Title: Master Teacher Certification Redelivery Training
1Master Teacher CertificationRedelivery Training
-
- Presenters Ginny Elliott
- Winifred Nweke
- Tom Higgins
2- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- The Legislation and Purpose of the Program
(Slides 3-7) - Benefits for the School, School System and the
Teacher (Slides 8-9) - Application process for Master Teacher 2009
(Slides 10-22) - Two Application Formats - 3 categories (Slide 22)
- CRCT Application Format (Slides 23-36)
- Monitoring Student Progress Application
(Non-CRCT) Format (Slides 37-48) - Specialty Groups - Special Ed, EIP, ESOL, Gifted,
Instructional Coach (Slides 49-54) - Local School System Information (Slides 55-64)
- Process for Electronic Submission of Application
to PSC by Local System Operator (Slides 65-81) - Closing Remarks and Contact Information (Slides
82-84)
3The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
- The Professional Standards Commission (PSC) is
authorized and directed to - Establish a Georgia Master Teacher Program
- to be recognition for teachers excellence in
the classroom through student achievement and
student progress
4The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
- Establish criteria to include, at a minimum
- - Evidence of student achievement and student
progress - - Georgia Public School Teacher
- - Minimum of 3 years of experience on Georgia
Clear Renewable certificate
5The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
- Professional Standards Commission
- Reviews each application and determines whether
the applicant meets the criteria. - Develops Master Teacher rules and regulations to
govern the program. - Develops the structure to support the
certification and the recognition.
6- The Law Georgia Code 20-2-205
- Master Teacher designation is valid according to
PSC rule/regulations - Master Teacher Certificate is valid for six
years. - Criteria for certification renewal will be
available in the 2010-2011 school year (the first
year of renewal)
7- Master Teacher Certification reflects
- DOE Georgia Performance Standards (GPS)
- Georgia Framework for Teaching
8Why should systems support the Master Teacher
Certification Program?
- Identifies teachers who are having an impact on
student achievement and progress as measured by
the CRCT and other assessments - Can lead to identifying sharing best practices
among teachers - Recognizes additional teachers who have the
potential to become leaders, mentors, coaches
for other teachers and thus, may contribute to
teacher retention
9Why should teachers want to become Master
Teachers?
- Recognizes teachers for their impact on student
achievement and progress - Provides teachers feedback that may not be
available from other sources - Gives an opportunity for professional growth
through sharing, serving, and learning
10 11Check eligibility
- Full-time Georgia public school teacher
- 3 Years successful experience in Georgia
- Held a Georgia Clear-Renewable Certificate for at
least 3 full years
12Access the web site
- www.gamasterteachers.org
- Click on About
- Carefully read the opening page information
- Click on Apply and select the appropriate
school level Elementary, Middle, High School - Refer to Support Tools as necessary
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18Select the AppropriateGrade Level Option
- The Grade Level Option selected will contain
EVERYTHING you need for applying - Personal Information page
- Supporting Documents
- All directions, templates, and links needed to
submit the rosters and/or explanation templates - Evidence of Professional Responsibilities form
- Application Verification form
- A list of documents to be submitted and the file
name for each document as required in the grade
level and/or subject area
19Review Professional Responsibilities
- Applicant reviews the Evidence of Professional
Responsibilities form - Applicant discusses the Professional
Responsibilities with the Principal - 3. After review, Principal signs Application
Verification form and submits application file
electronically to the Local System Coordinator
(LSC)
20Professional Responsibilities
- The teacher must meet the following professional
practices. The signatures on the Application
Verification form will confirm the teachers
implementation of these practices. - The teacher
- Participates in opportunities for Professional
Learning reflecting personal goals that align
with school improvement goals and Georgia
Performance Standards (GPS) - Implements exemplary practices that connect to
student learning and achievement - Demonstrates a collaborative and supportive
relationship with colleagues - Provides frequent information to parents, as
appropriate, about the instructional program - Provides information regarding student progress
to parents - Responds to parent concerns with appropriate
professionalism - Develops a classroom management system which is
easily understood by the students and encourages
students to self-monitor - Exhibits appropriate communication with
administrators - Maintains strict adherence to confidentiality
- Models standards of professional conduct to others
21Support Tools
- - Critical Vocabulary
- - Chart for Non-Consecutive Years in the same
kind - of data
- - Redelivery PowerPoint
- - Directions for Grades 2-5 Departmentalized
CRCT - and Non-CRCT
-
22Application Formats
- 1. CRCT-Tested Grade Levels and Subject Areas
- (Grades 2-8)
- 2. Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT)
- Kindergarten
- 1st Grade (No comparison from kindergarten)
- Grades 9-12
- Non-Core Curricular Subject Areas (Writing, Art,
Music, P.E., Business, Technology, etc.) - Specialty Groups (e.g. EIP, ESOL, Special
Education, Gifted in most cases) - 3. Instructional Coach
- NOTE Co-teaching in special education may be
CRCT or non-CRCT format. Please call Master
Teacher office if there are any questions.
