EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

Description:

My Pay vs. Other's Pay. My qualifications Other's qualifications. My work done Other's work done ... Assessing similarities and differences among jobs within a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2564
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: mwB4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION


1
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
  • Definition All forms of financial returns and
    tangible services and benefits employees receive
    as part of an employment relationship.
  • Objectives
  • Efficiency
  • Attract and retain qualified employees
  • Control costs
  • Motivate high performance
  • Equity
  • Compliance

2
The Perceived Equity of PayA Comparison of
Ratios
  • My Pay vs. Others Pay
  • My qualifications Others qualifications
  • My work done Others work done
  • My product value Others product value

3
Step 1 Internal Consistency
  • Focus on internal comparisons
  • Assessing similarities and differences among jobs
    within a single organization, and the relative
    contribution of the jobs to organization
    objectives.
  • Establishing equal pay for jobs of equal worth
    and acceptable pay differentials for jobs of
    unequal worth.

4
Internal Consistency (contd)
  • Key considerations
  • Egalitarian v. hierarchical structure
  • Single v. multiple structures
  • Job-based v. person-based structure
  • Key activity Evaluation of worth
  • Ranking (most subjective)
  • Classification
  • Point method (least subjective)

5
Developing the Point Method
  • Select compensable factors
  • Characteristics of jobs that the organization
    values and chooses to pay for
  • Consider the work, the organization, and the Ees
  • Assign relative weights to each factor
  • Reflect relative importance of the factor
  • Weights should total to 100
  • Weights are the same for all jobs
  • Define factor degrees
  • Represent different levels of requirements
    associated with each factor

6
Implementing the Point Method
  • Evaluate the worth of each job
  • Read the job description
  • Select the appropriate degree for each factor
  • Multiply the degree by the factor
  • Total the points for all factors
  • Summarize your results
  • Degrees/points for each factor for each job
  • Summary job structure
  • Total points for each job, in descending order

7
Step 2 External Competitiveness
  • Focus on external comparisons
  • Pay relationships among organizations competing
    in the external labor market
  • Pay comparisons for the same jobs across
    different organizations

8
External Competitiveness Key Activities
  • 1. Setting a pay policy relative to competitors
  • Options
  • Lead
  • Lag
  • Match
  • Variable
  • Constraints/Considerations
  • Organizational conditions
  • Labor market conditions
  • Product market conditions

9
External Competitiveness Key Activities (contd)
  • Measuring the market
  • The myth of the market wage
  • Estimating the market pay line
  • Salary (j.e. points) (x)
  • Regression analysis
  • Pay per point
  • Creating a pay policy line
  • Creating pay grades/bands and ranges

10
COMPARABLE WORTH
  • Definition A doctrine that maintains that women
    performing jobs judged to be equal on some
    measure of inherent worth should be paid the same
    as men.
  • The Problem The earnings gap
  • The Cause
  • Differences in human capital, or
  • Occupational crowding into low-paying jobs
  • Choice or discrimination?

11
Step 3 Recognizing Employee Contributions
  • Focus on comparisons of individual employees
    doing the same job for the same firm.
  • Key Issues
  • Should differences in employee contributions be
    recognized (flat rates v. ranges)?
  • What type(s) of contributions should be rewarded
    (seniority, performance)?
  • At what level of performance (individual v.
    group) should pay increases be determined?
  • Which technique should be used to reward
    differences in contributions?

12
Should Pay Be Tied to Performance?
  • Impact on equity objectives
  • Is it fair to base pay on performance?
  • Is it fair not to base pay on performance?
  • What do employees believe?
  • Impact on efficiency objectives
  • Can pay be used to improve performance?
  • What is the impact of pay-for-performance on
    turnover?

13
To What Level of Performance Should Pay Increases
be Tied?
  • Individual-level performance
  • Theoretically establishes a close link between
    individual performance and pay
  • Encourages competition
  • Discourages focus on team work

14
  • Group-level performance
  • Aligns the interests of employees with those of
    the group
  • Encourages team work and flexibility
  • Weakens the link between individual performance
    and pay
  • Free rider problem
  • Ties pay to outcomes over which employees have
    limited control

15
Choosing a Technique for Rewarding Performance
An Expectancy Theory Framework
  • Effort Task/Goal Reward
  • Accomplishment
  • Expectancy Instrumentality Valence

16
Assessing the Likely Impact of a
Pay-for-Performance Plan on Motivation
  • The Analysis
  • To what outcome is the pay increase tied?
  • Are employees likely to believe they can do it?
  • How much control do employees have over the
    outcome?
  • Do employees have the needed skills, knowledge,
    and abilities?
  • If not, expectancy perceptions are low.

17
The Analysis (contd)
  • Do employees believe that, if they reach the
    goal, a reward will follow?
  • Consider employee relations
  • Consider the firms ability to pay
  • If not, then instrumentality perceptions are low
  • Is the reward valued by employees?
  • Just noticeable difference (JND)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com