Evaluation of Digital Libraries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of Digital Libraries

Description:

Mental Models of USERS. MENTAL MODELS OF SEARCHING (DANIELS ARTICLE, ... EBSCO and Bell & Howell databases use data provided by the vendors (January June 1999) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: GLIS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of Digital Libraries


1
Evaluation of Digital Libraries
  • Iris Xie

2
Evaluation Approaches
  • Information Retrieval approach
  • Library evaluation approach
  • User-centered approach
  • Interface evaluation

3
INFORMATION RETRIEVAL APPROACH
  • PERFORMANCE MEASURES
  • DEFINITIONS OF RELEVANCE USER-CENTERED VS SYTEMS
    ORIENTED DEFINITIONS
  • Recall
  • Precision

4
LIBRARY EVALUATION APPROACH
  • COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
  • BUDGET ANALYSIS
  • PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
  • COLLECTION EVALUATION

5
USER-CENTERED EVALUATION
  • SUCCESS
  • SATISFACTION
  • USES AND USAGE
  • INDIVIDUAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC IMPACT
  • READING HABITS
  • SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION

6
Mental Models of USERS
  • MENTAL MODELS OF SEARCHING (DANIELS ARTICLE,
    EXPANDING UNIVERSE TOOL TO SIMULATE
    CONVENTIONAL LIBRARY STRUCTURE)
  • STUDIES OF ADAPTATION OF PRE-EXISTING MENTAL
    MODELS TO NEW SEARCHING ENVIRONMENT

7
HUMAN FACTORS STUDIES
  • STUDY PEOPLES RESPONSES TO PROTOTYPE DIGITAL
    LIBRARIES
  • PRIMARILY USABILITY ANALYSIS
  • ITERATIVE DESIGN
  • DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST, EVALUATE, REDESIGN,
    RETEST

8
Interface Evaluation
  • Database selection/classification of all the
    materials
  • navigation
  • Query formulations and reformulations
  • Search features
  • Browsing features
  • Help system

9
Evaluation of a Statewide Digital Library
  • State-wide initiatives to facilitate access to
    database vendor resources via Internet
  • Available since Fall 1998 to residents of
    Wisconsin
  • Provides web-based access to full text and
    bibliographic databases from EBSCOhost and
    ProQuest
  • Accessible with dedicated access (known users)
    and dial-in access (unknown users)

10
Methodology
  • EBSCO and Bell Howell databases use data
    provided by the vendors (January June 1999)
  • 239 library responses towards the BadgerLink
    service collected by questionnaire
  • 81 individual user responses towards the
    BadgerLink service collected by Web survey

11
Vendor Data
  • Type of user usage
  • Database usage
  • Title usage
  • Search and browsing behavior

12
Research Questions for Libraries
  • How is the statewide digital library service
    used?
  • Who are the users?
  • Which factors impact how the service is used?
  • What is the impact of the availability of the
    service on the usage of physical libraries within
    the state?

13
Model for Successful Implementation of State
Digital Library Service    
14
Research Questions for Individual Users
  • Who are the most frequent users? And what are the
    primary BadgerLink access sites?
  • How do users learn how to use BadgerLink? And
    what do they use Badgerlink for?
  • Which database and title resources are most
    frequently accessed?
  • What are users searching and browsing behaviors?

15
Further Research
  • Statewide digital library design should satisfy
    diverse user needs
  • target nonusers and infrequent users and
    determine their needs and attitudes
  • Develop model for the successful implementation
    of general purpose digital library
  • In-depth study of how individual users seek
    information in general purpose digital library
    for system design

16
EVALUATION ISSUES I
  • WHAT ARE APPROPRIATE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DLS
    HOW CAN WE COMBINE IR LIBRARY MODELS
  • SHOULD WE STUDY REAL USERS WITH REAL INFORMATION
    NEEDS?
  • WHAT COMPONENT OF THE DL WILL BE EVALUATED?
    (INTERFACE COLLECTION ETC.)

17
EVALUATION ISSUES II
  • HOW CAN WE EVALUATE INTERACTION IN DIGITAL
    LIBRARIES?
  • INCORPORATING MULTIPLE METHODS OF EVALUATION
  • HOW GENERALIZABLE ARE RESULTS?
  • COORDINATING DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN CYCLES
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com