MultiModel ENSO Prediction with CFS and CCSM3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MultiModel ENSO Prediction with CFS and CCSM3

Description:

Multi-Model Methodologies Are a Practical Approach to Quantifying Forecast ... No Determination of Which Model is 'Better' - Depends on Lead ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: benki
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MultiModel ENSO Prediction with CFS and CCSM3


1
Multi-Model ENSO Prediction with CFS and CCSM3
  • Ben Kirtman
  • University of Miami-RSMAS
  • Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA)

Acknowledgement Dughong Min
2
Why?
  • Multi-Model Methodologies Are a Practical
    Approach to Quantifying Forecast Uncertainty Due
    to Uncertainty in Model Formulation
  • And, Apparently Improve Forecast Quality
  • US National Multi-Model Capability
  • Results with CCSM3 Encouraging
  • Use Existing Operational Analyses for
    Initialization (CFSRR for Retrospective Forecasts)

No Determination of Which Model is Better -
Depends on Lead- Time and Start Month and the
Debate is Counter Productive
3
Outline
  • Mean Simulation Errors
  • Annual Mean
  • ENSO Simulation Errors
  • Forecast Quality
  • Forecast Initialization
  • Nino3.4 Forecast Assessment
  • Random Thoughts

4
Equatorial Pacific SST
OISST
CFS
CCSM
5
Equatorial Pacific SST Variance
CFS
OISST
CCSM
6
Forecast Initialization
  • Atmosphere-Land-Sea Ice Initialization via AMIP
    e.g., No Observational Data
  • GFDL MOM3 Ocean Data Assimilation Interpolated to
    CCSM3 (POP)
  • Number of Technical Issues
  • Future Use CFSRR and Operational Analysis

7
Nino3.4 Multi-Model Forecast Assessment
  • Initial Conditions
  • CFS 5-Member Ensembles, December 30-January 3
    (ODA-January 1) 1982-1998
  • CCSM3 6-Member Ensembles January 1 1982-1998
  • Similarly with April and July Starts
  • Multi-Model Better than Random Numbers?
  • Monte-Carlo Red-Noise Simulations
  • Multi-Model Better then Just More Ensemble
    Members?
  • All Possible 5-Member Ensembles
  • Are We Resolving the PDF Better?

8
January Cases
9
January Starts Nino3.4 Systematic Evolution
OISST
CFS
CCSM3
10
(No Transcript)
11
Is Multi-Model Better than Noise?
Noise Red Noise with Same Variance and Lag-1
Autocorrelation
12
Lead Time 5-Months
Model B
AB
Model A
ANoise
13
Is Multi-Model Better than Just a Larger Ensemble?
Consider All Possible 6-Member Ensembles with at
Least 2-Ensemble Members from Model A and Model B
14
5-Member Model B
5-Member AB
5-Member Model A
Lead Time 5-Months
15
(No Transcript)
16
Nino3.4 Estimated PDFs Lead-Time 5 Months
Observations
CFS
CCSM3
CFSCCM3
17
Nino3.4 Conditional PDFs Lead-Time 5 Months
Obs 0.5
CCSM Obs 0.5
CFS Obs 0.5
CFSCCSM Obs 0.5
18
Nino3.4 Conditional PDFs Lead-Time 5 Months
CFS Obs Obs CCSM Obs CFSCCSM Obs 19
Random Thoughts
  • Multi-Model is Promising
  • Generally (but not always) Better Forecast
    Quality
  • More Than Just a Larger Ensemble
  • Dont Need to Ask Which Model is Better?
  • Livezey Question Does it Matter?
  • In Practice Multi-Model is Ad-Hoc
  • Orthogonal Skill
  • Only Two Models
  • Initialization
  • Land, Atmosphere
  • CFSRR
  • Multi-Model Should not be Used as an Excuse to
    Avoid Model Improvement

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com