Title: Summary Brief for:
1X-CraftTechnology Overview
Captain David Comis ONR Code 33B Jim Webster
ONR Code 33/NAVSEA O5H1
- Summary Brief for
- USNA
- 22 April 2003
2X-Craft Summary
- Purpose
- Experimental platform evaluating the hydrodynamic
performance, structural behavior and propulsion
system efficiency of high speed hull form
technologies - Evaluate mission modularity
- Science Technology
- Hydrodynamic experimentation (experimental data
suite) - Measure fluid flow, motions, dynamic loads,
stresses, and speed/power requirements - Lifting Body
- Designed to accept underwater lifting body(s) for
hydrodynamic experimentation - Drag Reduction
- Advanced polymer active drag reduction system
installed on lifting body
3Technology Insertion
- Lifting Body
- Fluid Drag Reduction/Polymers
- Modular Payloads in Mission Bay
- Modular payloads integrated into C4I
- UAVs/USVs/UUVs Capability
- Reduced Manning/Automation
- CODOG - Gas Turbines/Diesels/Waterjets
4X-Craft Characteristics
- Length/Beam 73 m / 22 m (approx)
- FLD 1100 LT (approx)
- Propulsion (2) Gas Turbine Engines
- (2) Propulsion Diesels (CODOG)
- Propulsor (4) Waterjets (steerable/reversible)
- Speed 50 knots in calm seas in Combat Loading
Condition - 40 knots in Sea State 4
- Range 4000 NM/trans-oceanic range _at_ 20 knots
- C4I (2) COTS surface search radars LAN HF,
VHF, UHF radios - Survivability Operational through S/S 4
survivable through S/S 6 - Mission Bay Support mission packages in ISO
20x8x8 containers - - multi-purpose stern ramp (launch/recover up
to 11m RHIBs) - - side RO/RO ramp (support fully loaded HMMWV)
- Flight Deck Landing spots for (2) SH-60Rs
(day/night VFR) - No maintenance facilities
- Crew 25
- Initial Sea Trials June 2004
5Combat Load Loading Conditions
X-Craft shall achieve speeds of 50 knots (125F
ambient, 104F seawater temp) in the Primary
Combat Loading Condition.
- Primary Combat Load Loading Condition is the
Light Ship Loading Condition plus 150 tons of
payload and adequate fuel and stores to operate
for 5 hours at 50 knots and 5 days at loiter
speed (12 knots) - Secondary Combat Load Loading Condition is the
Light Ship Loading Condition with 150 tons of
payload and adequate fuel and stores required to
perform the following mission - Transit 800 NM _at_ 20 knots
- Operate 4 hours at 50 knots
- Operate on station at loiter speed (12 knots) for
21 days - Transit 800 NM back to port _at_ 20 knots
6Project Overview
- What we are trying to do
- High Speed Technology
- Develop
- Demonstrate
- Transition
- Environment
- Open Ocean
- Littoral
- What are we doing about it
- Getting close empirically
- MDO
- Parametric Models
- Reduce Risk Along the way
- Full Scale Trials
- Graduated Certification
- What we intend to learn
- Loads
- Structures
- Ship Motions
- Ship resistance
- Ship Propulsion
- What is different
- Dynamic Behavior
- Loads
- Temperature
- OPTEMPO
- Certification
7Transition of ST to Next Navy
- Science Technology
- Hydrodynamic experimentation
- Fluid flow
- Motions
- Dynamic Loads
- Speed/power requirements
- Structural Experimentation
- Primary stresses
- Secondary stresses
- Unsteady excitation
- Lifting Body
- Designed to accept underwater lifting body(s) for
hydrodynamic experimentation - Drag Reduction
- Advanced polymer active drag reduction system
installed on lifting body - Design Relevance Stochastically Enabled by
- Sub-Scale Physical Model Tests
- Finite Element Modeling
- Hydronumeric Modeling
8Craft Performance Requirements(Objective
Functions)
- Evaluate high speed technology needed to achieve
- 20-Knot Open Ocean transit
- 40 Knots Sea State 4 Open Ocean
- Survive Open Ocean Sea State 6
- 50 Knots
- Conduct Operations in Theater 125 degrees F
9Design Getting the Right Craft
- Demonstrate High Speed Technologies Needed for
LCS - Materials
- Processes
- Certification ,Classification, Flagging
- Hydrodynamics for High Speed
- Lifting body test platform
- Drag Reduction test platform
- Stern Ramp Launch and Recovery
- Mission Modularity
- Multi-Objective Optimization
- Max Speed
- Endurance range
