Title: Pension schemes
1Employer retirement pension schemes
Reimund Mink and Richard Walton
Luxembourg, 7 and 8 July 2005
Paper prepared for the meeting of the CMFB
2Employer retirement pension schemes
- Current position in the 1993 SNA and in
related manuals - Reasons for changing the 1993 SNA
- Evaluation of the proposed alternative
solutions - Recording of unfunded pension obligations as
liabilities in the core accounts - Recording of unfunded pension obligations in a
set of supplementary accounts - Preferred recommended solution
- Implications for the System
3Employer retirement pension schemes
- Current position in the 1993 SNA and in
related manuals - 1993 SNA does not recognise unfunded
obligations as liabilities of employer
pension schemes and as financial assets of
beneficiaries however, it proposes to show the
net present value of assets and liabilities as
memorandum items - 1995 ESA like 1993 SNA it further proposes to
only include provisions if they are calculated
according to actuarial criteria similar to those
used by insurance - GFSM 2001 recommends to record government
unfunded obligations as liabilities
4Employer retirement pension schemes
- Reasons for changing the 1993 SNA
- Mainly three reasons
- Unfunded employer schemes are particularly
significant for government. In the light of
ageing populations, there is a well-founded
interest to have more comprehensive statistical
information on future commitments of governments - Different accounting for funded and unfunded
schemes leads to different effects on key
variables like income, net lending/net borrowing,
financial assets or liabilities - Some convergence of international statistical
standards and international accounting standards
(IAS) is aimed at.
5Employer retirement pension schemes
- Evaluation of the proposed alternative
solutions - Two options of the recording of unfunded
pension obligations - As liabilities In a set of
- in the core accounts supplementary accounts
- This is the proposal made This is
the view presented in - by the IMFs EDG on pensions
various papers presented to the - Eurostat Task Force on SNA
-
6Employer retirement pension schemes
- Evaluation of the proposed alternative
solutions - Recording of unfunded pension obligations as
liabilities in the core accounts - Implications
- Unfunded schemes treated as if they were funded
schemes strong assumptions have to be made in
relation to the discount rate, the average life
expectancy of the scheme members, and their final
salaries - Changes in assets and liabilities for pensions
due to various kinds of (imputed) financial
transactions - Changes in assets and liabilities for pensions
due to revisions of the actuarial assumptions
7Employer retirement pension schemes
- Evaluation of the proposed alternative
solutions - Recording of unfunded pension obligations as
liabilities in a set of supplementary accounts - Reasons
- It is arbitrary to treat only the obligations of
unfunded employer pension schemes as liabilities
especially valid for economies with a large
proportion of pensions organised on a
pay-as-you-go basis - Intractable measurement issues arise if no stock
and flow data are available based on actuarial
criteria especially valid for government
accounts - Pay-as-you-go schemes imply different economic
behaviour of employers and employees (households)
than funded schemes - Pay-as-you-go schemes imply different structures
of financial markets than funded schemes
8Employer retirement pension schemes
- Preferred recommended solution
- Recording of stocks and flows related to unfunded
pension schemes operated by governments or other
sectors for their employees and to social
security pension schemes in a set of
supplementary accounts - Same rules are applied as for funded schemes,
but assumptions should be made explicit - A sensitivity analysis should be conducted
- As a result, the current treatment of unfunded
schemes in the core accounts does not change,
while all supplementary model estimates are
recorded in a separate set of (implicit)
transaction accounts, other flow accounts, and
balance sheets.
9Employer retirement pension schemes
- Implications for the System
- As unfunded employer pension schemes and social
security schemes are often close substitutes to
each other, they should be treated in the same
way - As actuarial calculations are often not
available, rather complicated model calculations
would have to be carried out - The supplementary set of accounts could be
extended to other types of implicit assets and
liabilities like loan provisions or one-off
guarantees. - The compilation of a supplementary set of
accounts has the advantage to provide the users
with a consistent and comprehensive set of data,
also useful for financial stability analysis of
corporate and government sectors.
10Employer retirement pension schemes
Does the CMFB agree with the recommended
treatment of (a) Unfunded employer pension
schemes? (b) Social security schemes in a
separate set of supplementary accounts?