Master Teacher Certification Redelivery Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 84
About This Presentation
Title:

Master Teacher Certification Redelivery Training

Description:

Student Performance Templates: Examples of Questions ... review verifies the local school recommendation to submit or not submit the application to PSC. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 85
Provided by: phyl74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Master Teacher Certification Redelivery Training


1
Master Teacher CertificationRedelivery Training
  • Presenters Ginny Elliott
  • Winifred Nweke
  • Tom Higgins

2
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • The Legislation and Purpose of the Program
    (Slides 3-7)
  • Benefits for the School, School System and the
    Teacher (Slides 8-9)
  • Application process for Master Teacher 2009
    (Slides 10-22)
  • Two Application Formats - 3 categories (Slide 22)
  • CRCT Application Format (Slides 23-36)
  • Monitoring Student Progress Application
    (Non-CRCT) Format (Slides 37-48)
  • Specialty Groups - Special Ed, EIP, ESOL, Gifted,
    Instructional Coach (Slides 49-54)
  • Local School System Information (Slides 55-64)
  • Process for Electronic Submission of Application
    to PSC by Local System Operator (Slides 65-81)
  • Closing Remarks and Contact Information (Slides
    82-84)

3
The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
  • The Professional Standards Commission (PSC) is
    authorized and directed to
  • Establish a Georgia Master Teacher Program
  • to be recognition for teachers excellence in
    the classroom through student achievement and
    student progress

4
The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
  • Establish criteria to include, at a minimum
  • - Evidence of student achievement and student
    progress
  • - Georgia Public School Teacher
  • - Minimum of 3 years of experience on Georgia
    Clear Renewable certificate

5
The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
  • Professional Standards Commission
  • Reviews each application and determines whether
    the applicant meets the criteria.
  • Develops Master Teacher rules and regulations to
    govern the program.
  • Develops the structure to support the
    certification and the recognition.

6
  • The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
  • Master Teacher designation is valid according to
    PSC rule/regulations
  • Master Teacher Certificate is valid for six
    years.
  • Criteria for certification renewal will be
    available in the 2010-2011 school year (the first
    year of renewal)

7
  • Master Teacher Certification reflects
  • DOE Georgia Performance Standards (GPS)
  • Georgia Framework for Teaching

8
Why should systems support the Master Teacher
Certification Program?
  • Identifies teachers who are having an impact on
    student achievement and progress as measured by
    the CRCT and other assessments
  • Can lead to identifying sharing best practices
    among teachers
  • Recognizes additional teachers who have the
    potential to become leaders, mentors, coaches
    for other teachers and thus, may contribute to
    teacher retention

9
Why should teachers want to become Master
Teachers?
  • Recognizes teachers for their impact on student
    achievement and progress
  • Provides teachers feedback that may not be
    available from other sources
  • Gives an opportunity for professional growth
    through sharing, serving, and learning

10
  • Application Process

11
Check eligibility
  • Full-time Georgia public school teacher
  • 3 Years successful experience in Georgia
  • Held a Georgia Clear-Renewable Certificate for at
    least 3 full years

12
Access the web site
  • www.gamasterteachers.org
  • Click on About
  • Carefully read the opening page information
  • Click on Apply and select the appropriate
    school level Elementary, Middle, High School
  • Refer to Support Tools as necessary

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Select the AppropriateGrade Level Option
  • The Grade Level Option selected will contain
    EVERYTHING you need for applying
  • Personal Information page
  • Supporting Documents
  • All directions, templates, and links needed to
    submit the rosters and/or explanation templates
  • Evidence of Professional Responsibilities form
  • Application Verification form
  • A list of documents to be submitted and the file
    name for each document as required in the grade
    level and/or subject area

19
Review Professional Responsibilities
  • Applicant reviews the Evidence of Professional
    Responsibilities form
  • Applicant discusses the Professional
    Responsibilities with the Principal
  • 3. After review, Principal signs Application
    Verification form and submits application file
    electronically to the Local System Coordinator
    (LSC)

