Construction of the Public Sector Comparator

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Construction of the Public Sector Comparator

Description:

Long list produced, then subjected to standard Option Appraisal ... PSC (preferred option) costed on best practice public sector design and construction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: dh482

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Construction of the Public Sector Comparator


1
Construction of the Public Sector Comparator Andy
Stubbings, Private Finance Unit PPPs / Regional
Government of Madrid 3 March 2006
2
Background
  • Financial Consultant in the Private Finance Unit
  • Team of 14 legal and financial consultants,
    working closely with a team of civil servants
    responsible for
  • reviewing and approving business cases for new
    investment
  • helping develop and implement PFI policy in
    health
  • managing the health PFI market
  • advising on specialist legal and financial
    issues.
  • Specialisms risk, payment mechanism, commercial
    issues and funding.

3
Introduction
  • PFI has been used in the UK Health Sector for
    about 10 years
  • A total of 79 schemes have reached financial
    close with a capital value of 9.2 bn
  • Period marked by continual evolution
  • Standard contract
  • Increasing standardisation of performance
    standards
  • Increasing understanding of risk transfer.
  • PFI now a familiar procurement tool

4
Focus of Presentation
  • PFI must continue to evolve in the light of
    experience
  • Greater emphasis on using PFI when it is right to
    do so
  • Requirement to assess affordability and value for
    money early
  • This has implications for
  • How and when we use the Public Sector Comparator
    (PSC) and
  • how it is constructed.

5
The Public Sector Comparator (PSC)
  • Costed public sector solution to deliver a
    projects output specifications
  • Adjusted to take into account an estimate of the
    risks that would be assumed by the private sector
  • Used as the basis for assessments of value for
    money and affordability at various stages of a
    project
  • Based on the entire life of the asset (60 years)
  • Expresses the value for money of a project in a
    single figure, or Net Present Cost (NPC)

6
Overview of Business Case Approval
  • Three key stages
  • Strategic Outline Case (SOC) broad analysis of
    need
  • Outline Business Case (OBC) more detailed
    option appraisal, identification of preferred
    option prior to approaching the market. PSC
    developed from the preferred option
  • Full Business Case (FBC) comprehensive summary
    of the procurement and basis for DH and HM
    Treasury approval

7
Approach to PSC
  • New guidance issued by HM Treasury, August 2004
  • More work done at OBC
  • Rigorous costing of the PSC
  • Early quantitative analysis
  • Standard model for comparing NPCs of PFI and the
    PSC
  • Coupled with an assessment of viability,
    desirability and achievability
  • No further quantitative work after OBC
  • Strong competition and benchmarking used to
    assure value for money thereafter

8
Working up the preferred option
  • Services and capacity health needs and
    developments
  • Estate options rebuild, refurbishment, other
    sites
  • Long list produced, then subjected to standard
    Option Appraisal
  • Resulting short list then costed
  • Whole life costs discounted to give NPCs
  • Based on use of public capital
  • Qualitative assessment of risks and benefits
  • Lowest costs per benefit point preferred option

9
Costing the preferred option as the PSC (1)
  • Saying what we need in terms of
  • Developing a more detailed design brief covering
    quality, design vision and clinical
    functionality
  • Developing more detailed operational policies for
    clinical and non-clinical services
  • Specifying standards that will have a material
    impact on cost e.g. room sizes, circulation
    space, performance, engineering and construction
  • Objective to be clearer about what we want, but
    not prescriptive about how it is delivered.

10
Costing the preferred option as the PSC (2)
  • Translating design and service requirements into
    costs
  • Build Standards Health Building Notices (HBNs)
  • Capital costs for given units e.g. wards,
    theatres assembled from Departmental Cost
    Advisory Guides
  • Inflation standard index issued for tender
    price inflation in the public sector
  • Norms for maintenance, operation and lifecycle
    costs, modified according to standards required
  • Objective to obtain a more realistic assessment
    of affordability before going to market.

11
Risk and the PSC (1)
  • PSC (preferred option) costed on best practice
    public sector design and construction
  • PSC therefore adjusted according to standard risk
    template and methodology
  • Risk that costs are underestimated addressed by
    Optimism Bias
  • Risk transfer quantified
  • Cost estimates and risk assumptions must be
    tested by sensitivity analysis
  • Objective improving the quality of assumptions,
    but recognising their limitations.

12
Risk and the PSC (2)
  • Points regarding Risk Transfer
  • National Audit Office and Public Accounts
    Committee feedback
  • No longer based on scheme specific estimates
  • Based on standard assumptions for the sector
  • Deviations from assumptions have to be justified
  • Highly sensitive assumptions will be subject to
    review
  • Heavy emphasis on sensitivity analysis
  • Output is basis for quantified risk adjustment
  • Objective assessment of risk informed by
    experience.

13
How do we use the PSC (1)?
  • At OBC to
  • Assess whether PFI should be the procurement
    route to follow qualitatively based on past
    experience
  • Assess whether PFI is suitable quantitatively
    using a standard model to compare estimated PFI
    and PSC NPCs before going to market
  • Assess affordability better, using more detailed
    costing

14
How do we use the PSC (2)?
  • After OBC
  • No further quantitative analysis required
  • PSC only revised to reflect genuine changes in
    scope, not private sector innovation
  • Some usefulness in benchmarking
  • Some parts of the PSC may be used for briefing
    the private sector
  • Update of qualitative factors at FBC

15
What have we learned?
  • PFI has proven benefits for certain types of
    procurement, but not all types of procurement
  • Early and detailed costing provides a better
    indicator of affordability
  • If you can explain what you want, you are likely
    to get a better solution
  • Qualitative risk assessment should not be
    over-emphasised
  • A better PSC helps avoid wasting both public and
    private sector time, resources and cash
  • Approval to be concentrated earlier in
    procurement

16
  • Questions

17
Links to useful documents
DH Value for Money Guidance http//www.dh.gov.uk
/ProcurementAndProposals/PublicPrivatePartnership/
PrivateFinanceInitiative/PFIArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_
ID4120015chkt/sbV9 Costing Design Guidance
for PSCs http//www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStat
istics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/
PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT
_ID4122632chkxfkAF7 Links to Standard Output
Specifications for Services http//www.dh.gov.uk/
ProcurementAndProposals/PublicPrivatePartnership/P
rivateFinanceInitiative/NewStandardOutputSpecifica
tions/NewStandardOutputSpecificationsArticle/fs/en
?CONTENT_ID4016183chkC32BBiQ
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)