23- CRCT Application
- State Assessment Data
- Guidelines and Evaluation
24Student Achievement Data - State Assessment Data
Guidelines
- To be considered for Master Teacher
Certification, an applicant must demonstrate
evidence of student achievement, which must
include student progress. - Student achievement CRCT data are required for
applicants in - Grades 2-8 Self-Contained and Departmentalized
Core Curricular subject areas - Specialty groups in some situations EIP, Gifted,
Co-teaching
25Student Achievement Data - Teacher Provides
Roster,State Provides Data
- To be of optimal assistance to our teacher
applicants, the DOE staff will provide
appropriate student achievement data from state
assessment files. - In order to link student assessment data to the
teacher who delivered the instruction, it is
necessary for the applicant to provide a complete
roster of all students assigned during the
2007-08 and 2008-09 school years. - Rosters must include the 10-digit GTID number for
each student listed on the required roster
template in the application. - Once complete, the Local System Operator will
upload the roster along with other documents to
the secure PSC portal. Rosters must be submitted
electronically using the original Excel
spreadsheet provided scanned rosters or other
formats will not be accepted. - Note Individuals completing this template will
be working with sensitive and - confidential student data. All necessary
security precautions must be followed.
26Student Achievement Data State Assessment Data
EvaluationAlignment of Subjects to GPS
- Between 2005-06 and 2008-09, all Georgia
Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests were
aligned to the Georgia Performance Standards
(GPS) curriculum. Due to this alignment,
comparison for student progress cannot be made in
subjects whose tests were aligned in 2008-09.
This subject is Social Studies for Grades 2-6. - For more information regarding evaluation
components, please see the chart on the next
slide.
27Implications of Alignment for Determination of
Achievement and Gain
28Student Achievement Data CRCTState Assessment
Data EvaluationNeed for Two Consecutive Years
of Same Curriculum based on either QCC or GPS
- Assessment data will be reviewed for evidence of
student achievement and gains. - If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data
are available, student achievement gains will be
evaluated by comparing one years CRCT data to
previous years CRCT data for each student cohort
relative to the state data. - E.g. applicants 2008-2009 5th grade class showed
comparative progress over their 4th grade
performance in 2007-2008 and - applicants 2007-2008 5th grade class also showed
comparative progress over their 4th grade
performance in 2006-2007. - If two consecutive years of comparable CRCT data
are not available for one of the student cohorts,
then the evaluation for that cohort will be based
solely on the most recent years achievement
component. - If an applicant teaches multiple subjects or
grade levels, data will be gathered and evaluated
from all subjects or the preparation selected.
29Student Achievement Data State Assessment Data
EvaluationSecond Look
- Because the Criterion Referenced Competency Tests
(CRCT) do not provide vertically aligned scores
from grade level to grade level, the evaluation
criteria have been developed to allow for the
evaluation of CRCT scale scores from one grade to
the next. The student cohorts mean scale score
in year 2 will be compared to the mean scale
score in year 1 in standard scores (z-scores). - Second Looks are provided in both achievement and
progress criteria. - If an applicant does not qualify during the
initial review of ACHIEVEMENT data, then an
additional opportunity is provided to meet a
rigorous PROGRESS requirement. This SECOND LOOK
will allow teachers who are assigned the most
challenging students an opportunity to
demonstrate that they helped students make gains. - Similarly, if an applicant does not qualify
during the initial review of PROGRESS data, then
an additional opportunity is provided to meet a
rigorous ACHIEVEMENT requirement. This second
look will allow teachers who are assigned the
highest performing students an opportunity to
demonstrate that they have helped students make
appreciable gains in the year they taught the
cohort.
30(No Transcript)
31The Decision Process for Determining If Applicant
Meets Student Achievement and Gains Requirements
32The Decision Process for Determining If Applicant
Meets Student Achievement and Gains Requirements
- continued
33CRCT State and System Mean Scale Scores
Meets and Exceeds Data
- The State needs both system and state data to
determine the comparative achievement and
progress made by applicants student cohort - State level CRCT mean scale scores
- Percent meet and exceed for school, system
state - DOE will provide the state, system and school
level data - Applicant is responsible for completing the
student roster.
