Understanding Research Articles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding Research Articles

Description:

Hatch EE, Palmer JR, Titus-Ernstoff L, Noller KL, Kaufman RH, et al. Cancer risk ... Scientific articles in journals tend to be divided into sections: Abstract ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: barbara306
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding Research Articles


1
Understanding Research Articles
  • What the Heck
  • are they
  • Taking About?

Seminar I B. J. French, PhD, RN
2
Reading References
Authors
  • Hatch EE, Palmer JR, Titus-Ernstoff L, Noller KL,
    Kaufman RH, et al. Cancer risk in women exposed
    to diethylstilbestrol in utero. JAMA
    1998280(7)630-4.

Name of Article
Year Published
Journal (abbreviation)
Pages in journal
Volume (Issue )
3
Lay Out of Articles
  • Scientific articles in journals tend to be
    divided into sections
  • Abstract
  • Introduction (Background, Lit Review)
  • Methods
  • Results/Findings
  • Discussion/Conclusion
  • References

4
Abstract
  • At the very beginning of the article
  • It is a brief review of the entire article
  • Ask yourself these questions as you read it
  • What was studied?
  • Who participated in the study?
  • How and where was the research done?
  • What did the researchers find?

5
Introduction
  • Sometimes this is called "Background" or
    "Literature Review"
  • Normally, the authors will describe what they're
    about to study and why it's important
  • They also give lots of information on what is
    already known on the topic

6
Methods
  • This section is designed to explain
  • who participated in the research
  • how they were chosen
  • the design of the research
  • What kind of research was done?
  • How was it done?
  • Did it involve review of medical records?
  • Does it measuring the effectiveness of a new drug
    or intervention?
  • how the results were examined, analyzed
    statistically

7
Methods Ask Yourself
  • Who were the people who were studied?
  • Where they live, age, ethnicity, etc.
  • Did the authors pick participants in such a way
    that findings should matter to anyone else?
  • (a) Randomness.
  • Was the participants' selection pretty much by
    chance or are they just convenient
  • (b) Inclusiveness.
  • "All patients between 1997 to 2006"
  • Are there phrases that imply the researcher tried
    to include a broad group of subjects.
  • This isn't the same as randomness, but it does
    help with applicability

8
Results
  • This section tells you specifically what the
    authors found
  • You're likely to find tables and graphs
  • Key words to look for are "statistically
    significant," "significant," or "not significant"
  • These words tell you whether the authors'
    findings may just be the result of chance, or
    whether they're likely to really mean something

9
Results - Example
  • If a new headache drug is being tested, and the
    author tells you that those who took the drug had
    "significantly less pain than those who did not
    take it"
  • that means there's fairly strong evidence that
    the drug really works
  • Sometimes "not significant" is important too
  • If you read an article that studied whether
    living near electrical lines increases your risks
    of developing cancer, and the authors' results
    tell you that there was "no significant
    difference between people who lived near the
    lines and those who did not," that's good news!

10
Discussion
  • This section should interpret what the research
    findings mean and how they're relevant
  • The authors should also describe the limitations
    of their research
  • They should discuss what you can and can't
    conclude, what the research failed to find, and
    things that may affect how relevant the findings
    are to other people

11
Mean
  • Mean is just a fancy word for average
  • It's the sum of all the values or scores, divided
    by the number, of people in the study or group

12
Median
  • The median is nothing more than the score or
    value that falls closest to the middle
  • Half of the individual scores are higher than the
    median while the other half are lower

13
Mean and Median
  • If you have five numbers 0, 0, 5, 10, 30, the
    mean or average would be 9 (005103045
    45/59)
  • The median, however, would be 5, for there are
    two scores above and two scores below

14
Standard Deviation
  • It tells you how spread out the data or
    information is
  • For example, imagine that you're going to have a
    relatively new spinal surgery. You've been told
    that only five people have had this surgery at
    your hospital, and that their mean (average)
    length of stay was 24 days.
  • Suppose the hospital stays for those five people
    were 22, 22, 24, 25 and 26 days.
  • The mean length of stay is 24 days
  • Suppose instead their hospital stays looked like
    this 6 days, 8 days, 10, days, 31 days, and 65
    days
  • The mean is again 24 days.
  • It is this spread between scores or values that
    the standard deviation describes

15
Statistically Significant?
  • Because health problems occur for a variety of
    reasons, including chance, researchers must
    determine if a health effect they are studying
    may have occurred in study participants as a
    result of chance alone

16
Statistically Significant
  • Specifically, "statistical significance" refers
    to a finding in a research study that is larger
    or smaller than would be expected by chance alone

17
Stastically Significant
  • Did people get cancer in a specific area of the
    country more than would be generally expected?
  • Did people who took a certain drug have more
    heart problems than would be expected in the
    general population?

18
Statistical Significance
  • Researchers test their findings - those means and
    averages we talked about - for statistical
    significance
  • They try to control for other factors outside of
    the ones they're studying

19
Statistical Significance
  • When researchers test for statistical
    significance, they compare different sets of
    values
  • - such as bladder infections before and bladder
    infections after using a medication
  • while taking into account
  • how many people participated in the research
  • how dramatic their findings seem to be
  • what some of the characteristics were of the
    people they compared
  • If the researcher finds that the probability
    value is low (usually less than 5, 1 or even
    1/10th of 1), they can conclude that the drug
    really does work

20
Probability
  • These probability values - called p values -
    represent percentages, but are typically
    represented as plt.05, plt.01, or plt.001, or more
    specifically, as p.023, p.0067
  • For example, plt.01 means that there is a less
    than 1 chance that our bladder medication seemed
    to work because of chance alone
  • If probabilities are low, researchers describe
    them as statistically significant

21
Probability
  • Remember the lower the p value, the smaller the
    percentage, the greater the significance and the
    less likely that something happened just because
    of chance

22
What is Significant Enough?
  • It depends on what's being studied, the potential
    benefit or harm of the findings, and the author's
    own standards
  • Generally in medical and nursing literature you
    are looking for a significance level of plt.05
  • or a less than 1 in 20 chance that it works,
    makes a difference, etc.

23
Proof
  • Researchers - especially in health related
    research - should not be telling you that they
    proved that one thing causes or leads to another
  • Instead, the message should be that one thing is
    related to another

24
Validity
  • Did the instruments used measure what they were
    intending to measure?

25
Peer Reviewed Journal
  • Scientific journals require research articles to
    go through a process called "peer review"
  • During peer review, scientific experts who were
    not connected to the study review the article and
    decide whether it was done properly and whether
    the findings have merit

26
Credibility
  • Health care providers trust and use research
    published in credible, peer-reviewed scientific
    journals
  • Experts have reviewed studies published in these
    journals to make sure they are of high quality
  • Some examples of credible, peer-reviewed journals
    are JAMA, the Journal of the National Cancer
    Institute, the New England Journal of Medicine,
    and Science

27
Credibility
  • What are authors credentials?
  • Does article list where they work or did
    research?
  • An email is often listed, so if you have a
    question you can contact author (or
    representative)

28
Sources of Information
  • http//www.craighospital.org/SCI/METS/articles.asp
  • Hinton, P. R. (1998) Statistics Explained,
    Routledge Press, NY.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com