20
Professional Responsibilities
  • The teacher must meet the following professional
    practices. The signatures on the Application
    Verification form will confirm the teachers
    implementation of these practices.
  • The teacher
  • Participates in opportunities for Professional
    Learning reflecting personal goals that align
    with school improvement goals and Georgia
    Performance Standards (GPS)
  • Implements exemplary practices that connect to
    student learning and achievement
  • Demonstrates a collaborative and supportive
    relationship with colleagues
  • Provides frequent information to parents, as
    appropriate, about the instructional program
  • Provides information regarding student progress
    to parents
  • Responds to parent concerns with appropriate
    professionalism
  • Develops a classroom management system which is
    easily understood by the students and encourages
    students to self-monitor
  • Exhibits appropriate communication with
    administrators
  • Maintains strict adherence to confidentiality  
  • Models standards of professional conduct to others

21
Support Tools
  • - Critical Vocabulary
  • - Chart for Non-Consecutive Years in the same
    kind
  • of data
  • - Redelivery PowerPoint
  • - Directions for Grades 2-5 Departmentalized
    CRCT
  • and Non-CRCT

22
Application Formats
  • 1. CRCT-Tested Grade Levels and Subject Areas
  • (Grades 2-8)
  • 2. Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT)
  • Kindergarten
  • 1st Grade (No comparison from kindergarten)
  • Grades 9-12
  • Non-Core Curricular Subject Areas (Writing, Art,
    Music, P.E., Business, Technology, etc.)
  • Specialty Groups (e.g. EIP, ESOL, Special
    Education, Gifted in most cases)
  • 3. Instructional Coach
  • NOTE Co-teaching in special education may be
    CRCT or non-CRCT format. Please call Master
    Teacher office if there are any questions.

23
  • CRCT Application
  • State Assessment Data
  • Guidelines and Evaluation

24
Student Achievement Data - State Assessment Data
Guidelines
  • To be considered for Master Teacher
    Certification, an applicant must demonstrate
    evidence of student achievement, which must
    include student progress. 
  • Student achievement CRCT data are required for
    applicants in
  • Grades 2-8 Self-Contained and Departmentalized
    Core Curricular subject areas
  • Specialty groups in some situations EIP, Gifted,
    Co-teaching

25
Student Achievement Data - Teacher Provides
Roster,State Provides Data
  • To be of optimal assistance to our teacher
    applicants, the DOE staff will provide
    appropriate student achievement data from state
    assessment files. 
  • In order to link student assessment data to the
    teacher who delivered the instruction, it is
    necessary for the applicant to provide a complete
    roster of all students assigned during the
    2007-08 and 2008-09 school years. 
  • Rosters must include the 10-digit GTID number for
    each student listed on the required roster
    template in the application. 
  • Once complete, the Local System Operator will
    upload the roster along with other documents to
    the secure PSC portal. Rosters must be submitted
    electronically using the original Excel
    spreadsheet provided scanned rosters or other
    formats will not be accepted.
  • Note  Individuals completing this template will
    be working with sensitive and
  • confidential student data.  All necessary
    security precautions must be followed.

26
Student Achievement Data State Assessment Data
EvaluationAlignment of Subjects to GPS
  • Between 2005-06 and 2008-09, all Georgia
    Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests were
    aligned to the Georgia Performance Standards
    (GPS) curriculum. Due to this alignment,
    comparison for student progress cannot be made in
    subjects whose tests were aligned in 2008-09.
    This subject is Social Studies for Grades 2-6.
  • For more information regarding evaluation
    components, please see the chart on the next
    slide.

27
Implications of Alignment for Determination of
Achievement and Gain
28
Student Achievement Data CRCTState Assessment
Data EvaluationNeed for Two Consecutive Years
of Same Curriculum based on either QCC or GPS
  • Assessment data will be reviewed for evidence of
    student achievement and gains.
  • If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data
    are available, student achievement gains will be
    evaluated by comparing one years CRCT data to
    previous years CRCT data for each student cohort
    relative to the state data.
  • E.g. applicants 2008-2009 5th grade class showed
    comparative progress over their 4th grade
    performance in 2007-2008 and
  • applicants 2007-2008 5th grade class also showed
    comparative progress over their 4th grade
    performance in 2006-2007.
  • If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data
    are not available for one of the student cohorts,
    then the evaluation for that cohort will be based
    solely on the most recent years achievement
    component.
  • If an applicant teaches multiple subjects or
    grade levels, data will be gathered and evaluated
    from all subjects or the preparation selected.