- Lightship Displacement
10Resistance
11Delivering Power in High Ambient Conditions
- LM2500 Gas Turbine (2)
- MTU 16V595TE92 (2)
- Kamewa 125SII (4)
12Propulsion
13Weight reduction versus intended service
- Regulatory body structural design guidelines
- DNV Open Ocean operation is restricted for high
speed craft - Time from sheltered waters
- Minimal high loadings assumed
- No consideration for fatigue
- No consideration for extreme loads relative to
special material properties relationship
between yield and ultimate - Heat treated materials
- Materials not lending themselves to
non-destructive test inspection - ABS Current rules are similar to DNV
- Direct Loads Analysis
14Open Ocean Environment
- Wet deck impacts are critical loading condition
for design accelerations - Important factors to consider during design
- Clearance between mean waterline and wet deck
- Sea state
- Amplitude
- Period
- Ship Dynamic Response
15Environment
- Regulatory body guidelines
- Linear behavior (small amplitude responses)
- Implicit - seaway restrictions
- Restricted water operation reflects the
peakedness and bandedness of benign
environments - Open ocean-greater spreading of amplitudes and
periods - Littoral environments wave energy concentrated
close to ship dynamics resonant conditions - Achieving reliability in structural design and
ship stability - design process consider probability of occurrence
of overmatching events in the specified
environment
16Performance - Ship Safety
17Ship Motions - Crew Safety
- Consequence
- Cognitive Degradation
- Physio-cognitive degradation
- Injury
- Mission Failure
- Death
- Process Variance
- Hydrodynamics
- No computational methods
- Sub-Scale Test Facilities do not support high
speed following seas - Risk Based Stochastic Methods can be used in lieu
of non-existent dynamic stability criteria - Viscous excitation
- Mitigation
- Sub Scale Tests to evaluate Failure Behaviors
- Sub Scale Tests Defining Incepting Events
- Neural Net Model Development to evaluate
operational envelope - Ride Control System Development
18High Speed Craft Motions
19Dynamic Stability
- Consequence
- Mission Failure due to Reduced Operability
- Capsize
- Certification for Intended Service
- Process Variance
- Hydrodynamics
- No computational methods
- Sub-Scale Test Facilities Limitations
- Risk Based Stochastic Methods can be used in lieu
of non-existent dynamic stability criteria - Dependence on Active Ride Control System - (Crew
Comfort Obj. Funct.) - Regulatory Body Rules
- High Level
- No prescriptive methods or metrics
- Mitigation
- Sub Scale Tests to evaluate Failure Behaviors
- Sub Scale Tests Defining Incepting Events
- Control Algorithm Development
- Evaluate operational envelope
- Feed into Ride Control System Development
- Transition Process, Methods and Metrics
20T-Foils
21Interceptors - Design
22Interceptors - Actuation
23Trim Tabs
24Dynamic Loads
- Consequence
- High Accelerations
- High Pressures
- Structural Failure
- Mission Restriction
- Loss of Ship
- Reduced Ship Life due to Fatigue
- Reduced Operability
- Process Variance
- Hydrodynamics
- No computational methods
- Sub-Scale Test Facilities do not support high
speed following seas - Direct Loads Analysis Design Approach In Place -
Needs Updating - Structural Response Leading to Failure Partially
Understood
- Mitigation
- Sub Scale Tests to evaluate extreme events -
(slamming) - Sub Scale Tests using Scaled Hydrodynamic and
Structural Model - Development of a Structural Operational Envelope
- Input to Ride Control System
- At sea graduated validation of ARCS
25System Performance Metrics for Ship Structures
- Structural Operational Capability (Co)
- the probability that the structure will support
operational needs such as those associated with
resisting combat, environmental or accidental
loading. - Structural Operational Dependability (Do)
- the probability that the ship structure will be
there throughout the mission, once the mission
begins. - Structural Operational Durability (Ao)
- the probability that the ship does not need
repair over its design life.
