Title: The Impact of Computer Training
1The Impact of Computer Training
- Leela Collins
- Mary Hughes
- Shashi Srinath
- ISTC 685 Research in Instructional Technology
- April 24, 2007
2Statement of Problem
- The purpose of this study was to investigate the
effect of teacher computer training on the
integration of computers in elementary school
instruction. - Teacher computer training is defined as classes
that will allow teachers to become comfortable
using the software and hardware available at
their school.
3Hypothesis
- Elementary school teachers who receive proper
training in the use of computers will incorporate
computer technology at a higher rate than those
teachers that do not receive the training.
4Methodology
- This research study used both descriptive (or
survey research) and action research.
5Descriptive Research
- Teachers at two elementary schools will be given
the Teacher Technology Expertise MSDE Survey
2007-2008. - Part One of the survey will use the interval
level of measurement to find the mean that will
lead to the standard deviation. - Part Two of the survey will use simple tallying.
That data will then be translated into a ratings
scale.
6Rating Scale
7- Teachers at School A will indicate their skill
level with computer technology by placing sticky
notes on a continuum. - This will help determine what level of training
is needed. - Teachers will be given an opportunity to request
what they would like to learn about technology.
8- Training will be provided for school A and not
for School B. - Lab usage logs will be used.
- Follow up interviews will be conducted with
teachers who received training.
9Action Research
- Month-to-month lab usage charts for the computer
labs in each school will be compared to determine
how often the computers are used during the
school day. - A line graph will illustrate lab usage
throughout the school year. A double line graph
will be used to compare lab usage in School A to
School B.
10Implications
- (Factors that could have an impact on the
use of technology) - Changes in curriculum technology including
- Updates, new platforms, software
hardware - The actual physical environment of the computer
lab - Too small, too noisy, outdated equipment,
and maintenance issues - Administrative support
- If the principal is on board,
a project has a better
chance of - succeeding
11Leelas Abstract
-
- Just as our students are diverse, so
are teachers. When training teachers, it is
essential to use technology that it meets the
specific needs of the teachers. Furthermore,
teachers have various skills, and experiences,
therefore the training should be provided to help
at the current point they are in with technology.
Workshops and in-services alone are not going to
cut it. There should be more of an emphasis on
helping teachers learn how to incorporate
technology in their instruction and for student
learning. Also, it is beneficial to recognize
the different views and attitudes each generation
of teachers have, in order to better prepare them
with the use of technology. - After all, the goal is to have teachers feel
more comfortable - with the integration of technology and not fear
using it!
12Marys Abstract
-
- It was thought that the introduction of
the computer into the classroom would radically
boost student achievement levels and dramatically
improve test scores. Indeed, with the advent of
the No Child Left Behind Act, it was hoped that
placing computers in schools would also help to
level the playing field between high and low
socio-economic groups. Accordingly, millions of
dollars, nationwide, have been spent on
educational technology. But research studies are
dashing the dreams of those who promoted computer
technology as the panacea for schools. The
largest study of all, just released on April 3rd,
proclaimed, educational software has no
significant impact on student performance (U.S.
Department of Education, 2007). - Why doesnt this compute?
- Is it human error?
- If educators institute effective technology
training, - can schools finally count on computers?
13Shashis Abstract
- How has teacher computer training
- effected the extent of integration of computers
in elementary school instruction? -
- Lavelle, Liu and Theodore (2004) showed that
- teachers lack of experience with computers
their confidence level in using them affected the
successful integration of technology - online instruction for teachers was important
- Christensen (1997) focused on
- the teachers perceptions of technology
- showing that positive teacher attitudes fostered
positive attitudes in students - Teresa D. Williams (2004) concluded that
- teachers exposed to technology increased their
understanding use of databases - a teachers age made a difference in how he/she
directed high school students to use computers - Bebell Russell (2004) studied the teacher,
school, and district organizational
characteristics associated with increased use of
technology - concluding that the school system influences the
teachers use of technology - Dwyer, Ringstaff Sandholtz (1995) illustrated
- the importance of a longitudinal approach to
investigate innovation, - stressing motivation of teachers by professional
development to face the unfamiliar challenges - Technology integration is still work in progress.
More research is needed.
14Summation
- The computer, relatively new teaching tool that
it is, must be effectively harnessed by teachers
to ensure that todays students are able to
function in the world of tomorrow.
