Utah Division of Water Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Utah Division of Water Rights

Description:

x:xmpmeta xmlns:x='adobe:ns:meta/' x:xmptk='3.1.1-111' rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' rdf:Description rdf:about ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: state
Category:
Tags: bud | com | division | ino | mra | rights | utah | water

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Utah Division of Water Rights


1
The changing world of Water Rights
http//waterrights.utah.gov
Rural Water Association of Utah Annual
Conference
March 3, 2009
Boyd Clayton
2
(No Transcript)
3
Water and Economic Development
  • Is water necessary for growth?
  • Have water rights helped in the past?
  • What should be their future role?

Supply is limited Comes erratically Not generally
where needed
4
Water as the gasoline of Utah Economic Growth
  • Cost
  • Uncertainty
  • Delay
  • No resource use fee
  • Defined system of priority
  • Set process to secure rights

5
Utah Division of Water Rights Mission
  • Promote order and certainty in the beneficial use
    of Utahs water.

6
State Engineer Water Right Roles
  • Maintain public water right records
  • Administer appropriation process
  • Supervise diversion and use of water
  • Issue Proposed Determinations for courts
  • Encourage water right law compliance
  • Public Welfare Concerns

7
Utah Water Right Fundamentals
  • All waters property of public (73-1-1)
  • Specific process to obtain rights (73-3-1)
  • Beneficial use is water right limit (73-1-3)
  • Beneficial use is a public use (73-1-5)
  • Priority is given to first in time (73-3-1)
  • Failure to use subjects to forfeiture (73-1-4)
  • Water rights transfer by deed (73-1-10)

8
Water Right Administrative Process
  • Application to State Engineer
  • State Engineer approval processing
  • SE issues conditional permit to develop
  • Applicant develops and submits proof
  • SE issues certificate (ends administration)

9
Informal Approval Processing
  • Public record of application
  • Public Notice (2 weeks)
  • Invite Comment (20 days)
  • Hearing / Collect facts (6 months)
  • Weigh facts against statutory criteria
  • Issue final decision (order) to all parties
  • Judicial Review (if required)

10
Approval Criteria (73-3-8)
  • Make full use of scarce water supplies
  • Protect existing rights
  • Encourage best (most beneficial?) uses
  • Discourage controlling water/speculation
  • Protect public

11
Approval Balance
New Beneficial Use
Public Interest
Existing Rights
12
Extensions of time
  • Provides for the continuance of viable permits,
    dropping of those without diligence.
  • Allows affected rights to intervene after 14
    years.
  • Allows for a reduction of priority in cases where
    actual use is far removed from application.
  • Provides long development cycle protection for
    public agencies and power cooperatives.

13
Water Right Management
14
Changing TimesNew Challenges
15
Key Issue New Water Cost
  • Value in holding rather than sowing
  • Change statute fabric stretching
  • Measurement/Management dilemma
  • More direct money/delay connection
  • Conservation paradigm vs Use benefit

16
Questions???
  • What is beneficial use? Is it a use which
    generates economic benefit in excess of the cost
    of the practice (benefit/cost ratio gt 1)?
  • Is the goal still to use water to produce a
    benefit?
  • Is there more to priority than a date?
  • Is forfeiture still fundamental? If not what is
    the effect?
  • The deed system is developed to work with land.
    As land and water become decoupled does it still
    work?

17
Change Applications (73-3-3)
  • Convert existing water right or permit to new
    POD, USE, and/or POU (Relinquishment)
  • Limited to equivalency
  • May not impair vested rights
  • If otherwise proper worth something
  • Keeps priority
  • Same administrative process
  • Creates new perfected right

18
Changing Questions
  • Who is a person entitled to the use of water?
    Concerns about nonuse persist
  • How can equivalent uses be identified if the
    record doesnt define extent of existing use?
  • Supply reliability
  • Surface/Groundwater Interaction?
  • What interference is unreasonable?
  • Is it always the SEs job to find a solution?

19
Change Application Decisions
  •      (7) (a) Except as provided by Section
    73-3-30, the state engineer may not reject a
    permanent or temporary change application for the
    sole reason that the change would impair a vested
    water right.     (b) If otherwise proper, the
    state engineer may approve a permanent or
    temporary change application for part of the
    water involved or upon the condition that the
    applicant acquire the conflicting water right.

20
Record WrestlingWater rights are like
snowflakes, No two are alike.
21
Water Right Types
  • Unperfected Application
  • Certificated Right
  • Decree
  • Federal Reserved Right
  • Diligence Claim
  • Unrecorded Right
  • Shares of Stock in a Water Company

22
Record Uses
  • Commerce (who has what)
  • Regulation (distribution / enforcement)
  • Administrative processing
  • History
  • Water management planning

23
Record Issues
  • Proof Quality Goal is to show what is being
    done to divert and beneficially use water within
    the constraints of the approved application.
    Certificate is a reflection of proof. Inaccurate
    proofs lead to poorly defined records.
  • Sole Supply Define limit of rights today so
    there wont be delays and confusion in the
    future.
  • Segregations Growing need for standards and
    procedures as practice broadens.
  • Current ownership and contact information

24
Records of Interest
  • Nonuse Application
  • Exchange Application
  • Water User Claim
  • Proposed Determination

25
Reaching For New Heights
  • Eliminate certificate backlog
  • Eliminate change backlog
  • Streamline approval process
  • Focused adjudication effort
  • Measurement emphasis
  • Work with willing participants

26
2009 Legislation
  • Water Right Bills
  • Rainwater (sb128,sb58)
  • Small domestic applications hb389
  • Adjudication Amendments hb383
  • Extensions/Segregations hb18
  • Appeals hb19
  • Leasing municipal water hjr16
  • Water right exactions hb68
  • Priority/Preference hb241
  • Livestock on public lands hb256
  • Deed addendums defining water rights hb366
  • Fee Increases (new fee stream alts, protests)

27
73-3-21.   Priorities between appropriators.    
Appropriators shall have priority among
themselves according to the dates of their
respective appropriations, so that each
appropriator shall be entitled to receive his
whole supply before any subsequent appropriator
shall have any right provided, in times of
scarcity, while priority of appropriation shall
give the better right as between those using
water for the same purpose, the use for domestic
purposes, without unnecessary waste, shall have
preference over use for all other purposes, and
use for agricultural purposes shall have
preference over use for any other purpose except
domestic use.
28
Water Right Classes
  • Public Water Suppliers
  • Livestock on Public Land
  • Small Domestic
  • Everyone Else

29
In the endPriorities are everything
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com