Forming a Triangulated Grid of a 3D Fracture Network PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forming a Triangulated Grid of a 3D Fracture Network


1
Forming a Triangulated Grid of a 3D Fracture
Network
  • Dr Michael Robins UWA CWR Sept 04

2
3-Phase NAPL Transport Model
Ref D.Reynolds and B.Kueper 2001
3
Fracture Networks
Three dimensions
Ref Reynolds Kueper 2003
4
Cross section of 3D Fracture Network
5
Representation of fractures as discs
a
  • position (x,y,z)
  • radius r
  • orientation (u,v,w)
  • aperture a

(u,v,w)
z
r
y
x
6
Fracture network is formed by intersecting discs
7
Triangulation of a set of vertices
8
Delaunay Triangulation
  • No vertices within circumcircle of triangles
  • Many algorithms
  • Incremental refinement
  • Sweep line
  • Divide and conquer
  • Good for numerical models
  • Constrained by Planar Straight Line Graphs
  • Conform to angle or area restrictions

9
Triangulation of Discs
Delaunay Triangulation
Conforming Delaunay angle and area limits
10
Triangulation of intersecting discs
Constrained conforming Delaunay triangulation
  • Planar Straight Line Graph
  • Intersections must be included
  • Steiner points may be added along line segments
  • Added points must exist in both intersected discs

11
Triangle data structures
  • Vertex
  • position
  • Triangle
  • vertices
  • neighbours
  • adjacent edges
  • Edge
  • colinear neighbours
  • adjacent triangles
  • Triangles and Edges
  • handled or grasped relative to several
    orientations

Ref J. R. Shewchuk, 2002
12
The Intersecting disc problem
  • For a huge collection of seemingly
    randomly oriented, sized and positioned discs
  • Form a triangulated network of vertices that lie
    on the disks and intersections
  • Solution must suit parallel computation
  • Novelty lies in the requirement that
    inserted vertices along the intersection
    (Steiner points) must be present at
    corresponding places in both discs

13
2½ Dimension Triangulation
  • A disc is a 12 sided polygon not a circle
  • Triangulation problem is 2 dimensional
  • Discs are flat therefore intersections are
    striaght
  • Various overlaps but all intersect the boundary
    of one disc or the other
  • Difficulty lies in identifying shared points of
    intersecting discs
  • Work in 2D as much as possible

14
Robust Arithmetic
  • Calculations performed using floating point
  • Limited numerical precision of the computer
  • The solution must be unambiguous
  • Problems are inconsistencies of data structures
    and triangles, eg negative areas etc.
  • Shewchuks robust math routines perform
    calculations to increasing precision until result
    is unambiguous

15
Discus program to triangulate intersecting discs
  • Represent each disc as 2D vertices
  • Shared vertices along intersections
  • Represented as both 3D locations
  • And corresponding points calculated in frame of
    reference of each disc
  • Shared vertices are tagged with the same id.
  • By using separate 2D representations, all the
    triangulation difficulties are already dealt with
    by Shewchuks algorithms

16
How to calculate the intersections
foreach disc determine a bounding box sort all
discs by Lowest, Closest, Leftmost bounding
point Repeat with the first_disc remaining in
the sorted list read discs while disc.Lowest
ClosestLeft gt first_disc.HighestFarthestRight fo
reach disc read compare bounding boxes of
disc with first_disc foreach intersecting
boxes check if the discs actually
intersect write out first_disc and its
intersections until all discs have been examined
Avoid excessinve comparisions by keeping lists
of previously considered pairings
17
Check if and where two specific discs intersect
calculate the line of intersection of the discs
planes from orientation norms and centre
points translate the line into the frame of
reference of each disc see if the line
intersects and boundary segments of the
disc this yields 4 points (2 or 3 in degenerate
cases) determine the overlap and the two shared
vertices or no intersection create the Planar
Straight Line Graph for each disc
18
Additional considerations
  • Three discs intersect at a point
  • Additional shared vertex needs to be inserted
    into the PSLG of each disc
  • Three discs intersect along a line and
    intersecting intersections may form acute angles
  • Want to merge some shared vertices and realign
    structures slightly
  • Tangential intersections
  • Can be considered as no connection
  • Boundary of the domain
  • Post processing step to cut the triangulation

19
Frame of reference for a disc
  • Arbitrarily formed by
  • Shifting the disc to the origin
  • Rotating about the line z0
  • Lie the disc flat in the xy plane
  • Transform is unique for each disc
  • Disc then formed in xy coordinates
  • 12 vertices in 2D

20
Forming a 3D unstructured grid of a fracture
network
  • Transforming the private vertices of the discs
    into 3D
  • Restore their connectivity
  • Connect all the shared vertices (already in 3D)
    to respective nodes
  • Note how the shared vertices provide the entire
    linkage of discs to each other

21
Triangulation with shared verticesongoing work
  • Delaunay Triangulation requires insertion of
    Steiner points along intersections.
  • Any such insertion must be shared.
  • The Delaunay and Constrained Delaunay algorithms
    tend to work by successive refinement
  • Postulate that insertion of shared vertices can
    be coordinated between separate triangulation
    processes
  • The algorithm would seem to suit parallel
    implementation
  • natural and reasonably minimal communication
    patterns

22
Tools
  • C language triangle.c, robust.c and
    mytriangle.c
  • Python a handy scripting language
  • Generating or manipulating data files
  • Prototype algorithm development
  • Mayavi Python based visualization tool
  • Vtk visualization toolkit
  • Open source, used by Mayavi

23
Conclusion
  • Have determined the algorithm and equations
  • Partially implemented transforms and
    triangulation
  • Data structures lead to difficulties debugging
  • Visualization tools are proving useful

24
Bibliography
  • David A. Reynolds and Bernard H. Kueper,
    Multiphase flow and transport in fractured clay /
    sand sequences, J. Contaminant Hydrology 51(2001)
    pp. 41-62, 2001
  • David A. Reynolds and Bernard H. Kueper,
    Effective constitutive properties for dense
    nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) migration in
    large fracture networks A computational study,
    Water Resources Research, 39(9), 2003
  • Jonathan Richard Shewchuk, Delaunay Refinement
    Algorithms for Triangular Mesh Generation,
    Computational Geometry Theory and Applications
    22(1-3)21-74, May 2002.
  • Marshall Bern and David Eppstein, Mesh Generation
    and Optimal Triangulation, pp. 23-90 of Computing
    in Euclidean Geometry, Ding-Zhu Du and Frank
    Hwang (editors), World Scientific, Singapore,
    1992.
  • Jim Ruppert, A Delaunay Refinement Algorithm for
    Quality 2-Dimensional Mesh Generation, Journal of
    Algorithms 18(3)548-585, May 1995.
  • L. Paul Chew, Guaranteed-Quality Mesh Generation
    for Curved Surfaces, Proceedings of the Ninth
    Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (San
    Diego, California), pages 274-280, Association
    for Computing Machinery, May 1993.
  • Marshall Bern, David Eppstein, and John R.
    Gilbert, Provably Good Mesh Generation, Journal
    of Computer and System Sciences 48(3)384-409,
    June 1994.
  • Jonathan Richard Shewchuk, Adaptive Precision
    Floating-Point Arithmetic and Fast Robust
    Geometric Predicates, Discrete Computational
    Geometry 18305-363, 1997.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com