Metadata and Web Content Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Metadata and Web Content Management

Description:

What is the role of metadata in web content management? ... We need successes to trumpet to build the momentum. Conclusion. Web Advisory Council: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:216
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: unknown8
Learn more at: https://firmcouncil.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Metadata and Web Content Management


1
Metadata and Web Content Management
  • Sam Gallagher
  • Departmental Web Manager
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

2
Role of Metadata
  • What is the role of metadata in web content
    management?
  • The answer varies from office to office, agency
    to agency.
  • The role of metadata varies from none at all to
    being an integral tool in managing web content.

3
Role of Metadata
  • For most of us, metadata isnt new, just reborn.
  • Many agencies have been using description and
    keywords for years with little guidance and no
    consistency.
  • Agencies that do use metadata consistently, built
    it into the content creation process.
  • The rest of us are trying to find our way through
    the jungle of terms, standards, and concepts.

4
Web Content Management
  • Web Content Management also varies by agency
  • Some content managers are also content owners
  • Some are editors
  • Others simply manage the content design/flow, but
    rely on content creators/editors
  • There are varying levels of understanding of the
    concept of metadata

5
Web Content Management
  • However, there are some commonalities
  • Our websites are huge
  • HUDs for example is something over 200,000
    documents
  • Our websites change frequently
  • Last Friday alone, HUD made over 700 changes.
  • Our website have become increasingly difficult to
    maintain

6
Web Content Management
  • In addition to having too much content, there are
    also too many websites more than 24,000
    government websites at last count.
  • The total number of web documents in the Federal
    space isnt known easily millions.
  • There is a proliferation of portals.
  • FirstGov lists more than 90 Portals.
  • Instead of reducing the clutter, many portals end
    up as duplicating navigational structures to
    content that already exists.

7
Web Content Management
  • And, there are a host of regulations and
    standards to follow.
  • The Web Content Managers Working Group found over
    16 laws, regulations, or policies directly
    affecting federal public websites.

8
Role of Metadata
  • What we are beginning to learn is Metadata can be
    a tool for helping us meet some of these demands.

9
Web Managers Advisory Council
  • Created in January 2004 as part of the
    Interagency Committee on Government Information.
  • Originally known as the Web Content Management
    Working Group.
  • An interagency group of 30 web managers, with
    representatives from every cabinet-level agency
    and many independent agencies.

10
Web Managers Advisory Council
  • Tasked with recommending policies and guidelines
    to OMB for all federal public websites.
  • Group issued its recommendations in June 2004 to
    OMB.
  • OMB issued policies for federal public websites
    on December 17, 2004.

11
Web Managers Advisory Council
  • After policies were issued, web managers saw the
    need for continuing discussions.
  • The Web Managers Working Group became the
    Advisory Council a community of web managers
    helping web managers.

12
The Metadata Discussion
  • One of the recommendations to OMB was the use of
    a standardized set of metadata.
  • Federal public websites must include metadata on
    the homepage and all major entry points

13
The Metadata Discussion
  • The arguments for standard metadata included
  • improve search relevancy,
  • provide an audit trail,
  • support website maintenance and administration,
    and
  • allow information to be tracked and assembled
    government-wide.

14
The Metadata Discussion
  • The arguments against standard metadata included
  • Commercial searches dont use metadata
  • Time/resource consuming
  • Education requirements
  • Too many documents to encode

15
The Metadata Discussion
  • During the comment period, 38 comments were
    received specifically relating to
    metadata--nearly all were positive.
  • In the end, the consensus was that the potential
    benefits could outweigh the costs.
  • Discussion then centered on how many and which
    elements to promote.

16
The Recommendation
  • The Working Group agreed on
  • Mandatory use of 6 elements
  • Require use of metadata on homepage and major
    entry points only
  • If an agency wanted to use more elements, refer
    to Dublin Core

17
The Recommendation
  • The 6 elements agreed upon were
  • Title
  • Description
  • Creator
  • Date Created
  • Date Reviewed
  • Language

18
OMBs Policies
  • OMB did not choose to specifically include
    metadata in their policies.
  • However, the Web Managers Advisory Council
    continues to promote the use of standard
    metadata.
  • Created the Metadata Task Group to continue the
    discussion and promote the use of metadata.

