Information Assurance in Sensor Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Information Assurance in Sensor Networks

Description:

Information Assurance in Sensor Networks. B. Deb, S. Bhatnagar, and B. Nath. Rutgers University ... Hop distance (h) to sink known. Ability to classify ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: iannathan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information Assurance in Sensor Networks


1
Information Assurance in Sensor Networks
  • B. Deb, S. Bhatnagar, and B. Nath
  • Rutgers University
  • WSNA 2003

2
Introduction
  • Not all information is equal
  • Classification into Assurance Levels
  • Reliability and delay targets
  • Higher importance higher targets
  • Current approaches are boolean
  • Penalty in energy or assurance
  • Delivery effort proportional to criticality

3
Problem Scenario
  • Delivery of information with reliability r
  • Key assumptions
  • Symmetric links
  • Single sink
  • Hop distance (h) to sink known
  • Ability to classify information
  • Ability to cache packets
  • Methods to examine
  • Unicast (HHR and HHRA)
  • Broadcast (HHB and HHBA)

4
Hop-by-Hop Reliability (HHR)
  • Source sends packet copies to one next hop
  • Hop reliability
  • gt 1 transmission needed if
  • Epackets sent NHHR Eoverhead OHHR

5
HHR Acks (HHRA)
  • Assume acks always received
  • Source sends only if last packet lost
  • Never send more than NHHR packets

6
Comparison Plots
7
Broadcast Extension
  • Number of packets sent decreases
  • Want only one receiver to forward packet
  • Done probabilistically

8
Broadcast Extension (2)
  • Overhead for HHB and HHBA
  • Under assumption that ri r1/h
  • Optimal allocation for ri can be found for HBBA
  • r1 r, ri1 for all other i gt1

9
Scheme Comparisons
10
Scheme Comparisons
11
Conclusions
  • Optimal link reliabilities independent of network
  • Broadcast medium reduces overhead significantly
  • Ack-based schemes should be used if possible
  • Future work
  • Weaken assumptions
  • Vary MAC to introduce collisions
  • Simulation/implementation verification
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com