29
Student Achievement Data State Assessment Data
EvaluationSecond Look
  • Because the Criterion Referenced Competency Tests
    (CRCT) do not provide vertically aligned scores
    from grade level to grade level, the evaluation
    criteria have been developed to allow for the
    evaluation of CRCT scale scores from one grade to
    the next. The student cohorts mean scale score
    in year 2 will be compared to the mean scale
    score in year 1 in standard scores (z-scores).
  • Second Looks are provided in both achievement and
    progress criteria.
  • If an applicant does not qualify during the
    initial review of ACHIEVEMENT data, then an
    additional opportunity is provided to meet a
    rigorous PROGRESS requirement. This SECOND LOOK
    will allow teachers who are assigned the most
    challenging students an opportunity to
    demonstrate that they helped students make gains.
  • Similarly, if an applicant does not qualify
    during the initial review of PROGRESS data, then
    an additional opportunity is provided to meet a
    rigorous ACHIEVEMENT requirement. This second
    look will allow teachers who are assigned the
    highest performing students an opportunity to
    demonstrate that they have helped students make
    appreciable gains in the year they taught the
    cohort.

30
(No Transcript)
31
The Decision Process for Determining If Applicant
Meets Student Achievement and Gains Requirements
32
The Decision Process for Determining If Applicant
Meets Student Achievement and Gains Requirements
- continued
33
CRCT State and System Mean Scale Scores
Meets and Exceeds Data
  • The State needs both system and state data to
    determine the comparative achievement and
    progress made by applicants student cohort
  • State level CRCT mean scale scores
  • Percent meet and exceed for school, system
    state
  • DOE will provide the state, system and school
    level data
  • Applicant is responsible for completing the
    student roster.

34
Wrap upCRCT Student Achievementand Progress
  • Key Points
  • Student assessment data must show evidence of
  • student achievement and progress.
  • Roster Submission Reminders and Tips
  • Verify that the student GTID numbers submitted
    are accurate.
  • Verify that all GTID numbers are filled in.
  • Verify that the grade level submitted is the
    correct grade level for that student in that
    school year.
  • Verify that students are sorted by subject and by
    grade level (see sample).
  • Verify that the school name entered is the
    correct school for the applicant for that school
    year.

35
Samples of Bad and Good Rosters
36
Any Questions On CRCT APPLICATION FORMAT?

37
Monitoring Student Progress(Non-CRCT
Application)
38
Monitoring Student Progress (MSP)(Non-CRCT
Application)
  • - 1 ½ years of student data 2008-2009 school
    year
  • and first semester of 2009-2010
  • - Learning gains based on comprehensive
  • Pre-Test to Post-Test comparison
  • - A focus on the alignment of assessments to
  • clearly identified standards
  • - Use of formative benchmark assessment
    results to
  • modify instruction and improve student
    learning

39
(No Transcript)
40
Required Information on MSP Roster
  • Learning Standards to which pre/post tests are
    aligned (state and/or national, e.g. GPS)
  • Subject area AND grade level for each roster
    (note the school year at the top of each roster)
  • Roster Directions
  • List all students by entering a teacher-created
    student I.D.
  • (no actual student names)
  • For each student enter the pre-test score,
    formative benchmark assessment scores, and the
    post-test score
  • NOTE Benchmark scores that are NOT quantitative
    (checks, stars, letters, etc.) must be included
    along with an explanation
  • Kindergarten application has a specialized roster
    for GKIDS data
  • Assess all content standards and all elements in
    each standard at pre-test and post-test if
    behavior is absent, indicate not demonstrated
  • GKIDS reports are cumulative, thus make sure to
    save reports from each assessment during the year
    to avoid previous reports being overwritten.

