Project Portfolio Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Project Portfolio Management

Description:

One 3 hour meeting with all company Vice Presidents and President/CEO ... A good amount of cleanup is required on this list after the meeting (deleting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: tracey59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project Portfolio Management


1
Project Portfolio Management
  • The beauty of portfolio management is that
    ultimately, the prioritization process will allow
    you to fund the projects that most closely align
    with your companys strategic objectives

2
Why?
  • Align IT resources with business objectives
  • Build strong IT governance structure
  • Ensure proper executive business support of IT
    projects
  • Maximize IT investments
  • Reduce of redundant projects
  • Make it easier to cancel projects
  • Set expectations
  • Develop IT plan and IT budget

3
Steps to Successful Project Portfolio Management
  • There is no single right way to do portfolio
    management.

4
Steps
1
  • Gather a detailed inventory of all projects
  • Set strategic objectives for the company
  • Align projects with objectives
  • Score and categorize projects
  • Actively manage portfolio

2
3
4
IT Plan, Budget
5
5
Inventory of Projects
Software upgrades New systems Policy
changes Product development Internal
controls Workflow automation Infrastructure Facili
ties
1
  • Some companies using PPM, begin with taking a
    complete inventory of current requested projects.
  • Other companies benefit from starting from
    scratch with the process and require that all
    projects be re-requested and re-assessed through
    PPM.
  • This presentation outlines the process for
    starting from the beginning with all projects
    being requested as new and therefore we skip to
    the next step Set Strategic Objectives.

6
Set Strategic Objectives
2
  • One 3 hour meeting with all company Vice
    Presidents and President/CEO
  • Operating Plan structure is set at 3 levels
  • Objectives (Why?)
  • Initiatives (What?)
  • Projects (How?)
  • Objectives are brainstormed and decided upon in
    this meeting with all attendees prepared with 3-5
    recommended objectives.
  • Discussion serves as kick-off to next year and a
    chance to openly, informally discuss company
    strategies and challenges.

CEO, CFO, CIO, EVP, VP HR, Division President,
VP Books, VP Journals, VP Reference, VP
Sales/Mktg
7
Set Strategic Objectives
2
8
Set Strategic Objectives
1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
2
  • VPs brainstorm initiatives in support of the
    objectives with direct reports (directors and
    senior managers) within their department.
  • Another 3 hour meeting is held with all VPs and
    direct reports to review all recommended
    initiatives by department. Initiatives are
    discussed and agreed upon in this meeting.
  • A good amount of cleanup is required on this list
    after the meeting (deleting duplicates, merging
    similar initiatives, etc.
  • Finalized list is distributed to all VPs and
    direct reports (now referred to as the Operating
    Plan Team).
  • Involvement of direct reports at this level
    serves the purpose of generating early buy in to
    the Operating Plan process by senior management.

9

1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
2
Set Strategic Objectives
10
Align Projects
1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
3
  • Department VPs and their direct reports are
    responsible for recommending projects that will
    support each initiative in alignment with the
    company objectives.
  • Each senior manager must enter recommended
    projects into the Operating Plan system. Only VP
    approved projects are entered into the system,
    cutting down drastically on frivolous project
    requests.
  • Each project entry requires a high level
    justification including project description,
    business benefits, executive sponsor, business
    manager, estimated quarter of completion, etc.
  • The projects are then turned over to IT to assign
    IT owners and estimate costs for all projects
    requiring IT support.
  • All proposed projects are then reviewed in
    individual departmental meetings chaired by the
    CIO, CFO and EVP with attendees being the
    department VP and their direct reports.
  • Department VPs and direct reports are given this
    opportunity to introduce the project and sell
    it to the chairs for approval.

!
11

1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
3
Align Projects
Objective
Initiative
Projects
12
Score Projects
1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
4
  • During the project review meetings, each project
    is assessed based on strength of support for
    initiative/objective, estimated business
    benefits, and estimated costs.
  • As a closing to the discussion on each project,
    the project is assigned a status and an action
    level.
  • The action level is assigned first and drives the
    status and next steps, as outlined below
  • Action Level Status Next Steps
  • Start Project Accepted Begin projects in order
    of priority
  • Start after validation Proposed Begin validation
    process
  • More research needed Proposed Continue research
    and propose again
  • Unlikely to start this year Proposed Hold
    (candidate for Q4 if resources allow)
  • Do not start this year Deferred Hold for next
    year and propose again

Validation refers to a more in-depth
cost/benefit analysis required of the business
owner before a project is formally accepted or
deferred
13
Page 1 of Project Proposal Form in Operating Plan
System
14
Page 2 of Project Proposal Form in Operating Plan
System
Status Proposed Accepted Deferred (All project
requests default to proposed. Only Department
VPs can change this field)
Assigned by IT
Action Level 1 Start Project 2 Start after
validation 3 More research needed 4 Unlikely
to start this year 5 Do not start this year
15
IT Plan and Budget
1.Objective 2.Initiative 3.Project
4.5
  • After all projects are reviewed and scored, the
    Department VPs are tasked with prioritizing all
    action level 1 and 2 projects for their
    department. The priorities are simply high,
    medium and low.
  • The Operating Plan is then handed over to IT to
    schedule all action level 1 and 2 projects that
    require IT support into the four quarters of the
    year with estimated start and complete quarters.
    This scheduling is based on priority and action
    level with the high priority, action level 1
    projects at the top. IT resource leveling is done
    at this time.
  • This schedule is the first draft of the IT plan
    for the coming year. It is then tweaked as
    needed when looked at on paper for anomalies,
    special considerations, etc. This schedule will
    also become the basis for the IT budget.

16
Actively Manage Portfolio
5
Portfolio Management without governance is an
empty concept
  • Monthly IT Steering Committee (ITSC) chaired by
    CIO. Members of committee include CEO, CFO and
    EVP. All other VPs attend as needed based on
    agenda of items to be discussed.
  • Purpose of committee
  • Business owners and department VPs present
    projects requiring validation before approval.
    ITSC approves or denies these projects.
  • Monthly status given on large-scale, strategic IT
    projects from the Operating Plan.
  • Provides forum for strategic IT spending
    decisions and updates on critical system
    issues/concerns.
  • Provides forum for reprioritizing projects based
    on mid-year changes in company priorities/strategi
    es.

17
Actively Manage Portfolio
5
  • Quarterly review of entire Operating Plan at
    standing Executive Committee meetings. All VPs
    are required to give status of initiatives and
    projects quarterly.
  • Quarterly review by CEO of high-level Operating
    Plan at Board of Directors Meetings.

18
Hurdles to Portfolio Management
  • Democracy aint easy

19
Hurdles
  • Team Many executives are initially
    uncomfortable having their decisions scrutinized.
    It requires real teamwork at the executive level
    to support portfolio management and governance.
    Executive buy-in is absolutely required up front.
  • Complexity The desire to overcomplicate this
    process with complex scoring and red tape is
    overwhelming. Keep it simple at first then
    improve upon the process as participants become
    familiar with the steps.
  • Software Do not rely on project portfolio
    management tools to manage this process for you.
    No one tool does everything and many tools
    complicate the process. Sage wrote their own
    tool in an attempt to keep it simple.
  • Time This requires an additional time commitment
    from executives above and beyond their usual
    constraints. Coming to meetings prepared is the
    key to keeping this process time sensitive.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com