Title: 4th Economic and Social Rights Report SAHRC
14th Economic and Social Rights Report - SAHRC
- National Treasury presentation to the Joint
Budget Committee - 11 November 2003
2Overview
- The SAHRC is empowered by the constitution to
monitor and assess observance of economic
social rights - National Treasury recognises important role of
SAHRC - Need to clarify how SAHRC role fits in given
oversight role of Parliament and legislatures - How do we hold government and its departments to
account for their performance
3What is stated in chapter 13
- Examines role of treasuries policy,
programmatic legislative Constitution - Challenge treasuries on their role in meeting
economic and social rights of SAns - Comments on nominal and real values in budget
allocations 1999/00 to 2001/02 - Role of treasury in budget allocative process
does it ensure realisation of economic and social
rights
4Methodology
- However, data collection methodology is severely
limited - should use existing budget documents - Existing survey methodology lacks validation
- While some findings are useful, needs to
recognise importance of collective responsibility
in Government - What is the appropriate role of Treasuries in
promoting economic social rights?
5Our response focuses on..
- Intergovernmental system and budget
decentralisation - Role of Treasury
- Reforms that improve resource allocations
- MTEF
- Budget Process
- Measurable objectives and service delivery targets
6Intergovernmental System and Budget
Decentralisation
- Constitution establishes 3 spheres
- Section 214 divides nationally-raised revenue
between 3 spheres - Takes account of functions and fiscal capacity of
each sphere - National govt or departments cannot determine
budget of province or municipality - Spheres not tiers, with govts not administrations
- Cannot hold one sphere resp for another
- Water provision a municipal function, cannot
expect a provincial treasury to know what funds
are spent on water
7Role of Treasuries
- Constitution
- Chapter 13 and section 216 in particular
- PFMA
- Manage the budget preparation process
- Manage implementation of annual national budget
- Facilitate implementation of the DoRA
- Coordinate intergovernmental fiscal and financial
relations - Budget allocations determined by Cabinet,
provincial EXCO or mayoral/executive committee - Budget reforms to widen participation
- MINCOMBUD, Cabinet, Budget Council, B Forum
8Performance in Government
- HR report grappling with difficult concept
- Does not take account of key performance
documents in national/provincial govt - ENE, IGFR
- Strategic plans and performance measures
- Survey methodology is problematic
- Figures provided are inaccurate
- Figures cannot be compared btw govts like IGFR
- Assess a government as a whole
- Cannot assess every dept to perform every other
function - Treasuries are a type of back-office operation
9Outputs and Inputs
- HR report focuses on inputs rather than outputs
- Need to focus on outputs
- Inputs like how money says nothing about
performance - Key is to assess how resources used
- Example of school education
- Budget of R45 bn, but 80 used for personnel
- Key is to contain personnel expenditure, increase
capital and npnc (learner support materials etc) - Role of parliament and legislatures in holding
executive to account, approving budget etc
10Budget reforms in SA
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
2002 2003
- Accounting standards
- Procurement reform
- Plannning, budgeting, reporting link
-
Measurable objectives
Strategic plans tabled in Parliament
Estimates of National Expenditure
Public Finance Management Act
National Expenditure Survey
Medium Term Expenditure Framework
Intergovernmental System
11MTEF budget process
Medium term policy review
Macroeconomic framework, fiscal policy DoR
Preparation of MTSF
MTBPS
Cabinet lekgotla
Cabinet lekgotla
Jan April July
Oct 2003
Departmental and agency planning budgeting
Preparing budget submissions
MTEC review recommendations to Cabinet
Preparation of Budget Documents
May Aug Nov
Feb 2004
12Medium Term Expenditure Framework
- Based on four principles
- Fiscal policy and the budget framework
- Policy priorities and public expenditure
- Political oversight of the budget process
- Budgeting for service delivery
- Budget is driven by priorities like
poverty-alleviation, social services and grants,
economic priorities, crime-prevention etc
13(1) Factors affecting fiscal policy
- Level of taxation
- Rise in tax burden may impede economic growth
- Slowdown in tax burden may require higher
borrowing or less spending - Level of borrowing
- Borrowing for investment may boost longer-term
growth - Interest costs may crowd out other expenditure in
the long term - Too much Govt. borrowing pushes up interest rates
- Balance between capital and recurrent spending
14How three-year budgeting works
2003 MTEF
- Increase to baseline, determined by
- Revised macroeconomic framework
- Draw down on contingincy reserve
- Policy priorities / alignment with dept. business
plans - Vertical division of revenue
- Inflation adjustment in 3rd year.
2003/04
2004 MTEF
2004/05
baseline
2004/05
2005/06
2005/06
baseline
2006/07
15(2) Policy priorities and public expenditure
- MTEF budget process strengthens link between
policy priorities and expenditure - Departmental strategic planning aligned with
medium-term policy priorities - Budget submissions based on strategic plan and
policy priorities - Budgets evaluated on basis of Governments
priorities articulated by Political Executive
Child support grant extended to indigent children
under 14 yrs phased in over the 2003 MTEF
period. Priority is to reduce poverty and
vulnerability
16(3) Political oversight of budget process
- Executive responsible for policy and
prioritisation ensured by MTEF budget process - Manage the tension between competing policy
priorities and budget realities - Improve legislative oversight through JBC, SCOPA
Trade-off between extending child support grant
to children lt 14 years or increase spending on
school books, or can both be accommodated within
approved fiscal framework
17(4) Budgeting for service delivery
- MTEF deepens medium to long-term certainty
- Budget certainty supports policy for the
phasing-in of CSG - Allows for medium-term reprioritisation
- Legislative reforms provide manager with greater
flexibility accountability for use of resources - Budget documents contain service delivery
commitments - IGFR, ENE, Appropriation Bill, DoRA, Budget
Review - Measurable objectives and output targets included
in national and provincial budgets
18Future challenges
- Better formulation of service delivery
objectives, outputs and targets - Better use of existing documents
- Legislatures
- SAHRC
- Public
- Improving monitoring and evaluation systems
- Strengthening the accountability cycle
- Aligning strategic plans, budgets and annual
reports - Performance agreements of line-managers