Scaling of impurity Ne - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Scaling of impurity Ne

Description:

i) Neon injected in MHD quiescent high-b, high confinement H-modes. ii) The main diagnostic used was the 'multi-color' optical SXR array. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: luisfdelga
Learn more at: https://nstx.pppl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Scaling of impurity Ne


1
Scaling of impurity (Ne Ar) transport in beam
heated NSTX H-mode discharges
  • L. F. Delgado-Aparicio, D. Stutman, K. Tritz, and
    M. Finkenthal
  • The Johns Hopkins University, The Plasma
    Spectroscopy Group
  • R. E. Bell, R. Kaita, S. Kaye, B. P. LeBlanc, S.
    Paul,
  • L. Roquemore and D. Smith
  • Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
  • F. Levinton, H. YuhNOVA Photonics, Inc.

NSTX, results meeting Monday, July 22,
2007 Princeton, New Jersey, USA
2
Abstract
  • Motivation
  • Perform particle transport studies in high
    (Power b) performance
  • NSTX H-modes, important for NSTX and the
    next-step ST.
  • DZ (diffusion) vZ (convective velocity)
  • Identify regimes with possible impurity
    screening (vZgt0).
  • r scaling at fixed q-profile,
  • Ip and Bf scaling
  • Experiment
  • i) Neon injected in MHD quiescent high-b,
    high confinement H-modes.
  • ii) The main diagnostic used was the
    multi-color optical SXR array.
  • iii) B Ip scanned at fixed q-profile for
    r scaling experiments.

3
Experimental requirements and issues during XP 716
  • Experimental requirements
  • Sources A B _at_ 90 kV, and source C _at_ 70 kV
  • Turn of source C _at_ 300 ms
  • Impurity injection _at_ 350 ms
  • Issues during XP 716
  • Source B had to be turned off. Worked at 4 MW
    with sources A C
  • Multiple ELMs and possible inboard MARFE
    activity
  • Try to reduce the ELM activity by changing the
    CS fueling
  • MHD activity in 5.5 kG shots
  • H-mode ? L-mode ? H-mode (change timings)
  • Impossible to achieve good conditions _at_ 0.8 MA ?
    0.9 MA
  • Control access for TVPS PLC
  • Failed to open shutters (TIVs) for good Ar
    injection!

4
Neon injection at 4.5 kG and 1.0 MA (121032
121031)
Did MHD e.g. ELMs, MARFEs or (m,n) modes
shield the core from impurities?
Neon, t?400,406ms
CORE MID-RADIUS EDGE
5
Argon injection at 4.5 kG and 1.0 MA (121036
121035)
Argon, t?400,410ms
CORE MID-RADIUS EDGE
6
Neon injection at 5.5 kG and 1.0 MA (121017
121015)
Neon, t?350,360ms
CORE MID-RADIUS EDGE
7
Neon injection at 5.5 kG and 1.2 MA (121030
121029)
  • Background H-L-H-mode conditions _at_ 390 ms. tE
    and Sn increased strongly when in L-mode
  • Neon seeded Do not have the H-L-H transitions.
    tE and Sn increased when gas is injected!

Neon, t?420,430ms
CORE MID-RADIUS EDGE
MHD
8
Future work
  • Invert line-integrated data to obtain SXR
    emissivity profiles.
  • Run MIST code. Possible need of time-dependent
    (DZ VZ) analysis.
  • Establish (if possible) impurity scaling at 4.5
    kG and 1.0 MA.
  • Investigate the role of MHD and ELMs in
    shielding the core.
  • Study the transport reduction at high current
    during the Ip scaling (5.5 kG 1.0 MA vs. 5.5 kG
    1.2 MA)
  • Find out why tE and Sn increased when gas was
    injected.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com