Title: Keynes
1Keyness revolving fund the Circuit
2One step forward, two steps back?
- Circuitist non-commodity money, 3-cornered
exchange fundamental advance on Keynes - But School beset by dilemmas
- Losses in Circuit
- Destruction of Money
- Dilemma of profit how can M become M? (Rochon
2004 125) - Keynes 1937 saw no such dilemmas
- If investment is proceeding at a steady rate,
the finance required can be supplied from a
revolving fund of a more or less constant amount - How to reconcile Keynes the Circuitists?
- And the Accommodationists Structuralists
3Model Circuit Dynamically
- Circuit fundamentally a dynamic process
- Attempts to model to date have been either
- Single period accommodationist Simple, but
- Change occurs between periods, out of time
- Comparative statics links periods
- Multi-period structuralist Too complex to
model? - practical need to often rely on comparative
statics exercises rather than full-blown dynamic
experiments (Fontana 2004 381). - Comparative statics is the problemnot the
Circuit! - Need truly dynamic approach to analysis
- Systems dynamics Differential equations
- Not difference equations
- Distorted time delays
- Analytic stock/flow confusion still possible
4Model Circuit Dynamically
- Starting point Grazianis key insights
- Money a tokenpure credit system
- Three agents minimum
- Seignorage cannot be possible
- Minimum of 5 accounts needed
- Two for capitalist
- One to record debt KD, other to store money KC
- One for worker
- Receive spend wages WY
- Two for Bank
- One for principal production/repayment BP
- One for rentier income spending interest margin
BY
5Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Capitalist Credit (KC)
- Credit Money paid in here
- Interest on balance
- Repayments out of here to Banker
- Capitalist Debt (KD)
- Debt obligation recorded here
- Interest on balance
- Banker Principal Account (BP)
- Accepts repayment of debt by capitalist
- Banker Income Account (BY)
- Records incoming and outgoing interest payments
- Worker Account (WY) introduced later
- Start at simplest level compound interest
- Capitalist borrows never repays or uses money
6Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Both KC KD start with KD(0)
- KD grows at rate of debt interest rd
- Compound interest, the simplest possible
differential equation
- KC grows at rate of credit interest rc
- BY pockets the difference
- As Circuitists feared, this is the road to ruin
for capitalists - With Loan L100 (million billion), rd5,
rc3, after one year - Capitalists 2 in red
7Modelling endogenous money dynamically
8Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Whod be a capitalist?
- But model isnt complete yet no repayment
9Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Repayment intention to make debt decay
exponentially
- Achieved by adding
- Repayment of interest
- Repayment of capital
- Both amounts come out of capitalist credit
account KC (capitalists only store of funds)
- Repayment of principal to banker principal
account BP
- Interest to banker income account BY already shown
10Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- So (still incomplete) system is
- How does this behave?
- Simulate and find out
- Try RP1
- Picture looks a lot better for capitalists than
without repayment
11Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- But being a capitalist still a losing
proposition - Because production isnt yet modelled
- Capitalists borrow to produce, sell, make a
profit
12Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Whole purpose of production to make profit
- Not physical profit (Bellofiore et al. 2000)
- Must spend to make outflow from KC needed
- Production requires workers
- Must be paid wages (into new account WY)
- Products sold to capitalists, workers, bankers
- Transactions from sale flow to capitalist credit
account (out of BY, WY) - Net revenue generated resolves into either
profits or wages - in proportions of flow of income from production,
wage share profit share 1 - Profit proportion flows back into KC account
13Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Call proportion of outflow that finances
production P
- Fraction (1-p) of this flows to workers as wages
- Fraction p flows back to capitalists as profits
- Workers earn interest too
14Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- First complete (but still simple!) system is
- Simulated as flowchart in systems engineering
software
15Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- After ten years
- Capitalist net debt position negligible
- Almost all net money in BP account
- What about incomes?
- KD, KC, WY, etc. record bank balances
- Entries wWY, bBY, etc. record transactions
between accounts - Incomes are subset of transactions
16Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- Capitalists profit net interest
- These are flows
- Aggregate income generated by initial loan L100
is stock - Integral of these over time
17Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- So initial loan of 100 can generate
- 89 income to capitalists
- 2 to bankers and
- 215 to workers
- (with example parameters)
- Without relending
- All money eventually accumulates in BP activity
ceases - Next extension re-lending
- credit as a revolving fund which can be used
over and over again. (Keynes) - Bankers re-lend proportion B of existing BP
- Amount paid into KC recorded in KD
18Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- System with re-lending is
- Initial loan L can now fund one investment after
another, as Keynes argued
19Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- All accounts stabilize at constant level
- Flow of revolving fund through accounts
generates sustained stream of income for all 3
classes from single initial loan
20Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- With parameter values used, 100 initial loan can
finance - 61 of profit
- 143 of wages and
- 1 of bank income per year
X
X
- Income nets to profitswages the monetized
surplus from production
X
X
X
X
21Modelling endogenous money dynamically
- How can capitalists borrow money make a
profit? dilemma easily solved - So long as income from production exceeds
interest payments on borrowed money!
Interest on debt
Income from production
- Circuitist how can M become M? dilemma a case
of confusing stocks (initial loan) and flows
(incomes, including profits)
22Additional insights from model
- Endogenous money works
- Dont need deposits to make loans (exogenous
money perspective) - instead loans create deposits
- Loans(t) KD(t)
- Deposits(t) KC(t)WY(t)BY(t)
- Amounts identically equal over time
- Bank creates money ab initio
- No need for it to have any assets
- Just need acceptance of its IOUs as money by
third parties
23Additional insights from model
- Deposits destroyed as Loans repaid, not
Moneywhich is conserved - Money a bank asset
- Money(t) KD(t) BP(t)
- Technically, Loans destroyed by returning
Deposits to Banks
24Additional insights from model
- Form of money is either
- Debt by other parties to banks (loansdeposits)
or - Banks unencumbered asset in BP account
(reserves) - Reserves created by repayments of loans
- Reverse of exogenous money perspective (loans
made possible by reserves)
25Next extension creation of new money
- Model so far has single injection of money KD(0)
- In actual economy, new money created endogenously
all the time - How to model here?
- Simplest step banks create new money at rate nm
p.a. - New money generated in Bank Principal account
- New money then loaned to firms
- Recorded as positive entry in credit (money) and
debt account - Subtracted from Bankers Principal account once
paid to capitalists
26Creation of new money
- Model now has growing levels of income over time
27Creation of new money
- All account balances grow over time
28Reconciling Accommodationists Structuralists
Basil
Sheila
Basil
Sheila
- Includes Moores Lines of credit Horizontalism
Basil
Sheila
- And Dows (et al.) structuralist active role
for banks
- Foundation for proper transactions modeling of
Minsky - Behavioral relations replace constant parameters
- Investment expectations generate new money
- Bank rationing controls money reflux
29Conclusion
- Circuitists Keynes correct
- Loan in pure credit system initiates sustained
economic activity - Money in economy endogenously determined
- Debt an essential aspect of capitalist economy
- Apparent dilemmas in Circuitist logic
- how can M become M? (Rochon 2004 125)
- As soon as firms repay their debt to the banks,
the money initially created is destroyed
(Graziani 1989 5) - Result from
- Forgetting generation of surplus in production
- Not thinking dynamically when fundamentally
The Circuit is dynamic!