41
GKIDS New Monitoring Student Progress Roster
42
AssessmentsStudent Progress
  • Provide ONE COPY of the following documents for
    supporting evidence in each subject area that you
    teach
  • a) A BLANK COPY OF THE PRE-TEST FOR EACH SUBJECT
    AREA (Not to exceed 2 pages for Kindergarten
    and 1st grade not to exceed 5 pages for all
    other grade levels)
  • b) Provide ONE SAMPLE of a formative/benchmark
    assessment that that you used with your
    students IN EACH SUBJECT AREA
  • c) A BLANK COPY OF THE POST-TEST IN EACH SUBJECT
    AREA (Not to exceed 2 pages
    for Kindergarten and
    1st grade not to exceed 5 pages for all other
    grade levels)

43
Formative Benchmark Assessments
Start of course/term/year
End of course/term/year
Pre-Assessment Aligned with standards to be
mastered
Post-Assessment Aligned with standards Did they
master the standards?
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 6
2 Formative Benchmark
1 Formative Benchmark
3 Formative Benchmark
Use information to adjust/change plans and
deliver instruction
44
Formative Benchmark Assessments
  • The essence of good instruction lies not in
    presentation of content but in assessing
    student learning and coaching students toward
    better performance.
  • Grant
    Wiggins

45
Formative Benchmark Assessments
  • Definition Regularly scheduled assessments
    throughout the year to measure students progress
    toward mastery of standards and provide teachers
    with information about how to adjust instruction
    to improve the learning
  • Based on identified learning standards
  • On-going checkpoints to measure the progress
    students should make toward mastery of the
    standards by the end of the term/year/course.
    Where should students be at different intervals
    in acquiring knowledge and skills in standards?
  • Representative of the content and rigor students
    are expected to master
  • QUESTION What are you doing between the
    benchmarks to adjust/change plans and deliver
    instruction based on evidence of student progress?

46
Examples of Formative Benchmark Assessments
  • Performance Tasks embedded within units
  • Unit Culminating Performance Assessments
  • System benchmark assessments
  • School-scheduled benchmarks by grade level and
    subject/course
  • Teacher-created assessments
  • Commercial assessments, if aligned to identified
    standards

47
Formative Benchmark Assessments
  • How do you use the information from your
    on-going, formative assessments to modify or
    adapt teaching strategies, materials and
    approaches to improve student learning?
  • Its not about giving the assessments its
    about doing something about the results.

  • Doug Reeves

48
Formative BenchmarkAssessments and Student
Performance Templates Examples of Questions
  • How did you use the assessment results to adjust
    and deliver instruction for whole groups, small
    groups, sub-groups, and individuals?
  • Explain what you learned about a selected
    students instructional needs from the results of
    the assessments and how you addressed his/her
    needs.

49
Non-CRCT Specialty Groups
  • Special Education, EIP,
  • ESOL, Gifted

50
Specialty Groups with subgroups
  • EIP
  • - Augmented (Kindergarten and First Grade)
  • - Other (Pull-Out, Reading Recovery,
    Self-Contained and Reduced Class Size)
  • ESOL
  • - Self-Contained, Pull-Out
  • Gifted
  • - Resource K-12, Clustering, Advanced Content
  • Special Education
  • - Collaboration, Co-Teaching, Alternative
    Placement
  • NOTE Some teachers in specialty groups may be
    able to apply using either CRCT or non-CRCT
    format. Please call Master Teacher staff if you
    have questions.

51
Specialty Groups
Choose the appropriate level (elementary, middle
or high school) Select appropriate grade level,
delivery model or setting Example EIP
Kindergarten/Augmented Example ESOL Grades
2-5/Core Curricular Example Gifted Resource
K-12 Complete the required forms and templates
52
  • Instructional Coach
  • Application

53
Instructional CoachApplication
  • Two premises
  • Improving the professional practices of teachers
    can positively impact student achievement.
  • Coaching is a professional learning strategy and
    its impact on student learning can be assessed.
  • Application requirements include
  • analyzing student performance data to determine
    the desired professional practices of teachers
    needed to improve performance
  • coaching teachers to develop the targeted
    practices
  • monitoring improvement in the implementation of
    the professional practices
  • evaluating the impact of coaching on student
    learning

54
Review of Non-CRCT and Instructional
CoachApplicationsState Review Team
  • All Monitoring Student Progress (non-CRCT and
    Instructional Coach applications are reviewed and
    evaluated by at least three members of a State
    Review Team.
  • State Review Team members are trained in the
    application process and requirements.

