- workload
- role clarity
- role conflict
- career opps
- growth opps
autonomy, discretion difficulty,
complexity overload, time pressure on duties,
responsibilities incompatible demands promotion,
advancement professional development
12Task characteristics high scorers
(147) (78) (34) (25) (10)
No significant differences across consultant type
13Role stressors high scorers
(147) (78) (34) (25) (10)
statistically significant across consultant
types at plt.05 level
14Job rewards high scorers
(147) (78) (34) (25) (10)
No significant differences across consultant type
15Lessons learned
- able to cope with job complexity
- professional rewards high
- work overload, role ambiguity need careful
handling - increase in workload over time needs confirmation
- danger of job becoming unmanageable, burnout
- pre-entry clarity and management support
essential to ability to cope with pressures
16Lessons learned
- innovation is a feature of consultant role
- increase in
- leadership
- RD
- training
- expert practice
17The follow-up study
- DoH funded
- same team Samantha Coster
- additional aims
- impact on practice and outcomes
- investigate
- leadership
- job crafting
- work-non-work balance
- ends March 2004
18Access to reports
- http//www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/nru/nru_res_rep.html
- http//www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/pse/mancen/staff/davi
d.guest.html