26Dynamic Loads Structural DesignTechnology
Development Areas
- Load and Load Effects
- Code development and validation
- SPECTRA, LAMP
- Probabilistic uncertainty characterization of
modeling and basic variables - Strength and Fatigue
- Analytical and numerical prediction methods
- Global lightweight structural strength
- Grillage strength
- Probabilistic fatigue
- Probabilistic uncertainty characterization of
modeling and basic variables - Criteria Development
- Reliability-based design approach addressing
metrics(Co,Do,Ao) - Serviceability Limit States (fatigue,
deformation, stiffness) - Strength Limit States (collapse, buckling,
yielding) - Reliability prediction methods per failure mode
- Reliability-based Acceptability Levels
27Speed - Power
- Consequence
- Equipment degradation
- Pump rotor erosion from cavitation
- Diesel loading at high torque conditions
- Excessively restricted operability
- Poor Acceleration
- Rapid degradation of performance over range of
ship loading conditions
- Process Variance
- Hydrodynamics - Hull Form
- Model tests uncertainty (hull interference drag
over range of speeds) - Lifting Body Interference Drag not quantified
- Hydrodynamics - Propulsor
- Highly constrained design space
- Rotor
- Inlet
- Discharge
- Mitigation
- Potential flow numeric modeling of X-Craft with
and without lifting body - Viscous numeric modeling of steady flow into
waterjet inlet - Sub Scale Effective Power Tests
- Match to vendor waterjet data
- Full Scale Trials to determine CA
28X-Craft Waterjet Performance
29Maneuverability
- Consequence
- Poor Controllability at High Speeds
- Ride control system robustness
- Ride control system efficacy as stability
controller during steady high speed maneuvers - Excessively restricted operability
RCS
Appnds
- Process Variance
- Hydrodynamics
- No computational methods to predict excitation
and restoration forces - Control Surfaces operating at Speeds Where
Supercavitation is expected - High Aggregate Uncertainty
- Lifting Body
- No data at these high Reynolds Numbers
- Mitigation
- Sub Scale Tests to evaluate extreme events
- Sub-scale tests of appendages
- control surfaces
- lifting body
- Neural Net Model Development of excitation and
response algorithms - Migrate to Ride Control System Development
30Lightweight Materials (6061-T6 Aluminum)
- Consequence
- Structural Failure
- Mission Restriction
- Loss of Ship
- Reduced Ship Life due to Fatigue
- Reduced Operability
- Mitigation
- Design Review - Ensure all Requirements are
understood - Ship yard process review
- Welder Certification
- Coupon Testing
- Feed back delivered strength into FEA
- Refine Operational Envelope
- Codify into ABS rules - DLA process
- Process Variance
- Welding heat treated aircraft grade material -
History of returning to fully annealed properties
(8 vice 21ksi) - Shipyard process
- Regulatory body (ABS) Certification
- Repair yard
- Deployed repairs
- Annealing conditions
31Science Objectives
- Resistance
- Fluid flow velocity measurements below free
surface - Free surface elevation measurements
- Pressure measurements
- Propulsion
- Laser measurements at ITTC stations
- Laser survey of waterjet rotor
- Flow Visualization
- Static Pressure measurements inside propulsor at
ITTC stations - Structures
- Accelerometers on submerged structure (TBL)
- Accelerometers to measure ship motions
- Pressure measurements for hull slams
- Strain Gages on primary structures
- Ring Laser Gyro to measure ship motions
- All relatively low risk but dependent on
sub-scale data for statistical relevance
32Ship Flow Measurements
- Below Free Surface
- LDV along side of ship (velocity and turbulence
data) - Pressure Gages Along length of ship (static and
