... estimates of LOL frequently ignored ... the existing LO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

... estimates of LOL frequently ignored ... the existing LO

Description:

... estimates of LOL frequently ignored ... the existing LOL estimation approaches ... Develop technical guidance on using LOL estimating model for dam failure ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: david154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ... estimates of LOL frequently ignored ... the existing LO


1
33256Estimating Loss of Life From Dam Failure
  • David A. Moser

2
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Problem
  • LOL estimates used in risk assessment of dams
  • To evaluate the life safety risk
  • To assess the life safety benefits
  • To estimate the cost effectiveness
  • All estimating equations suffer from sparse data
  • Very aggregated--event level

3
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Problem cont.
  • Few details of circumstances of individual events
  • Warning time
  • Uncertainty in estimates of LOL frequently
    ignored
  • Traditional Corps data intensive methods to
    calculate population at risk (PAR) infeasible

4
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Objective
  • Review and critique the existing LOL estimation
    approaches
  • Improve and extend the database of historical dam
    failures
  • Quantify uncertainty (random and sample error) in
    estimating models
  • Develop improved LOL estimation model

5
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Objective cont.
  • Apply improved estimating model to demonstrations
  • Develop technical guidance on using LOL
    estimating model for dam failure risk assessment

6
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Approach
  • Collect and analyze historical case studies
  • Breaking down global PARs into sub-PARs
  • Analyzing historical events in greater detail and
    recording insights into life-loss dynamics
  • Estimating predictive the values from more than
    50 variables for each historical event

7
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
Approach cont.
  • Develop capability for using the US Census GIS
    data base with the DAMBRK (or its successor,
    FLDWAV) model output
  • Results provide input for the LOL estimation
    model
  • Quantify the additional PAR and other variable
    uncertainty contributions to predicted LOL
    uncertainty
  • Test the new approach as part of site
    demonstration

8
Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure
New Model
  • 12-step algorithm for characterizing those
    aspects of a flood event that are pertinent to
    life loss
  • Each PAR reduce to homogeneous subPar
  • Par type (Pt)
  • Excess evacuation time (E)
  • Loss of shelter (Ls)
  • Each subPar is then reduced to a threatened
    subpopulation (Tpari) using evacuation function

9
(No Transcript)
10
Some noteworthy observations
  • Differences between case histories
  • Short time needed to evacuate in many, but not
    all, cases
  • Role of chance
  • Role of safe havens (structures)
  • Implications for evacuation

11
Terminology
  • PARPopulation at Risk
  • Population that would be flooded if they took no
    measures to leave
  • TPARThreatened Population
  • Population remaining at risk after evacuation
  • WtWarning Time
  • Time from when warning is issued until arrival of
    flood
  • RetRepresentative Evacuation Time
  • Evacuation time for a particular Par
  • EExcess Evacuation Time
  • Wt Ret

12
LIFE LOSS
EVACUATION
Evacuate
Survive
PAR
Remain
TPAR
LOL
Life Loss
13
New Life Loss Estimation Model

DAMBRK

FLDWAV

HEC
-
FIA

HEC
-
V2.0

GeoRAS

MIKE 21

GIS Layers

Depth
v
.
t

Velocity
v
.
t

HEC

HEC

Travel Time

Structures

SubPAR
Land use

Definition

PAR
(t0)


Evacuation

Structures

Trans
.

model

SubPAR
(t0)

Performance

Simplified
Evac

Structures

d
amage

Model

PCDYNEV

Loss of
D
yn
.
Model

Loss of shelter

Shelter


SubPAR
at
arrival

Loss of Life

Survival/
Life loss

Loss of Life

Summary


14
Velocity-Depth Relationships for Structural
Performance
depth
(m)
10
3 story
9
8
7
2 story
6
5
4
3
1 story
2
1
1
2
3
velocity (m/s)
(Source Green et al 2000)
15
Evacuation Nonsuccess Factor (Ef) vs. Excess
Evacuation Time (E) (mins.)
- 0 Evac
- 100
16
Identify Levels of Flood Exposure Based on
Life-Loss Patterns
evacuate ?
LOL
safe zone (Sz)
PAR
compromised zone (Coz)
remain (Tpari) ?
chance zone (Cz)
17
Probability Distributions of Life Loss Rate for
Safe (sz), Compromised (coz) and Chance (cz) Zones
18
FY02 Activities
  • Complete parameterization of LOL predictive model
  • Apply LOL model to Hills Creek demonstration
  • Design document for application of GIS (census,
    warning time, other) with links to LOL model
  • Technical procedures manual for predicting LOL
    for dam failure risk assessment
  • Training materials for estimating LOL for dam
    safety
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com