RPCs: Introduction, R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

RPCs: Introduction, R

Description:

... 12 RRCs into a module called a 'Toaster' ... Shipping Containers bear the Toaster weight, Particle Board is ... is why we build a toaster but add the toast at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: jcoo4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RPCs: Introduction, R


1
RPCs Introduction, RD Status
  • Recall that Glass RPCs are our design base
  • This is a conservative choice based on the
    successful BELLE experience with their barrel
    and endcap muon systems
  • BELLE has 5,000 m2 of such chambers
  • BELLE has operated them without problems for 5
    years
  • No chamber replaced, no degradation in efficiency

ground plane
Signal pickup strips in x
Resistive paint
insulator
Glass plates
8 kV
Optional Signal pickup strips in y
Resistive paint
Spacers
2
Off-Axis scheme
RPC double layer
Absorber Particle board 8 ft x 28 ft magic max
size From industry, 1 inch thick 0.7 gm/cc
Ground plane
Absorber Particle board
Horizontal strips About 3.7 cm wide, 17 micron Cu
foil on Particle Board 64 channels
Vertical strips, About 4.4 cm wide, Cu on
Particle Board 3 x 64 192 channels
If BOTH strips, called XANDY If one per layer,
XORY (and half the electronics)
  • 6 separate chambers, each 2.84m by 2.43m, 3mm
    thick glass (vs. BELLE 2mm)
  • Arranged in two layers to get full efficiency
    (offset dead spacer areas)
  • Call this unit an RRA , RPC Readout board
    Assembly
  • 4 layers of glass, 2 layers of strips on Particle
    Board, ground plane on opposite side, assorted
    resistive paint and insulating layers
  • 2 more outside Particle Boards for protection

3
Next, assemble 12 RRCs into a module called a
Toaster
Structural angle shelf for RPC and absorber
support. aluminum endwall uses L 6 x 6 x
1/2 Steel end is 3/8
1/8 in. skin with 1/8 in ribs. Endframe is
aluminum on one end, steel on the other end
Composite particle board corner post formed by
sandwiching 3 inch of absorber between two 1/2
inch thick aluminum plates
STRONG structural sidewall particle board absorber
12 in
8 rows of 5/8 in countersunk bolts, 3 bolts/row.
Metal/particle board surfaces are also glued
Corner Posts inspired by ISO Shipping
Containers bear the Toaster weight,
Particle Board is self-supporting between
the 2 endwalls
4
Fill the toasters with particle board toast at
the far site, Stack the Toasters 2 wide, 8 high,
75 deep
1200 Toasters in all
70 more rows
5 cm between rows
aluminum endframes at the center crack, Only
0.033 dead space
Total dead space is 1.98 , Dominated by the
Noryl edge spacers on each RPC Minimizing
this was a design goal
steel endframes to the outside (cheaper)
HV, electronics, gas all on outside edges
5
Some RPC Design parameters
  • 86,400 RPCs
  • 596,000 m2 120 x BELLE (2.84m x 2.43m) x
    6 x 12 x 1200
  • 6.5 M sq ft of glass and of Copper foil
  • 42,120 ft3 of Gas
  • Recirculating gas system, sophisticated by
    definition, different from BELLE
  • 3 chambers in series, 1 volume change per day,
    more than BELLE
  • 3.7 M Channels of electronics
  • Modular design has more vertical strips /
    channels
  • 86,400 Channels of HV (every individual RPC)
  • 86 million pounds of particle board
  • Overall Cost
  • the XANDY RPC Alternate design turns out to be
    19 more than the Liquid Scintillator design
    see Ginas talk
  • So pennies / lb, pennies / sq ft, pennies /
    channel all of them matter lead to Ms

6
How we got to this point
  • The present design was a compromise between RPC
    enthusiasts in favor of monolithic structures
    (like the liquid scintillator) and modular
    structures using intermodal shipping containers
  • We compromised so that a solution could be
    written up by our small group of 4 physicists and
    6 engineers on a deadline of last September
  • In retrospect we all agree we compromised on a
    solution that has the worlds most expensive
    custom container, a container so large that we
    cant fill it and transport it on US Interstate
    highways.
  • This is why we build a toaster but add the toast
    at the far site
  • Committee design of an elephant resulted in a
    white elephant?
  • So we are again separately pursuing the monolith
    container solutions
  • Each seeking a lower cost with adequate
    performance
  • We still meet together every week

7
So next you will hear talks aiming at RPC cost
reductions
  • Mostly this is a list of ideas with RD yet to be
    done
  • John Cooper - Back to the Container Idea
  • Carl Bromberg - Back to the Monolithic Idea
  • Rich Talaga - Basic changes to the RPCs
    themselves
  • Rich will give Gary Drakes talk - Status of the
    RPC ASIC
  • Rich Schmitt - Ideas to reduce the Gas System
    cost
  • John Cooper - Summary and our list of Critical
    RD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com