34Wrap upCRCT Student Achievementand Progress
- Key Points
- Student assessment data must show evidence of
- student achievement and progress.
- Roster Submission Reminders and Tips
- Verify that the student GTID numbers submitted
are accurate. - Verify that all GTID numbers are filled in.
- Verify that the grade level submitted is the
correct grade level for that student in that
school year. - Verify that students are sorted by subject and by
grade level (see sample). - Verify that the school name entered is the
correct school for the applicant for that school
year.
35Samples of Bad and Good Rosters
36Any Questions On CRCT APPLICATION FORMAT?
37Monitoring Student Progress(Non-CRCT
Application)
38Monitoring Student Progress (MSP)(Non-CRCT
Application)
- - 1 ½ years of student data 2008-2009 school
year - and first semester of 2009-2010
- - Learning gains based on comprehensive
- Pre-Test to Post-Test comparison
- - A focus on the alignment of assessments to
- clearly identified standards
- - Use of formative benchmark assessment
results to - modify instruction and improve student
learning
39(No Transcript)
40Required Information on MSP Roster
- Learning Standards to which pre/post tests are
aligned (state and/or national, e.g. GPS) - Subject area AND grade level for each roster
(note the school year at the top of each roster) - Roster Directions
- List all students by entering a teacher-created
student I.D. - (no actual student names)
- For each student enter the pre-test score,
formative benchmark assessment scores, and the
post-test score - NOTE Benchmark scores that are NOT quantitative
(checks, stars, letters, etc.) must be included
along with an explanation - Kindergarten application has a specialized roster
for GKIDS data - Assess all content standards and all elements in
each standard at pre-test and post-test if
behavior is absent, indicate not demonstrated - GKIDS reports are cumulative, thus make sure to
save reports from each assessment during the year
to avoid previous reports being overwritten.
41GKIDS New Monitoring Student Progress Roster
42AssessmentsStudent Progress
- Provide ONE COPY of the following documents for
supporting evidence in each subject area that you
teach - a) A BLANK COPY OF THE PRE-TEST FOR EACH SUBJECT
AREA (Not to exceed 2 pages for Kindergarten
and 1st grade not to exceed 5 pages for all
other grade levels) - b) Provide ONE SAMPLE of a formative/benchmark
assessment that that you used with your
students IN EACH SUBJECT AREA -
- c) A BLANK COPY OF THE POST-TEST IN EACH SUBJECT
AREA (Not to exceed 2 pages
for Kindergarten and
1st grade not to exceed 5 pages for all other
grade levels)
43Formative Benchmark Assessments
Start of course/term/year
End of course/term/year
Pre-Assessment Aligned with standards to be
mastered
Post-Assessment Aligned with standards Did they
master the standards?
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 6
2 Formative Benchmark
1 Formative Benchmark
3 Formative Benchmark
Use information to adjust/change plans and
deliver instruction
44Formative Benchmark Assessments
- The essence of good instruction lies not in
presentation of content but in assessing
student learning and coaching students toward
better performance. - Grant
Wiggins
45Formative Benchmark Assessments
- Definition Regularly scheduled assessments
throughout the year to measure students progress
toward mastery of standards and provide teachers
with information about how to adjust instruction
to improve the learning - Based on identified learning standards
- On-going checkpoints to measure the progress
students should make toward mastery of the
standards by the end of the term/year/course.
Where should students be at different intervals
in acquiring knowledge and skills in standards? - Representative of the content and rigor students
are expected to master - QUESTION What are you doing between the
benchmarks to adjust/change plans and deliver
instruction based on evidence of student progress?
46Examples of Formative Benchmark Assessments
- Performance Tasks embedded within units
- Unit Culminating Performance Assessments
- System benchmark assessments
- School-scheduled benchmarks by grade level and
subject/course - Teacher-created assessments
- Commercial assessments, if aligned to identified
standards
47Formative Benchmark Assessments
- How do you use the information from your
on-going, formative assessments to modify or
adapt teaching strategies, materials and
approaches to improve student learning? - Its not about giving the assessments its
about doing something about the results. -
Doug Reeves
48Formative BenchmarkAssessments and Student
Performance Templates Examples of Questions
- How did you use the assessment results to adjust
and deliver instruction for whole groups, small
groups, sub-groups, and individuals? - Explain what you learned about a selected
students instructional needs from the results of
the assessments and how you addressed his/her
needs.