dynamic pressures steady and in a seaway) - Accelerometers along length of ship (turbulence)
- Above Free Surface
- Forward Looking Radar (Developmental)
- Wave Buoys
- Free Surface Topology Sensors
Surface Topology Measurements
LDV Apertures
33Waterjet Flow Measurements
- Flow
- LDV at ITTC 96 Stations 3 7
- LDV at lower lip of waterjet inlet
- LDV at upper surface of waterjet inlet
- LDV on Rotor
- Pressure
- Static Pressure Measurements
- All LDV Stations
- No Pitot tube rake
- Accelerometers
- On pump casing
Flow, Pressure, and Accelerometer Measurements
34Modular Payload
- Total Open Systems Architecture Team (TOSA)
developed modular payload interface and handling
system - Evaluated existing systems
35Modular Payload Demonstration
36Launch and Recovery
- NSWCCD CCD Developed System
- 11m RHIB
- 40 Specwar Craft
- Loads
- Assumed Relative Motions
- Applied to weight of fully loaded craft
- Recoverability
- X-Craft motions minimum at higher ship speeds
- Ability of craft to operate in wake at high speed
unknown - Low speed recoverability can be determined from
sub scale test results
37Launch Recovery Problem
- How do we safely recover manned unmanned
vehicles at high speeds? - Hydrodynamic problem
- 2 bodies with independent motions in fluid
environment - Overcoming vessel wake and propeller/waterjet
turbulence - Systems Engineering problem
- Expand operating envelope through intelligent
Stern Ramp controls - Launch Recovery system requirements
- Compact
- Robust
- Light-weight
- Low maintenance
- Capable of rapid deployment and stowage
- Modeling problem
- - Developing effective high speed launch
recovery model tests
38Notional Recovery Method
NSWC Carderock Code 23 proposal
39Wake Issues
HSV wake at medium speed
40Wake Issues
SKJOLD high speed wake w/ 11 m RHIB
41X-CRAFT Lifting Body with polymer Drag
Reduction Lifting Body Design Pacific Marine
(U.S.) ? Drag Reduction System Cortana
Corporation ? At-Sea Testing
- Drag Reduction Technology Insertion
- Polymer Polyethylene Oxide (PEO)
- Natural oxide consisting primarily of fish mucin
- Biodegradable (20 in 50 days 100 in 9 months)
- 1000-3500 PPM at ejection point
- Reduction of Pollutant Emissions (entire vessel)
- Reduced propulsion load improves emissions by up
to 40 - Reduced transit times improves emissions by up to
15
- Lifting Body
- Hydrodynamic body providing dynamic buoyant
lift in ahead speed condition - Active Ride Control system integrated to mitigate
ship motions
- Lifting Body Objectives
- Measure Lift/Drag ratio
- Identify impact to top speed
- Safe Operation at all operating conditions
- Improve low speed ship dynamics (vertical plane
damping) - Increase payload capacity at high speeds
- Active Drag Reduction Objectives
- Reduce lifting body viscous drag
- Reduce atmospheric pollutants from propulsion
plant - Demonstrate active drag reduction applications
42Flag Authority for US Navy Ships
- Classification
- Certification
- INSURV
- WESURV
- OPTEVFOR
- IMO
- USCG
USN
Safe To Operate
To procure
Technical Warrant Holder
Owner
Flag
Contractor
To build
Flag
Flag
Designated Certification Agents
ABS
To Review
43Summary
- X-Craft Performance Deliberately Outside the
Range of Commercial and Military Experience - Significant Developmental Testing is Underway
- ONR Committed to Risk Reduction Efforts with
NAVSEA Support to ensure safe operation at the
intended level of service - Successful Technology Transition depends on
- Coherent sub-scale testing
- Numeric modeling
- Full scale trials
- Graduated operational certification
- Operational envelope
- Capture of knowledge in deterministic rules and
design methods - X-Craft will deliver the technology