55
  • School System Information

56
School SystemAccess to Resources
  • Go to www.gamasterteachers.org
  • Click on School Systems to access Local System
    Management Plan
  • which includes
  • Local System Coordinator Checklist for Accepting
    Submissions from Applicants
  • Local System Review Team Guidelines
  • Document Submission Guidelines and Checklist
  • System Operator - Electronic Data Submission
    Process
  • Professional Responsibilities Evidence Guide
  • Application Verification form
  • Support Tools (Critical Vocabulary, Redelivery
    PowerPoint, Letters, etc.)

57
Local System Management Plan
  • 1. Superintendent appoints a Local System
    Coordinator (LSC)
  • 2. LSC establishes a local system management
    plan and oversees the plan
  • Appoints a system review team to assist in the
    development and oversight of the plan
  • Establishes due dates for each level of
    application/applicant screening
  • Identifies a system operator to coordinate the
    electronic submission of application
  • 3. Leadership and teachers are informed of the
    application criteria and process
  • Leadership orientation
  • Teacher orientation
  • Distribution of printed information
  • 4. Review process is in place
  • Local school review verifies that data submitted
    are accurate and that the professional practices
    can be supported with documentation.
  • System level review verifies the local school
    recommendation to submit or not submit the
    application to PSC.

58
Local System ManagementPlan.continued
  • ALL APPLICATIONS MUST HAVE THE SIGNATURES OF THE
    SUPERINTENDENT, APPLICANTS PRINCIPAL, AND TWO
    OTHER REVIEWERS
  • Superintendent (or designee) must sign the
    verification document
  • Applicants Principal must sign the verification
    document
  • In addition to the Superintendent and the
    Principal, two other reviewers could be
  • Other Review Committee Members
  • District Level Directors from Human Resources,
    Professional Learning, Curriculum and
    Instruction, etc.
  • Applicants Assistant Principal
  • Schools Lead Teachers or Department Heads
  • Any other personnel who would be able to verify
    the applicants teaching practices, professional
    responsibilities practices, teaching credentials,
    and complete and accurate application
  • Note If application is a Special Education
    category, the Special Education Supervisor or
    Director must be one of the signatories.

59
Application Verification Form Place a check ( ? )
in the appropriate column each item must be
Yes or N/A to be submitted. All four
signatures must be included. PSC is no longer
able to contact Local Systems regarding missing
signatures or checks.
  • Application
  • Verification
  • Page 1

60
Application Verification Page 2
61
Possible Problems in theApplication Process
  • Incorrect information (school, year, and/or
    grade) was entered
  • Incorrect ID numbers - must submit 10-digit
    Georgia Test Identification (GTID) number
  • Missing student ID s for some students listed
  • Applicant does not sort roster by subject and
    grade
  • Scanned or faxed student rosters
  • Applicants name and the name for submitted
    documents do not match (Applicants data
    submitted under wrong name)
  • Application is submitted under wrong category
    (CRCT, non-CRCT, or Instructional Coach)
  • File names are incorrect
  • Files are uploaded by operator to wrong section
  • Directions are misread or not followed

62
Critical Dates for 2010 Master Teacher
Application
  • OPENS
  • September 21, 2009
  • CLOSES (System Deadlines for Submission)
  • December 15, 2009 for CRCT
  • January 31, 2010 for Non-CRCT and Instructional
    Coach

63
Local Timelines
  • School Systems complete as needed
  • CRCT applications due_____
  • Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT) and
    Instructional Coach applications due_______

64
Validity of Certificate
  • Six (6) years
  • 2006 Master Teachers will renew in 2011-12 school
    year
  • 2007 Master Teachers will renew in 2012-2013
    school year
  • 2008 Master Teachers will renew in 2013-2014
    school year
  • 2009 Master Teachers will renew in 2014-2015
    school year
  • Renewal will be based on continued evidence of a
    positive impact on student achievement