19
Metadata Standards
  • While no standard has been issued, consensus has
    centered on the use of the Dublin Core metadata
    standard.
  • Already existing international standard
  • Relatively easy to implement
  • Already used by Great Britain, Canada, Australia
    and several federal agencies in the U.S.

20
Metadata Standards
  • Based on the consensus to use Dublin Core, the
    Web Advisory Council is now advising agencies to
    use the following elements
  • dc.title
  • dc.description
  • dc.creator
  • dc.date.created
  • dc.date.reviewed
  • dc.language

21
Metadata Standards
  • While not yet a recommendation, there is a
    growing discussion on the need for standardized
    vocabularies for
  • dc.audience
  • dc.subject
  • Some limited work is underway to create a
    controlled vocabulary for audience.

22
The Role of Metadata
  • Web managers throughout the federal government
    struggle with some of the same issues
  • It is often difficult to find out who owns
    content
  • Ensuring content remains current and accurate is
    a monumental undertaking
  • Competition for space on the front page makes it
    difficult to get people to the content they need.

23
The Role of Metadata
  • The role of metadata in web management comes back
    to those pros
  • improve search relevancy,
  • provide an audit trail,
  • support website maintenance and administration,
    and
  • allow information to be tracked and assembled
    government-wide.

24
Improve Search Relevancy
  • While commercial searches like Google and Yahoo
    may not use metadata YET
  • We could use metadata to improve the searches on
    our own sites
  • FirstGov, while not currently set-up to take
    advantage of metadata, could be in the future
  • If you build it, they will come

25
Provide an Audit Trail
  • Several of the elements were selected for their
    ability to create an audit trail. For example
  • Creator identifies who/which office is
    responsible for the content
  • Date Reviewed identifies old, possibly obsolete,
    documents

26
Support Website Maintenance
  • Metadata gives us a method for
  • Tracking down who is responsible for content
  • Ensuring content is current/accurate
  • Archiving appropriate content from one
    administration to the next
  • Identifying content by language

27
Aggregate Content
  • With the use of Audience and Subject, we could
  • Discover redundant/duplicative content
  • Find content that needs to be brought up to
    higher levels of the website
  • Aggregate content from within our organizations
    and across organizations
  • This could lead to reducing the need for portals.

28
What is being done now?
  • Metadata has been the subject of a session at
    each of the last three web content managers
    conferences.
  • Interest is high, but there are still doubts
  • Metadata task group of the Web Advisory Council
    is
  • Creating guidance/tools for implementing metadata
  • Beginning work on a controlled vocabulary for
    Audience

29
Next Steps
  • There needs to be a proven benefit
  • Weve made one attempt to show how metadata could
    be used across agencies

30
Next Steps
  • Metadata has to be easily implemented
  • Simple tools need to be developed
  • Tools should be integrated into the content
    creation process
  • Education developed on the benefits gained by the
    consistent use of metadata

31
Conclusion
  • The role of metadata in web content management is
    just beginning
  • We see the potential
  • We have some tentative first steps
  • We need successes to trumpet to build the momentum

32
Conclusion
  • Web Advisory Council
  • Continues to meet once a month.
  • Plans and holds web manager conferences
  • Manages a website
  • www.webcontent.gov
  • Hurricane Katrina www.youragency.gov/katrina

33
Conclusion
  • Contact info
  • Kate Donohue
  • E-mail kathleen.donohue_at_occ.treas.gov
  • Phone 202-874-4976
  • Jeffrey Levy
  • E-mail Levy.Jeffrey_at_epa.gov
  • Phone 202-564-9727

34
Questions/Comments?
  • Metadata task group
  • Sam Gallagher202-708-1547sam_r._gallagher_at_hud.go
    v
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com