15- The question, then, is how best to have teachers
comfortably incorporate computers into their
lessons, their assignments, and the lives of
their students.
16- References
- Airasian, P., Gay, R. P., Mills, E. G. (2006).
Educational research Competencies for analysis
and applications. New Jersey Pearson. - Alexiou-Ray, A. J., Peirano, A., Wilson, E.,
Wright, H. V. (n.d.) Changing instructional
practice The impact of technology integration on
students, parents, and school personnel.
Electronic Journal for the Integration of
Technology in Education, 2(2), Retrieved April
16, 2007, from http//ejite.isu.edu - Autio, O., Lavonen, J., Meisalo, V. (2004).
Creative and collaborative problem solving in
technology education A case study in primary
school teacher education. Journal of Technology
Studies, 30(2), Retrieved January 18, 2007, from
http//web.ebscohost.com/ehost
17 Beggs, T. A. (2000). Influences and barriers to
the adoption of instructional technology. In
Proceedings of the mid-south. Instructional
Technology Conference, Retrieved January
27, 2007, from Eric database. Changing the
conversational about teaching, learning and
technology, a report on ten years of ACOT
research. Apple Computers Inc. Retrieved March 2,
2007, from http//images.apple.com/education/k12/
Christensen, R (1998). Effect of technology
integration education on the attitudes
of teachers and their students. Doctoral
Dissertation, from University of north Texas,
Denton, Retrieved January 25,2007.
18 Crews, B. T., McCannon, M. (2000). Assessing
the technology training needs of
elementary school teachers. JI. .Of Technology
and Teacher Education, 8, Retrieved
April 17, 2007, from EBSCO database.
Duran, M., Taylor, J. (2006). Teaching
social studies with technology New
research on collaborative approaches. History
Teacher, 40(1), Retrieved January 18,
2007, from EBSCO database. Dwyer, D.C.,
Sandholtz, J. H. (1990). Teaching in high-tech
environments Classroom management
revisited, first four year findings.
Apple Classroom for Tomorrow Research,
Retrieved February 10, 2007, from ACOT.
19Dwyer, C.D., Ringstaff, C, Sandholtz, H. J.
Teaching in high-tech environments classroom
management revisited first - fourth year
findings. Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow Research,
Report (10), Retrieved January 27, 2007, from
Apple Classroom of Tomorrow. Dynarski, M.,
Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, L.,
Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W.,
Javitz, H., Emery, D., Sussex, W. (2007).
Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software
products Findings from the first student cohort,
Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Education,
Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved April
18, 2007, from http//ies.ed/gov/ncee/pdf/20074005
.pdf
20Franklin, T. (2000). Predicators of Ohio k-4
student competencies on the national educational
technologies standards. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the American Educational
Research Association. Retrieved March 8, 2007,
from EBSCO database. Levin, T., Wadmany, R.
(2006). Teacher's beliefs and practices in
technology-based classroom A development view.
Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 39(2). Retrieved April 18, 2007, from
EBSCO database.
21Liu, Y., Theodore, P., Lavelle, E. (2004,
January). Experimental effects of online
instruction on teachers concerns about
technology integration. International Journal of
Instructional Technology and Distance Learning.
Retrieved January 23, 2007, from
http//www.itdl.org/journal/Jan_04/article03.htm
ODwyer, L., Russell, M., Bebell, D. (2004).
Identifying teacher, school and district
characteristics associated with elementary
teachers use of technology A multi-level
perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives,
12. Retrieved January 26, 2007, from
http//epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n48/v12n48.pdf
22Paley, A. (2007). Software's benefits on tests in
doubt Study saystools don't raise scores. The
Washington Post. Retrieved April 3, 2007.
William, D. T., Grimble., J. B., Irwin, M.
(2004). Teachers link to electronic resources in
the library media center a local study of
awareness, knowlwdge and influence. School
Library Media Research. Retrieved January 24,
2007, from http//www.ala.org/ala/ Wilson, B.,
Peterson, K. (1995). Successful technology in
an elementary school A case study.
Practitioners write the book What
works in Educational Technology, Retrieved
January 25, 2007, from
http//carbon.cudenver.edu/bwilson/peakview.html
23- Yocam, K. Creating an alternative context for
teacher development ACOTS two-year pilot
project. Apple Classroom of Tomorrow, Retrieved
February 10, 2007 from ACOT.