65
  • Electronic Data
  • Submission Process
  • for Local System Operators

66
Electronic Submission Process
  • APPLICATION All supporting documents are
    submitted electronically by the Local School
    System Operator. Faxed applications and
    documents are NOT ACCEPTED.
  • STUDENT ROSTER(S) Submitted electronically on
    the template provided (scanned and faxed rosters
    are NOT ACCEPTED)
  • SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS - some can be scanned and
    saved to a file Access the Document Submission
    Guidelines and Checklist 2010 for
  • - Complete list of documents to be submitted
  • - File names for each document submitted

67
Designate a System Operator
  • System operators will use the Master Teacher
    Data Manager
  • (MTDM) on the PSCs portal, www.gapsc.org
  • Most systems already have someone authorized to
    use
  • MTDM
  • Register new operators by sending email to
  • support_at_gapsc.com and provide the following
    information
  • about the operator
  • Full name
  • School system
  • Email address
  • Phone number

68
Get Ready
  • Obtain and prepare application materials before
    accessing www.gapsc.org
  • Gather paper and electronic documents from
    applicants.
  • Applicants have provided you with a list of
    documents that are to be
  • included with the limitations placed on the
    number of pages per document
  • as appropriate.
  • Access www.gamasterteachers.org/SchoolSystem - a
    complete list of file
  • names for all application categories can be
    found in Document
  • Submission Guidelines and Checklist.
  • Expect to have many electronic documents from
    each applicant
  • Be sure paper documents are complete check for
    all required
  • signatures!
  • Scan paper documents to generate electronic
    documents in PDF or TIF format.
  • You should have one electronic document per
    paper document.

69
Log in
  • System operator logs onto www.gapsc.org and
    clicks the MTDM button

70
Master Teacher Data Manager (MTDM)
  • Record lookup
  • History
  • Status
  • Application creation and editing

71
Record Lookup Find a Teacher
  • Enter SSN or Certification ID
  • Click the Search button

72
Update Personal Information
  • Check the applicant's address and update it!
  • Add the applicants email address located on the
    applicants Personal Information form
  • Click Save changes

73
Application Questions
  • Provide the requested data from the applicants
    application
  • Click the Continue button to proceed
  • Click Quit to stop and resume later

74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
1 Click to browse your drives and find the file
to upload
2 After selecting your file, click here to
upload
78
1 Click to your drives and find the file to
upload
2 After selecting your file, click here to
upload
3 After uploading file, check to be sure that
the filename submitted is uploaded, then click
on continue
79
(No Transcript)
80
Summary Screen CHECK FOR ACCURACY The SUBMIT
button on the MTDM portal for the following
teacher must be clicked in order to finish
submitting. The application will go forward to
the PSC as soon as that operation is completed. 
81
Electronic Upload Errors
  • SUBMISSION ERRORS Application with submission
    errors will be placed in the category CANNOT
    PROCESS. PSC staff will no longer be able to
    contact systems/teachers to correct information.
    Errors include wrong rosters, incorrect student
    ID numbers, and scanned documents that should
    have been transmitted in the provided format
    through the portal, etc.
  • TO AVOID ERRORS, BE SURE TO CHECK THAT
  • Supporting documents submitted are uploaded to
    the correct applicants file and to the correct
    section
  • Data submitted match the school, grade, and
    school year
  • Student identification number (the GTID 10-digit
    number used for GA DOE reporting) is provided for
    the correct school, grade, and school year of
    data (CRCT format only)

82
Closing Remarks
  • Recognition for Georgias public school teachers
  • Collaborative effort by
  • PSC
  • DOE
  • Governors Office of Student Achievement
  • Governors Office
  • Legislature
  • The Public
  • Thank you for your interest and your comments!!!

83
Information Access
  • Website www.gamasterteachers.org
  • Email masterteachers_at_gapsc.com

84
Contact Information
  • For questions and information
  • ginny.elliott_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2601
  • winifred.nweke_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2602
  • tom.higgins_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2603
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com