Title: Firm Valuations and Real Options
1Firm Valuations and Real Options
- The Shutdown Decision in Chapter 11
2The Shutdown Decision in Chapter 11
- A firm enters Chapter 11 as an operating business
- At one or more points, someone asks the judge to
pull the plug - How should the judge approach this question?
3The Shutdown Decision in Chapter 11
- Timing is everything
- Shut down the firm too soon, and a viable
business is lost forever - Wait too long, and you have made a bad situation
worse
4The Shutdown Decision in Chapter 11
- Judges must make the right decision at the right
time - The judge is exercising what economists call a
real option - This real options idea should be incorporated
into net present value calculations - It provides a powerful intuition for analyzing
many issues in Chapter 11
5Measuring Present Value
- Casual net present value calculations assume that
you have to make an up-or-down decision today - The ability to wait itself affects the net
present value calculations in Chapter 11 and
elsewhere
6Hypo
Creditors 100
Debtor Firm
We can sell the assets for 100.
If we operate
7Should We Liquidate the Firm?
- Casual Net Present Value Calculation
- Assume 10 Interest Rate
8Wrong! Ignores Choices and Benefits of More Info
- Try a Different Approach
- Key Assumption After operating one period, firm
can still be liquidated for 100 - Operating does not reduce liquidation value
- Think of perhaps real estate or intellectual
property
9Better NPV Calculation
10Controlling Timing v. Now-or-Never Decisions
- The Now-or-Never Decision
- Liquidate Now with NPV of 100
- The Value of a One-Period Option to Wait
- 4.54
- By operating the firm for one period, we increase
PV by 4.54 - We gain info, and learn whether the firm can
succeed
11From The Paper
- Some firms should be kept intact even though the
expected earnings of the firm over time are less
than the cash that can be realized from the
piecemeal sale of its assets today.
12Core Idea
- Sample operations to try to grab the high end
of the distribution and, if not, exit to
liquidation - Sampling requires waiting
- Waiting is costly, even when the assets dont
decline in value - But uncertainty makes some waiting desirable
13Searching for the Perfect Cup of Coffee
Store B
Store C
Store A
Store D
We know, but X doesnt know, that the coffee is
worth at A 10, B 9, C 8, D 7
Price for Coffee 6
X knows distribution of values It costs X 1 to
visit a store Return to store for free
14What Should X Do?
- X should go to at least one store
- Worst outcome is find coffee worth 7
- Pay 6 for coffee 1 for search and break even
- 3 of 4 times find coffee worth 8, 9 or 10 and do
better than that
15When Should X Stop?
- X finds A in 1st Search
- Suppose X stumbles on to A in her first search
and finds coffee worth 10 - X cannot do better than A
- She should should stop, pay 6, plus 1 search
cost, and be 3 to the good
16Suppose X finds B in 1st Search
- X has coffee worth 9 in hand
- X could only do better by finding store A, with
coffee worth 10 - She would have to pay 1 to look again, and could
gain only 1, and 2/3 of the time she will not
find A on her next search - X should stop if she finds B in her first search
17Suppose X finds C in 1st Search
- X has coffee worth 8 in hand
- X could only do better by finding store A or B,
with coffee worth 10 or 9 - The cost of another search is 1
- The expected gain is (1/3) x 2 (1/3) x 1
(1/3) x 0 1 - She is indifferent between searching and not
searching?
18Wrong!
- After we find D on the second search, we know
where A and B are and have the option to search
again. - Once we know C and D, the expected gain from
searching is (1/2) x 2 (1/2) x 1 1.5 - The cost is 1, so the expected net gain from the
search is 0.5 - So our calculation for C is (1/3) x 2 (1/3) x
1 (1/3) x 0.50 1.16 against a cost of 1,
so we should search again if we find C on the
first search
19Suppose X find D in 1st Search
- X has coffee worth 7 in hand
- X knows she will do better by going to another
store. - The cost of another search is 1
- The expected gain is (1/3) x 3 (1/3) x 2
(1/3) x ??? gt 1 - X should should look again if she finds D
20Search Rule So Far
- Undertake first search
- If find A or B, stop
- If find C or D, search again
21The Rest of the Search Rule
- After Finding C or D in First Search, in Second
Search - If X finds A or B, stop.
- If X finds C or D, expected gain from further
search is (1/2) x 2 (1/2) x 1 or 1.5, so search
again - After Finding C or D in Second Search, after
Third Search - Stop
22Tying this to Bankruptcy and Shutdown Decisions
- The bankruptcy judge is presented with a proposed
disposition of the assets of the estate - What is the likely distribution of better
proposals? - What is the cost of considering each proposal?
- When should the judge stop considering proposals?