49Non-CRCT Specialty Groups
- Special Education, EIP,
- ESOL, Gifted
50Specialty Groups with subgroups
- EIP
- - Augmented (Kindergarten and First Grade)
- - Other (Pull-Out, Reading Recovery,
Self-Contained and Reduced Class Size) - ESOL
- - Self-Contained, Pull-Out
- Gifted
- - Resource K-12, Clustering, Advanced Content
- Special Education
- - Collaboration, Co-Teaching, Alternative
Placement - NOTE Some teachers in specialty groups may be
able to apply using either CRCT or non-CRCT
format. Please call Master Teacher staff if you
have questions.
51Specialty Groups
Choose the appropriate level (elementary, middle
or high school) Select appropriate grade level,
delivery model or setting Example EIP
Kindergarten/Augmented Example ESOL Grades
2-5/Core Curricular Example Gifted Resource
K-12 Complete the required forms and templates
52- Instructional Coach
- Application
53Instructional CoachApplication
- Two premises
- Improving the professional practices of teachers
can positively impact student achievement. - Coaching is a professional learning strategy and
its impact on student learning can be assessed. - Application requirements include
- analyzing student performance data to determine
the desired professional practices of teachers
needed to improve performance - coaching teachers to develop the targeted
practices - monitoring improvement in the implementation of
the professional practices - evaluating the impact of coaching on student
learning
54Review of Non-CRCT and Instructional
CoachApplicationsState Review Team
- All Monitoring Student Progress (non-CRCT and
Instructional Coach applications are reviewed and
evaluated by at least three members of a State
Review Team. - State Review Team members are trained in the
application process and requirements.
55- School System Information
56School SystemAccess to Resources
- Go to www.gamasterteachers.org
- Click on School Systems to access Local System
Management Plan - which includes
- Local System Coordinator Checklist for Accepting
Submissions from Applicants - Local System Review Team Guidelines
- Document Submission Guidelines and Checklist
- System Operator - Electronic Data Submission
Process - Professional Responsibilities Evidence Guide
- Application Verification form
- Support Tools (Critical Vocabulary, Redelivery
PowerPoint, Letters, etc.)
57Local System Management Plan
- 1. Superintendent appoints a Local System
Coordinator (LSC) - 2. LSC establishes a local system management
plan and oversees the plan - Appoints a system review team to assist in the
development and oversight of the plan - Establishes due dates for each level of
application/applicant screening - Identifies a system operator to coordinate the
electronic submission of application - 3. Leadership and teachers are informed of the
application criteria and process - Leadership orientation
- Teacher orientation
- Distribution of printed information
- 4. Review process is in place
- Local school review verifies that data submitted
are accurate and that the professional practices
can be supported with documentation. - System level review verifies the local school
recommendation to submit or not submit the
application to PSC. -
58Local System ManagementPlan.continued
- ALL APPLICATIONS MUST HAVE THE SIGNATURES OF THE
SUPERINTENDENT, APPLICANTS PRINCIPAL, AND TWO
OTHER REVIEWERS - Superintendent (or designee) must sign the
verification document - Applicants Principal must sign the verification
document - In addition to the Superintendent and the
Principal, two other reviewers could be - Other Review Committee Members
- District Level Directors from Human Resources,
Professional Learning, Curriculum and
Instruction, etc. - Applicants Assistant Principal
- Schools Lead Teachers or Department Heads
- Any other personnel who would be able to verify
the applicants teaching practices, professional
responsibilities practices, teaching credentials,
and complete and accurate application - Note If application is a Special Education
category, the Special Education Supervisor or
Director must be one of the signatories.
59Application Verification Form Place a check ( ? )
in the appropriate column each item must be
Yes or N/A to be submitted. All four
signatures must be included. PSC is no longer
able to contact Local Systems regarding missing
signatures or checks.
