Title: Mental Health and Cannabis Loose Ends
1Mental Health and Cannabis Loose Ends
- 2006 National Organization for the Reform of
Marijuana Laws Conference, San Francisco,
California - Sunil Aggarwal
- 4th Year MD/PhD student
- University of Washington
- Departments of Geography and Medicine
2- Cannabis use and schizotypy weak evidence
- Cannabis Abuse Disorder mental disorder or
acceptance of a governmental disorder?
3Please Bear in Mind
- Mental illness has always been a source of
misunderstanding, fear, and social contestation - Socially constructed or biologically grounded?
Or both? - DSM-IV Diagnostics and Statistical Manual for
Mental Disorders (available freely)
4Cannabis use and schizotypy
- FACTS
- - Higher rates of cannabis use (and other
psychoactive substances) in schizotypic
population cf. w/ gen. pop.helpful? - - In predisposed individuals, cannabis use can
exacerbate psychotic Sx that were once in
remission - - Can cannabis use can unmask schizotypy in
predisposed? Some weak evidence
5Problems with this type of research
- Design, method, assumptions
- Doesnt consider context or mental health effects
of marijuana stigmahow does criminalization of
cannabis figure into the lived experience of the
cannabinated state and the life experience of a
cannabis user in general - As Mirken and Earleywine state in their letter in
response to a recent study Someone using a
substance that is both illegal and socially
frowned-upon almost by definition has ideas or
beliefs that others do not share. This is not a
sign of mental illness, but rather an indication
of a rational, thinking person realistically
assessing his or her situation. Considering the
widespread use of undercover officers in drug
stings, the same can be said for feeling other
people cannot be trusted. - Fergusson, DM et al. Tests of causal linkages
between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms.
Addiction, 100, 3354366, 2005. - Mirken B, Earleywine M. The cannabis and
psychosis connection questioned a comment on
Fergusson et al. Addiction. 2005
May100(5)714-5 author reply 715-6.
6United Kingdom Advisory Council on the Misuse of
Drugs Findings -(2006)
- The evidence for the existence of an association
between frequency of cannabis use and the
development of psychosis is, on the available
evidence, weak. The council does not advise the
reclassification of cannabis products to Class B
it recommends they remain within Class C.
7UK ACMD contd
- In the last year, over three million people
appear to have used cannabis but very few will
ever develop this distressing and disabling
condition. And many people who develop
schizophrenia have never consumed cannabis. Based
on the available data the use of cannabis makes
(at worst) only a small contribution to an
individuals risk for developing schizophrenia. - For individuals, the current evidence suggests,
at worst, that using cannabis increases the
lifetime risk of developing schizophrenia by one
per cent.
8Cannabis Abuse Mental Disorder a la DSM-IV
- DSM-IV used by clinicians and researchers around
the world in numerous areas such as family
medicine, internal medicine, psychiatry,
emergency medicine, psychology, social work,
nursing, occupational and rehabilitation therapy,
counseling, and other health and mental health
fields - Diagnosis code 305.20
- Important mental disorder for which we have
public health, medicine, and law enforcement
working jointly for DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND
PREVENTION need accuracy
9Cannabis Abuse Disorder Diagnostic Criteria
(cannabis substance)
- A maladaptive pattern of cannabis use leading to
clinically significant impairment or distress, as
manifested by one (or more) of the following,
occurring within a 12-month period - (1) recurrent cannabis use resulting in a failure
to fulfill major role obligations at work,
school, or home (e.g., repeated absences or poor
work performance related to cannabis use
cannabis-related absences, suspensions, or
expulsions from school neglect of children or
household)
10(2) recurrent cannabis use in situations in which
it is physically hazardous (e.g., driving an
automobile or operating a machine when impaired
by cannabis use) (3) recurrent cannabis-related
legal problems (e.g., arrests for
cannabis-related disorderly conduct) (4)
continued cannabis use despite having persistent
or recurrent social or interpersonal problems
caused or exacerbated by the effects of the
cannabis (e.g., arguments with spouse about
consequences of intoxication, physical fights)
11Cannabis-related legal problems, Criterion A3
- Diagnosis (1 of 15 possible ways)
-
- Patient X has a maladaptive pattern of
substance use leading to clinically significant
impairment or distress as manifested by recurrent
substance-related legal problems occurring within
a 12-month period. -
-
12Specific Guidance from the DSM-IV
- Legal problems
- arrests for substance-related disorderly
conduct - legal problems may occur as a consequence of
arrests for cannabis possession. -
- cocaine abuse possession or use
- hallucinogen abuse possession
- amphetamine abuse possession or use
- ETC.
13DSM-IV Guidelines continued
- The category of Substance Abuse does not apply
to caffeine or nicotine. - The term abuse should be applied only to a
pattern of substance use that meets the criteria
for this disorder the term should not be used as
a synonym for use, misuse, or hazardous use - In order for an Abuse criterion to be met, the
substance-related problem must have occurred
repeatedly during the same 12-month period or
been persistent.
14DSM-IV Guidelines Continued
- Substance-Related Disorders are distinguished
from nonpathological substance use (e.g.,
social drinking) and from the use of
medications for appropriate medical purposes by
the presence of a pattern of multiple symptoms
occurring over an extended period of time (e.g.,
tolerance, withdrawal, compulsive use) or the
presence of substance-related problems (e.g.,
medical complications, disruption in social and
family relationships, vocational or financial
difficulties, legal problems)
15Implications and Corollaries
- One way that social drinking, an example of
nonpathological substance use, can be
distinguished from pathological cannabis-related
use disorders is by the presence of legal
problems - One way the use of medications for appropriate
medical purposes can be distinguished from
pathological cannabis related use disorders is by
the presence of legal problems. - Not considered
- -that medications might, in fact not be legal
- -that other forms of nonpathological substance
use are possible with substances aside from
alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine
16Cannabis Abuse Mental Disorder in (Legal
Problems-A3) in Action
- 2003 NSDUH survey questions re abuse taken right
from DSM-IV - IF MAR12MON 1 - 3 During the past 12 months,
did using marijuana or hashish cause you to do
things that repeatedly got you in trouble with
the law? - 1 Yes
- 2 No
- 3 DK/REF
- 13.685 yes answers in 2003
- Big difference when extrapolating to the 22
million abusing and dependent figure
17Mental Disorder Legal Problems In Action,
Continued
- Marijuana arrests and increase in marijuana use
disorders. Earleywine M. JAMA. 2004 Aug
18292(7)802 - Recurrent marijuana-related legal problems
qualify users for the abuse diagnosis. Marijuana
arrests increased dramatically in the decade
studied (1991-2001)which could account for the
observed increases in the disorders.
18This Big Questions
- Is there any other medical explanation other than
an underlying cannabis abuse mental disorder that
would explain why individuals engage in cannabis
use that can lead to legal problems or has a high
potential of doing so? - Will we let moralism influence our answer to this
question? Or radical empirics and reason? - Remember homosexuality was officially a
sociopathic personality disturbance until 1973
19Conflation of Cannabis With Chemical Concentrates
- Dr. Nora Volkow, Director of the American
National Institute on Drug Abuse - This interacts with our endocannabinoid system
which is all throughout our bodies. Which is so
connected with how we live and experience our
physical bodies and mental states.
Human-cannabis political ecology.
20We must end
- American federal regulatory denialism of
cannabiss medicinal properties - Medical moralism