23Pricing the Option to Wait
- We wait to learn if we are certain, there is
nothing to learn, and no reason to wait - The more uncertaintythe more volatilityassociate
d with the operations of the firm, the more
valuable it is to wait - The Black-Scholes Option Pricing Formula gives us
a formal way to value real options - But we dont have the same amount of information
that exists for financial options
24Real Options in Chapter 11
- What is the use of real options, given this
absence of information? - We become more cautious about simple NPV
valuations - We have a different benchmark by which to look at
the shutdown decision
25Real Options in Chapter 11
- How long should a bankruptcy judge take to decide
whether to shut a firm down? - The Morrison Conjecture
- Real options, when sensibly exercised, leave a
distinct footprint - The shutdown decisions of good bankruptcy judges
should follow the same pattern
26The Footprint of a Real Option
- How long do you stay in a job before looking for
something better? - At the start, you dont know enough to stop
- As you continue, you get more and more
information - The job is bad and is not getting better
- The job is great and other jobs are not going to
be better
27The Footprint of a Real Option
- It doesnt make sense to quit until you have
enough information - As time goes on, you know more and more
- After a certain point, you know enough so that if
you have not left already, you arent going to
28The Footprint of a Real Option
- We can translate this idea to a graph
- The number of people who quit their new jobs is
low initially - It rises as they learn more
- It then falls as the only people left are those
who like the job. - The graph is hump-shaped
- The middle of the hump is the average amount of
time it takes to learn whether the job is right
for you
29The Footprint of a Real Option
- This patternthis inverted U-shaped graphcan be
observed empirically when real options are
sensibly exercised - The Morrison Conjecture
- We should find the same pattern in shutdown
decisions - The hump in the graph should peak at 3 months
30Why Three Months?
- In assessing a firm and its prospects, the
bankruptcy judge gathering information in the
same way as an auctioneer - Auctioneers of firms take about three months to
orchestrate a sale - The reorganization regime in Sweden uses auctions
and they take place in about 3 months on average - The Bankruptcy Code itself posits that a plan can
be assembled with 120 days
31The Morrison Conjecture
Probability of Shutdown
Months in Chapter 11
5
10
15
32Reality Check
- Survey of Chapter 11 in N.D. Ill. (Eastern
Division) - Corporations
- Operating at time of petition
- Filing in calendar year 1998
33The Morrison Conjecture
Probability of Shutdown
Months in Chapter 11
5
10
15
34The Baird-Morrison-Picker Conjecture
Probability of Shutdown
Months in Chapter 11
5
10
15
35Cumulative Shutdowns
100
Firms Shutdown
50
Months in Chapter 11
15
5
10
36The Real Options Approach to Chapter 11
- Standard critiques of Chapter 11 ask how long
they take and how many succeed - The real options approach says that this is wrong
- If the shutdown decision is made sensibly, the
losers are dismissed quickly at low cost - The firms that remain in Chapter 11 after a few
months are winners
37The Real Options Approach to Chapter 11
- A Chapter 11 regime in which only a few firms
emerge intact may be good if shutdown decisions
are made well - Failures are OK if they are quick
- The time it takes matters less if chances of
success are high
38Firms with Debt Over 1 Million
39Fate of Reorganized Firms
40Do Judges Use Stochastic Calculus?
- How do bankruptcy judges actually make shutdown
decisions? - The bankruptcy judge uses different rules of
thumb - These are all different ways of asking, Have I
seen enough to know that this firm isnt going to
make it?
41Rules of Thumb
- 13 OClock Rule
- Cash-Flow Rule
- Three Strikes (Maybe Two) and Youre Out
- Meeting Milestones
- The Company You Keep
42What Firms Reorganize Successfully in Chapter 11?
- There must be a sound core business.
- A well-established firm that has experienced a
one-time shock is likely to succeed. - New businesses and those that cant meet new
competition are not.
43Why couldnt you reach a deal outside of Chapter
11?
- A firm with only one large institutional creditor
is less likely to succeed. - A firm with non-financial judgment creditors and
tax collectors is.
44Filings (by firm type)
45Precipitating Event
46Real Options in Action
- There are many different motions, brought by many
different parties that implicate the shutdown
decision. - But all of them raise the same set of questions
47Real Options in Action
- Consider a standard scenario
- The operating statement shows a negative cash
flow for your debtor - The U.S. Trustee brings a motion to dismiss
- What is the judge thinking as you start to make
your argument?
48Real Options in Action
- Viable businesses dont keep losing money
- If things dont change, I have to grant this
motion (or another one just like it) sooner or
later - I dont want to find myself here a month from now
doing then what I can do now - Unless this guy can tell me what is going to
change, I might as well grant the motion now