- Application
- Verification
- Page 1
60Application Verification Page 2
61Possible Problems in theApplication Process
- Incorrect information (school, year, and/or
grade) was entered - Incorrect ID numbers - must submit 10-digit
Georgia Test Identification (GTID) number - Missing student ID s for some students listed
- Applicant does not sort roster by subject and
grade - Scanned or faxed student rosters
- Applicants name and the name for submitted
documents do not match (Applicants data
submitted under wrong name) - Application is submitted under wrong category
(CRCT, non-CRCT, or Instructional Coach) - File names are incorrect
- Files are uploaded by operator to wrong section
- Directions are misread or not followed
62Critical Dates for 2010 Master Teacher
Application
- OPENS
- September 21, 2009
- CLOSES (System Deadlines for Submission)
- December 15, 2009 for CRCT
- January 31, 2010 for Non-CRCT and Instructional
Coach
63Local Timelines
- School Systems complete as needed
- CRCT applications due_____
- Monitoring Student Progress (Non-CRCT) and
Instructional Coach applications due_______
64Validity of Certificate
- Six (6) years
- 2006 Master Teachers will renew in 2011-12 school
year - 2007 Master Teachers will renew in 2012-2013
school year - 2008 Master Teachers will renew in 2013-2014
school year - 2009 Master Teachers will renew in 2014-2015
school year - Renewal will be based on continued evidence of a
positive impact on student achievement
65- Electronic Data
- Submission Process
- for Local System Operators
66Electronic Submission Process
- APPLICATION All supporting documents are
submitted electronically by the Local School
System Operator. Faxed applications and
documents are NOT ACCEPTED. - STUDENT ROSTER(S) Submitted electronically on
the template provided (scanned and faxed rosters
are NOT ACCEPTED) - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS - some can be scanned and
saved to a file Access the Document Submission
Guidelines and Checklist 2010 for - - Complete list of documents to be submitted
- - File names for each document submitted
67 Designate a System Operator
- System operators will use the Master Teacher
Data Manager - (MTDM) on the PSCs portal, www.gapsc.org
- Most systems already have someone authorized to
use - MTDM
- Register new operators by sending email to
- support_at_gapsc.com and provide the following
information - about the operator
- Full name
- School system
- Email address
- Phone number
68Get Ready
- Obtain and prepare application materials before
accessing www.gapsc.org - Gather paper and electronic documents from
applicants. - Applicants have provided you with a list of
documents that are to be - included with the limitations placed on the
number of pages per document - as appropriate.
- Access www.gamasterteachers.org/SchoolSystem - a
complete list of file - names for all application categories can be
found in Document - Submission Guidelines and Checklist.
- Expect to have many electronic documents from
each applicant - Be sure paper documents are complete check for
all required - signatures!
- Scan paper documents to generate electronic
documents in PDF or TIF format. - You should have one electronic document per
paper document.
69Log in
- System operator logs onto www.gapsc.org and
clicks the MTDM button
70Master Teacher Data Manager (MTDM)
- Record lookup
- History
- Status
- Application creation and editing
71Record Lookup Find a Teacher
- Enter SSN or Certification ID
- Click the Search button
72Update Personal Information
- Check the applicant's address and update it!
- Add the applicants email address located on the
applicants Personal Information form - Click Save changes
73Application Questions
- Provide the requested data from the applicants
application - Click the Continue button to proceed
- Click Quit to stop and resume later
74(No Transcript)
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
771 Click to browse your drives and find the file
to upload
2 After selecting your file, click here to
upload
781 Click to your drives and find the file to
upload
2 After selecting your file, click here to
upload
3 After uploading file, check to be sure that
the filename submitted is uploaded, then click
on continue
79(No Transcript)
80Summary Screen CHECK FOR ACCURACY The SUBMIT
button on the MTDM portal for the following
teacher must be clicked in order to finish
submitting. The application will go forward to
the PSC as soon as that operation is completed.
81Electronic Upload Errors
- SUBMISSION ERRORS Application with submission
errors will be placed in the category CANNOT
PROCESS. PSC staff will no longer be able to
contact systems/teachers to correct information.
Errors include wrong rosters, incorrect student
ID numbers, and scanned documents that should
have been transmitted in the provided format
through the portal, etc. - TO AVOID ERRORS, BE SURE TO CHECK THAT
- Supporting documents submitted are uploaded to
the correct applicants file and to the correct
section - Data submitted match the school, grade, and
school year - Student identification number (the GTID 10-digit
number used for GA DOE reporting) is provided for
the correct school, grade, and school year of
data (CRCT format only)
82Closing Remarks
- Recognition for Georgias public school teachers
- Collaborative effort by
- PSC
- DOE
- Governors Office of Student Achievement
- Governors Office
- Legislature
- The Public
- Thank you for your interest and your comments!!!
83Information Access
- Website www.gamasterteachers.org
- Email masterteachers_at_gapsc.com
84Contact Information
- For questions and information
- ginny.elliott_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2601
- winifred.nweke_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2602
- tom.higgins_at_gapsc.com 404-232-2603